Live Conflict Ukraine-Russia War

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,685
Reactions
55 4,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey


What would be announced ? I've seen reports about Germany to send more pzh2000 and HIMARS.
US? maybe Reapers? I think it would be a good answer to iranian drones.
 

MaciekRS

Contributor
Moderator
Poland Moderator
Messages
450
Reactions
6 1,230
Nation of residence
Poland
Nation of origin
Poland
Not only that
But using nuclear bomb in Ukraine means the creation of nuclear winter for at least 6 months and this will 100% spread to Russia.
WOW, just WOW :)
WHERE did you hear that story :)
There is ZERO chance for any "nuclear winter" by using tactical nukes. Tactical nukes are not that special and powerfull.
And he cant use strategic nukes without global war and total anihilation of Russia (and many cities in the west).
 

Ecderha

Experienced member
Messages
4,552
Reactions
4 7,822
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
In short: the CEO of Tesla and SpaceX is doing SECRET DEALS with war criminals that sabotage the safety of the United States and lies about it when exposed. And that is JUST WHAT WE FOUND OUT TODAY about Elon Musk.

Elon Musk took wrong path. All talented people soon or later make Epic Fail move and when other people find about that Talented person start to LIE and LIE :rolleyes: . Elon Musk made Greedy move which world will not Forgive

 

Ecderha

Experienced member
Messages
4,552
Reactions
4 7,822
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey

As I said and I will keep saying this -> Just take you time and Think what you seeing (Theory of guy drawing picture) and compare with (already tactic which Ukraine army did ).

So Lets Accept offense happening ( i can not say is it True or False from reddit)

Drawing on reddit is a Lie. Why?

I keep watching and Think How Ukraine army Made and Keep doing the Same Tactic because russian generals do NOT adapt.
So what Ukraine army does.

1. They get info about where is less defended or Weak spot of Front line. When they find it they prepare to go Step 2
2. Group of Already best professional soldiers push through this Weak front line -> Break through and then they go AS FAST AS POSSIBLE to DEEP -> then setup Ambushes and KEEP killing russian backups which keep coming on already Broken Front line spot on emergency
3. Next russians on that front get order to retreat
4. Then Ukraine army groups which Always attack on Flanks start to make encirclement to cut russians. This always happened to work




So when I see some drawings of frontal attacks by Ukraine army I just do NOT believe it is true. Only russians do this -> many russians dumb soldiers are send frontal they die and more wave are coming and they die too. At same time russian artillery is massively shooting many many shells....etc. Then russians can break through front line or they just retreat because there are no cannon fodders left
 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
3,490
Reactions
16 9,331
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
As I said and I will keep saying this -> Just take you time and Think what you seeing (Theory of guy drawing picture) and compare with (already tactic which Ukraine army did ).

So Lets Accept offense happening ( i can not say is it True or False from reddit)

Drawing on reddit is a Lie. Why?

I keep watching and Think How Ukraine army Made and Keep doing the Same Tactic because russian generals do NOT adapt.
So what Ukraine army does.

1. They get info about where is less defended or Weak spot of Front line. When they find it they prepare to go Step 2
2. Group of Already best professional soldiers push through this Weak front line -> Break through and then they go AS FAST AS POSSIBLE to DEEP -> then setup Ambushes and KEEP killing russian backups which keep coming on already Broken Front line spot on emergency
3. Next russians on that front get order to retreat
4. Then Ukraine army groups which Always attack on Flanks start to make encirclement to cut russians. This always happened to work




So when I see some drawings of frontal attacks by Ukraine army I just do NOT believe it is true. Only russians do this -> many russians dumb soldiers are send frontal they die and more wave are coming and they die too. At same time russian artillery is massively shooting many many shells....etc. Then russians can break through front line or they just retreat because there are no cannon fodders left

Yes, maybe the most telling thing of this entire war is how Russia has shown no ability whatsoever to adapt, meanwhile the Ukrainians keep finding ways to outsmart their enemy.

It reminds me of that video clip towards the start of the war where a Ukrainian solder in a trench is being asked about how they plan to win against Russia and he says something along the lines, "lucky for us are enemy is exceptionally stupid". I think most people would agree that what we've seen from the Russian military time and time again has been absolute stupidity.

In nearly every conceivable way the Russians had the advantage over Ukraine, yet here we are however many months into Putin's 3 day war with all signs pointing towards an eventual Ukrainian victory.
 
Last edited:

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,817
Reactions
120 19,931
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
In nearly every conceivable way the Russians had the advantage over Ukraine

No plan (or perceived/asserted advantage) survives first contact with the enemy.

Russia simply did not actually reform anything regarding its military since the USSR collapse.

You don't throw (already strained) money at a (non-money based) problem to fix it, that just creates inflation (exact same thing as hype and delusion).

So from onset I saw no real advantage Russia had over Ukraine (if Ukraine buckled up and decided to fight, which it did).

Strategically, the population ratio is just 3:1 as well. Essentially in many ways Russia has overall picked a fight with a peer (that too one that knows you deep down psychologically too)....which is just a dumb idea.

