TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

uçuyorum

Contributor
Messages
978
Reactions
13 1,598
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,314
Reactions
152 16,717
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
A nice and very important detail has been overlooked.
During this firing test, 2 MAM-T bombs were sent to the target. Incidentally, both bombs hit the target at the same spot. Second one going through the hole of the first one. Good targeting!
 
Last edited:

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,949
Reactions
38 20,312
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
A nice and very important detail has been overlooked.
During this firing test, 2 MAM-T bombs were sent to the target. Incidentally, both bombs hit the target at the same spot. Second one going through the hole of the first one. Good targeting!
if that targetting could be done automatically then that would indeed be extremely impressive. And could turn even small size UCAV into dangerous platforms for naval vessels.
 

IC3M@N FX

Committed member
Messages
292
Reactions
13 604
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Is there actually a better engine than TEI PD170 for higher payloads for MALE drones like TB2/3 and Anka S?
 

IC3M@N FX

Committed member
Messages
292
Reactions
13 604
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Yes...is not really better Engine then PD170

PD222
Screenshot_2025-01-20-10-08-01-648_com.sec.android.app.sbrowser-edit.jpg


PD170
Screenshot_2025-01-20-10-12-27-979_com.sec.android.app.sbrowser-edit.jpg


PD270?
20000ft 250hp
30000ft 170hp

Would not be bad then you could carry 450-500kg payload, the TB3 would benefit immensely. It could carry 2-4 MAM-T and 1x air-to-air missile against enemy drones with dual/quad pneumatic racks + 1-2 Tolun SDB or 2 UAV 122 missiles and the ASELSAN Antidot 2 pod.

It could thus become a small workhorse for the armed forces.
 
Last edited:

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,314
Reactions
152 16,717
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
They are both 2.1 litre diesel engines. If memory serves they are built on the same old Mercedes engine block. (I may be wrong there)
PD222, has a single turbo charger, where as PD170 has a two stage turbo charger and uses less fuel and has better high altitude performance.
PD222 was specifically developed with high power at low altitude to give better take off performance as it was really meant for being used on drones taking off from TCG Anadolu.
If you enlarge the engine, then you are adding more weight and size to the drone. The only engine type that will give better performance is a turboprop.
P&W PT6A-110 with around 354HP weighs about 150kg dry. But they will cost more to buy, run and maintain. They are thirstier engines too.
Mercedes manages to develop 265HP from a 2.1litre twin turbo OM654 engine. So there may be room for more power to be squeezed from our PD170. But one is a road going engine and ours is an aviation engine. So not the same parameters to compare.
 
Top Bottom