Live Conflict Ukraine-Russia War

Anastasius

Contributor
Moderator
Azerbaijan Moderator
Messages
1,335
Reactions
3 2,941
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
That has to be bs.

You dont destroy morale like that!!
Most people thought the Ghost of Kyiv was a made-up morale booster for Ukrainians anyway. I'm still not sure that he isn't and this isn't just another attempt to boost credibility by slapping the moniker on some random Ukrainian pilot but whatever.
 

McCool

Contributor
Messages
685
Reactions
1,907
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
I say wait for 2-3 weeks of combat and Russia will be weakened enough to allow swift Ukrainian blow all across the eastern front.

For Ukraine now it's imperative to kill and destroy as many Russian unit as possible while keeping their forces intact. Trading space for time, until all the promised weaponry are delivered.

We might not even see any advance towards Kherson for a while, Ukraine might opt to wait in ambush of any Russian advance towards Mykolaiv or limited raid into Russian controlled territories.

My best guess is mid May to mid June. That's the timeframe where Ukraine will be strong enough to punch back against a severely depleted Russian army.

Ukraine has by the time of this writing had achieve tank parity with Russia due to Russia extreme losses and Ukraine kept capturing their tanks. The inflow of more than 250 MBT's from Poland and Czechia as well as artillery and other equipment will allow Ukraine to outmatch Russian early numerical superiority.

NATO might also (if not already) plays a helping hand with intelligence and planning in the upcoming Ukraine's offensive, as @tracer had previously note with Sigint and battlefield surveillance cooperation.

The Russian invasion give the West, a once in a time opportunity to de-militarize Russia without having to sweat and spill their own blood. For the US this means neutralizing Russia as a long term high end near peer threat for a very long time on the cheap so that they could use their resources for the China fight in the Pacific. And for Europe this means return to a rational defense policy , after this debacle Europe economic policy will no longer trump military spending. The peace dividend of the end of Cold war is officially over.

Putin after all is not the master strategist that we all used to assume.
 

B.t.N

Committed member
Messages
280
Reactions
299
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
I say wait for 2-3 weeks of combat and Russia will be weakened enough to allow swift Ukrainian blow all across the eastern front.

For Ukraine now it's imperative to kill and destroy as many Russian unit as possible while keeping their forces intact. Trading space for time, until all the promised weaponry are delivered.

We might not even see any advance towards Kherson for a while, Ukraine might opt to wait in ambush of any Russian advance towards Mykolaiv or limited raid into Russian controlled territories.

My best guess is mid May to mid June. That's the timeframe where Ukraine will be strong enough to punch back against a severely depleted Russian army.

Ukraine has by the time of this writing had achieve tank parity with Russia due to Russia extreme losses and Ukraine kept capturing their tanks. The inflow of more than 250 MBT's from Poland and Czechia as well as artillery and other equipment will allow Ukraine to outmatch Russian early numerical superiority.

NATO might also (if not already) plays a helping hand with intelligence and planning in the upcoming Ukraine's offensive, as @tracer had previously note with Sigint and battlefield surveillance cooperation.

The Russian invasion give the West, a once in a time opportunity to de-militarize Russia without having to sweat and spill their own blood. For the US this means neutralizing Russia as a long term high end near peer threat for a very long time on the cheap so that they could use their resources for the China fight in the Pacific. And for Europe this means return to a rational defense policy , after this debacle Europe economic policy will no longer trump military spending. The peace dividend of the end of Cold war is officially over.

Putin after all is not the master strategist that we all used to assume.
No offense bro, you sound a bit too optimistic, based on a hunch! Russians are a different beast at defence. A Ukranian victory is a far cry for now, with or without all the heavy metal poured in by the West.

But when Uncle Sam’s (aging or soon-to-be- retired) F16s start patrolling Ukrainian airspace, now that is a whole different story…
 
Last edited:

Soldier30

Contributor
Messages
1,143
Reactions
8 686
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
Hollywood actress Angelina Jolie arrived in Ukraine. She was noticed in one of the local cafes in the city of Lviv. Apparently, the actress visited Ukraine as part of a program to help the people of Ukraine together with the UN Ambassador for Refugees.

 

Kathirz

Contributor
Moderator
Spain Moderator
Messages
476
Reactions
2 1,135
Nation of residence
Spain
Nation of origin
Spain
I agree, the west's goal now is the utter defeat of russia and preferably the dissolution of russia as a state through internal collapse. That would allow for some of the eastern and southern parts of russia to declare independence. Considering that they have been using conscripts and personell from those regions i can't imagine that they are particularly happy with the central government right now, but they are of course kept in line out of fear.