Vauban proved long time ago that with proper defence, organisation and resistance in large enough landmass (tempered already from earlier wars) you need something like 10:1 for any chance of breakthrough given defenders advantage...w.r.t conventional warfare for any age going forward (assuming no big tech level disparity).

Or as invader (to surmount this matter) you need a massive tactical (and risky) innovation commensurate to the land, strategic depth and opponents positioning.... but again that's something Russia simply paid no attention to from its inherited soviet psyche and approach which are just not relevant at all to this scope of 21st century. Russia deeply misunderstood that it cannot cookie cutter, copy paste its approach to conflict....Ukraine is whole different level of opponent and it didnt recognise that.
 

GoatsMilk

Experienced member
Messages
3,490
Reactions
16 9,331
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
No plan (or perceived/asserted advantage) survives first contact with the enemy.

Russia simply did not actually reform anything regarding its military since the USSR collapse.

You don't throw (already strained) money at a (non-money based) problem to fix it, that just creates inflation (exact same thing as hype and delusion).

So from onset I saw no real advantage Russia had over Ukraine (if Ukraine buckled up and decided to fight, which it did).

Strategically, the population ratio is just 3:1 as well. Essentially in many ways Russia has overall picked a fight with a peer (that too one that knows you deep down psychologically too)....which is just a dumb idea.

Vauban proved long time ago that with proper defence, organisation and resistance in large enough landmass (tempered already from earlier wars) you need something like 10:1 for any chance of breakthrough given defenders advantage...w.r.t conventional warfare for any age going forward (assuming no big tech level disparity).

Or as invader (to surmount this matter) you need a massive tactical (and risky) innovation commensurate to the land, strategic depth and opponents positioning.... but again that's something Russia simply paid no attention to from its inherited soviet psyche and approach which are just not relevant at all to this scope of 21st century. Russia deeply misunderstood that it cannot cookie cutter, copy paste its approach to conflict....Ukraine is whole different level of opponent and it didnt recognise that.

I can't really disagree with this now especially after everything thats transpired. But before the war I looked at it as if looking at details on a spreadsheet. Russia in my mind had too much of everything comparatively speaking. Then I factored in the flat terrain, Russia's ability to open multiple fronts at the same time and the biggest issue of all how much of the political spectrum in Ukraine could potentially be comprised. Especially considering how they were able to take Crimea.

Of all the material advantages it was really the airpower gap that had me most concerned.

But as with everything concerning Russia, what they say and what the reality is are always two completely different things.
 

Soldier30

Experienced member
Russian Armed Forces News Editor
Messages
1,566
Reactions
9 853
Nation of residence
Russia
Nation of origin
Russia
A serviceman of the Russian Airborne Forces spoke about the episode of the battle with the liquidation of the tank breakthrough of the Ukrainian army. As reported, 6 tanks and more than 10 units of other armored and automotive vehicles were destroyed.


The Russian crew of the T-72B3 tank of the 2016 model, inspected the wrecked foreign-made T-72 tank of Ukraine.


The newest Russian battle tank T-14 "Armata" was noticed at the training ground of the Kazan Tank Command School. There has been unconfirmed information that the Russian army may use about nine T-14 Armata tanks in Ukraine to test their combat systems in real combat. To date, it is not known exactly how many T-14 Armata tanks the Russian army has, according to some sources, from 21 to 132, judging by the contracts and agreements that were reported in the media.


The FV104 Samaritan armored personnel carrier appeared in the Ukrainian army, this is an armored ambulance. The armored car was developed 46 years ago in England and is considered rare, only 100 pieces were produced. The transporter was developed on the basis of the British FV101 Scorpion tank and has a crew of 2 people. The vehicle can transport 4 wounded on stretchers and 2 medics. The vehicle has no weapons. The 190 horsepower engine is installed in the front right side of the hull. The maximum speed on the highway is 72 km / h, the cruising range is 480 km.

 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,685
Reactions
55 4,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
The first drone battles.
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,101
Reactions
27 8,791
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Fe8bfWMXoAEC1Zm


Sadly, all Turkic states except Türkiye were either absent or chose abstention regarding the condemnation of annexed areas by Russia.
 

Dmitry

Committed member
Ukraine Correspondent
Messages
239
Reactions
4 841
Nation of residence
Ukraine
Nation of origin
Ukraine
The first recorded air "battle" of Russian and Ukrainian quadrocopters in the sky of Ukraine


 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,685
Reactions
55 4,804
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
We only have 10% of what we need: Zelensky on air defense systems
1665661939022.png


The President is confident that securing the sky from Russian terror will be a fundamental step towards ending the war.


"I ask you at all levels - in politics, in the media, in communication with voters to protect the provision of Ukraine with a sufficient number of modern air and missile defense systems. Already this year we must protect our skies from Russian terror. And if this is done, it will will be a fundamental step to end the entire war in the near future," the head of state said.


"We have our own air defense which is not enough. We are fighting a territorially large state, with a large amount of equipment and missiles. We really want this support to be many times greater. We also expect powerful steps from France and Italy ... And there is nothing to add here. We have 10% of what we need, to be honest," the president said.

He recalled that Russia delivered 130 cruise missile strikes over the two days, and also used dozens of kamikaze drones.

"We want to be able to close the sky," he stressed.
 
Top Bottom