It's not a secret that every US adversary from China to Russia wants to immitate what the US did in Desert Storm. Russia fails in Ukraine trying to do such repeat. It remains to be seen how China will fare in Taiwan.
Just saying but Taiwan and Ukraine are completely different
holy cope talk about trying to backtrack so hard that you have to go post a video that does not talk about the radar's range other than my source coming from a pilot lol. I said only the infrared side can go 1,300 or 1,200kms but that is for rockets and not aircrafts. Your right i dont know the ap-81s capabilities but I do know what information was posted.clearly not, because I point out the ability for the APG-81 to track objects while you dismissed the whole thing as DAS (only) tracking. You could see the whole tracking in this video
and on 1:53 you could see a consistent APG-81 track while DAS momentarily tracked the debris.
The thing with Billie Flynn interview is that we don't know the rules of engagement (RoE) of said exercise, he said that he detected the enemy at 200 miles= 321km away, but we don't and prolly wont know if that's the max detection range because ALL exercise are all rigged. This is like saying the Indian air force >>>> USAF because the Indian air force reportedly knocked the USAF in 2004.
But we don't know what kind of limitations imposed on the US pilots in those exercise, we don't know when they could turn on their radar , the scenario in which they operate or even the size of the airspace used in the exercise.
Lexington Institute
In February, U.S. fighter pilots participated in their first air-combat exercise with the air force of India. The results were shocking. According to comments made the same month by Representative Randy . . .www.lexingtoninstitute.org
Billie Flynn said he detect object at 200 miles, but he didn't say what object he detects or if its the maximum possible track an APG-81 could do.
Radars spec especially sophisticated ones like the APG-81 are closely guarded secret, the military won't tell its true performance, manufacturers only gives you general idea of the performance and professional aviator like Billie Flynn CERTAINLY won't blow the entire thing by mentioning the real radar capability in a YouTube interview.
www.sydney.edu.au
not even CNN propaganda matches those numbers ghost of kyiv is really real I guess https://edition.cnn.com/europe/live...s-05-01-22/h_9c8808827bce42c5e27deca12af8f1ef even oryx is pulling 401 T-72s and 127 T-80s https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/T-80 so either him or ukraine is bullshitting which is no surprise you have not answered if the ghost of kyiv was real.
tass.com
Bro you can buy that buckle on the Amazon. Another bs by OSINT.
Bro you can buy that buckle on the Amazon. Another bs by OSINT.
Something like this:
View attachment 43983
Looks like this. "1957 officers belt"
https://www.antiqueshop.ru/catalogue/morskie_priboru/comments_item_74232.html
Correct, the only information we've got is he tracked an object at ~200 miles. Does he meant that is the maximum track range of the APG-81 ? No way to tell.....
hehe, first of all we're talking about SAR capabilities, not air-air tracking capabilities LOL. in which the IRBIS reportedly able to give a resolution of around 3m at a range we don't know and the APG-70 also with a resolution of around 2.6m also at a range we don't know.
Serious breakthrough in VKS, now it's definitely ahead of West. Where're you local?
Serious breakthrough in VKS, now it's definitely ahead of West. Where're you local
Funny how he is using ghost of kyiv argument while @Oryx has given pictures and confirmation about every MBT or IFV got destroyed Russians are so pathetic they can't just accept they are losing stuff and desperate enough to COPE here.Correct, the only information we've got is he tracked an object at ~200 miles. Does he meant that is the maximum track range of the APG-81 ? No way to tell.....
otoh... This shows APG-81 and DAS tracking at almost the same time. Reportedly at the time of testing, the range is around 1300km.
Is Northrop bullshitting here ??
hehe, first of all we're talking about SAR capabilities, not air-air tracking capabilities LOL. in which the IRBIS reportedly able to give a resolution of around 3m^2 at a range we don't know and the APG-70 also with a resolution of around 2.6m^2 also at a range we don't know.
So until we know the specific spec on both, there's no way we could say which one is the better one.
in post #12,748 yo mention this:
safe to say you're mixing the air-air detection data with the SAR resolution....lol
and how do you come to this conclusion ? For China to succeed they MUST occupy Taiwan, something they would have to do in the space of only 2 months every year. For an amphib assault to succeed the Chinese must land during high tide and Taiwan KNOWS what time is that exactly to the weeks. There would be no surprise attack here.
China could theoratically bomb Taiwan to dust, but if they can't occupy Taiwan, Taiwan wins
youtube.com
youtube.com