Even if putin declares war and general mobilisation in may, it will take months and months before anything would change on the battlefield in Ukraine. First they would have to actually get people to show up at the drafting centers, then they would have to be trained, and then finally sent on to the border. At the same time they would have to pull tanks and IFV's from storage, find out which ones actually work and then send them over huge distances to where they need to be.

Once the troops and materiell arrives, they would have to be kitted out for combat, fed, and organised into a fighting unit. This will also take quite a bit of time since the Russian army lack competent NCOs even in their elite units. Russian logistics have been on the point of breaking down completely since the operation began. Adding another 100k troops arriving at the border wouldn't help at all.

To sum up: A general mobilisation in russia would take lots and lots of time and resources, and would probably break the logistics they have in ukraine right now.

Now, there is still a ticking clock, supplying and training the ukrainian army and air force on modern equipment while at the same time, supplying them with replacements to their existing stuff. I bet they are being pre-emptively trained on patriot systems and (hopefully) leo-2's and m1's as well, even though it wouldn't be public information until they are ready for the first shipments. During the summer the ukrainians would then shift from old russian equipment to newer western stuff to be ready to go on the offensive during late summer with fancy new weapons in the east. Before they are ready and fully equipped, they will counterattack in places where their light infantry can make a difference, while slowly trading land for time in the east, making the russians bleed for every village. I think they still really want to take Kherson, then the river would be a great defensive line to hold until they are ready to cross and heavy armor, even modern armor, wouldn't be particularly useful in city fighting anyways.

I'm sure the posturing in Transnistria is just a way for the Russians to try to prevent Ukraine from redeploying all their units from Odessa to the eastern fronts. Transnistria is completely isolated, the only way to resupply them would be to fly transports over southern and western ukraine, which would be hilarious if they tried and whatever soviet memorabilia they still have running would be prime targets of the 1st Ukraininan Farmers brigade.
I completely agree with your post and I would like to add something to expand this argument. After Boris Yeltsin handover country duties to Putin, whitin "United Russia" party, he transitioned from a brand new democracy towards an old dictatorship, this will be easy understandable considering the great difficulties of keeping people together in a very heterogeneous federation after a political loss, in which Putin found fear and threat as the only ally to face the world that had remained.

After one of the most prosperous moments in the western world, where microelectronics, chips, laser and computing have ended in peoples lives, Putin is today sending young boys to a war the world doesn't fully understand. It seems to be the reflection of what western region of Russia thought was the rest of it's vast and inherited territory. In which we can find some of the mayor economical differences in the world, as some lucky rich regions have the highest salaries in the federeation but their way of living is much worse than other parts of the country.
This helps to realize the low steem central goverment has had with them, and the lack of capacity to understand and give voice to their own realities. In fact a it's a "country" in which some privileged ones got main power from the rest but needs to enforce unity with weapons, propaganda and fear. You could just open google maps and watch were most of asphalted roads are built in the country.

Those regions would have to understand why to pay such, non asked, high price and having to face the reality of war story against them, which has a great psychological power, and probably they will want to be independent regions in future with west support.

They are alone after attacking an inocent country with which they had strong treaties and responsabilities. So they are not attacking a fascist country, they are the fascists, and Putin seems to have commited that big mistake or success against their own policital reality and the rest of the world who is watching for a long time.

I will want to add, fascist powers will find their reality again in Crimea, but this time they will watch it on TV. Sorry for the protagonists but in most cases, we have not been able to choose any better ones.


yalta1.png
 
Last edited:

Madokafc

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
5,903
Reactions
4 10,020
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Russian losses about 2000 of Armored vehicles in any Type if we are looking from Oryx data, that's amount is sufficient to form around 40-50 Mechanized battalion or armored ones. US observed Russian losses around 16,000-20,000 personnel dead and Twice that number is being crippled. That's happened in span of two month conflict.

Russian Empire, during Tsar Nicholas rules being beaten by Imperial Japan Forces and losses between 35,000 to 55,000 during one and half year of conflict, not to mention about Twice of the number is crippled by injury. That's alone sufficient to forced Tsar to embroiled in political crisis and revolution. In which Russian Empire at the time is much more powerful and had more population base compared to today Russia. People tend to forget about the fact if Russian is not imune of revolution prospect and their people is too longing for better condition
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom