Ahh now from Zelensky is not a dictator at all to slowly recognizing him as trying to act as one. Nice progression there.I am not blind on Zelensky, I never liked him and my presumption is that he is a wannabe dictator. But it is just a presumption, nothing has been proven yet. What his political rivals say about him is irrelevant, because in politics people will always say bad things about you if there is disagreement.
As for Zelensky being a dictator, for this to happen you need two things:
1) For him to want to be a dictator (let’s presume he wants to)
2) For him to be able to use the system in a way that keeps him in power forever (this remains to be seen in the following years)
Many politicians in democratic countries are wannabe dictators, but because the system is stronger then them, they fail. This is why you have the separation of powers in a democracy.
What makes Russia a dictatorship is the fact that Putin was able to retain power despite the fact that initially the constitution banned him from seving a third term, just like in the case of Hugo Chavez and Xi Jinping. When leaders are able to change the constitution in order to remain in power, because the constitution prohibited them from keeping the power, that’s when a democracy is turned into a dictatorship.
Look man, just because the actors in the system are YET to breach the system, doesn't mean they're in any way accurate measurements, sometimes all it takes is one hint.
The U.S. for example acted like they needed Congress permission to export weapons abroad, which is why Ukraine doesn't get the aid they wanted (because the Republicans torpedoed it every time). But you could see that the system doesn't prevent the Americans from sending aid to Israel by circumventing the congress.
https://edition.cnn.com/2023/12/08/politics/state-department-congress-tank-munitions-sale/index.html
The US State Department transmitted an emergency declaration to lawmakers late Friday night for the sale of thousands of munitions to Israel, the agency announced, bypassing the standard 20-day period that congressional committees are typically afforded to review such a sale.
That's double standard and a breach of standard at the same time, that's all we need to know that the systems you're so proud of exist as a mere facade, readily thrown into the bin whenever the politicians deemed necessary. Of course they will try to make it legitimate by pointing some state dept power as loopholes to send aid to israel bypassing congress, but you get the idea.
So again this democracy of the West is just mere facade, there's no difference than the one we saw in China and Russia.
Rashida Tlaib was not jailed and tortured, like it would have happened to her if she was in Russia and have spoken against the war. In the US, the reaction to her was a resolution that was voted with a small margin of only 234-188 after being debated and her being allowed to support her point of view. There was also a failed resolutiom before that, so the attempt didn’t even pass the first time.
I mean, could you kill a fly with a grenade? Sure you can, but why would you?
Rashida Tlaib is not yet powerful enough to make the difference in foreign policy act of the United States w.r.t israel, if she does, there's every reason to believe that the U.S and it's jewish lobby will use all kinds of methods including violence and torture to get rid of her, the same way Russia is "reportedly" doing with its own dissidents.
Right now when just merely silencing her is deemed enough why would you escalate?
You are really dishonest if you are trying to make an equivalent between the political freedom in the US and the one in Russia. The US system is far from being perfect, and it has its problems, but it is a lot better and allows far more freedom than the political system in Russia. Yes, they have some things in common, but all the differences are in the favor of the US.
The one that keeps finding excuses is you pal LOL. If the U.S is good at something, it's making a facade and turning illegal act looks acting legit. This is my acknowledgement that they are way ahead of anyone in town.
The big difference is that whenever a country in the so called “West” does the same things as Russia, there is popular blowback, protests and a very solid pushback from the population and part of the media. This is because the population is more educated and less brainwashed, and it doesn’t support genocide (There are some people who do, but not the majority).
You won’t see mass protests in support of Ukraine happening in Russia, like you’ve seen protests in support of the Palestinians in the West.
Oh really? France has banned pro-Palestinian protests, the UK banned the waving of Palestinian flags and Germany introduced law where they force people (mainly from Muslim countries) to basically recognize Israel under threat of the evocation of their citizenship.
In Russia they jail you, in the West they make life so difficult for you, until you basically have to submit to pressure. It's practically the same goal different method.
What bothered people in the West about the Russian behavior is the fact that it had total popular support. The average Russian was ok with the indiscriminate killing of civilians, and you saw on Russian TV people speaking freely about nuking countries and committing genocide.
And you guys are any different ? HAHA. I've watched people who used to be so critical of Russia's conduct both in Syria and Ukraine like Julian Roepcke suddenly turns into the most vile genocide supporters of Israel, people that used to think be very good at fact checking Russian disinfo suddenly throwing away their masks and rallied behind Israel without questioning the validity of the reports coming from politicians like Netanyahu.