Do you actually have a source for those comments being Ukrainians, it could just as well be some edgy dipshits from 4chan.
I'm saying it again. Especially Turks and Muslims, be careful who you support.
Please remember, Russian Air force or Ukrainian Air Force bombed and killed 35 Turkish soldiers?
There is a significant difference between two countries towards Türkiye.
At the moment, the goals of Israel, Azerbaijan and Turkey coincide. The Israelis recently attacked Iran with drones.
Russian fascists have always opposed the Jews, even before the creation of the State of Israel. They staged pogroms in Tsarist Russia from the end of the XIX century, that is, they killed all Jews, including babies. The Russian fascists accused the Jews of the fact that the Jewish communists unleashed the Civil War in Russia in 1917-1922 and killed many Russians, that the Jewish communists created many autonomous and union republics on the site of the Russian Empire, which led to the collapse of Russia.
As for the religious solidarity of the Arabs with the Turks. Were there many Arab protests against China in support of the Uyghurs? Zero in my opinion.
Ha, we are getting on the bottom of things. Sort of, within the limits of opponents, of course. I appreciate this and would love others to join. Ru- Uk war is dictationg the dilemma, but lets not be limited with that and Türkiye is offering interesting alternative indeed.dont forget this.
NATO claims to be the Yosemite Sam of alliances but the war in Ukraine is showing what it really is.
1. A bunch of small countries. Their armies number 2,000 but, taking wokeness, diversity, recruiting shortfalls, pregnancy leave and physical fitness into account, they can field 600. They possess 100 major weapons but, taking incompetent storage, broken parts and maintenance problems into account, they can field 40 of them
2. A bunch of medium-size countries. Their armies number 20,000 but, taking wokeness, diversity, recruiting shortfalls, pregnancy leave and physical fitness into account, they can field 6,000. They possess 500 major weapons but, taking incompetent storage, broken parts and maintenance problems into account, they can field 200 of them.
3. One big country. Its army numbers 200,000 but, taking wokeness, diversity, recruiting shortfalls, pregnancy leave and physical fitness into account, it can field 60,000. (Given the enormous number of bases that have to be manned, probably not). It possesses 5,000 major weapons but, taking incompetent storage, broken parts and maintenance problems into account, it can field 2,000 of them. (And this stuff is scattered all over the place). Some of its rulers want to fight Russia, some want to fight Germany and some want to fight China – but they’re sure they can do all three at once.
4. Nobody has more than a month or two of ammunition and, actually, a lot less than that because they’ve give so much to Ukraine and it’s all gone. Somewhere.
5. All this costs more than you can imagine.
6. These countries’ GDPs are the sum of lawyers’ fees, financial flim-flam, fake numbers, real estate commissions, payoffs to politicians and non-stop printing presses. The only one of them that actually makes anything is going bust.
7. “Look on my works, ye Mighty, and despair!”
By Helmholtz Smith
This is why Turkey is distancing itself from the west.
Here is the work of modern Russian fascists. They changed the propaganda poster of the Reds during the Civil War.You know there was a time when i looked into the claim that the bolsheviks/communists were predominately jews. I remember discovering something along the lines that the top 100 involved in the revolution only about 13 were jews.
Remember that there were actually two distinct explosions – the first one to the south, on Pipe A of Nord Stream 2 alone, at 2:03 in the morning; and the second on both Nord Stream 1 pipes and again on Pipe A of Nord Stream 2, at a separate location miles to the north and exactly seventeen hours later, at 19:03:The Norwegian navy was quick to find the right spot, in the shallow waters of the Baltic sea a few miles off Denmark’s Bornholm Island. The pipelines ran more than a mile apart along a seafloor that was only 260 feet deep. That would be well within the range of the divers …
The C4 attached to the pipelines would be triggered by a sonar buoy dropped by a plane on short notice, but the procedure involved the most advanced signal processing technology. …
On September 26, 2022, a Norwegian Navy P8 surveillance plane made a seemingly routine flight and dropped a sonar buoy. The signal spread underwater, initially to Nord Stream 2 and then on to Nord Stream 1. A few hours later, the high-powered C4 explosives were triggered and three of the four pipelines were put out of commission. …
The ex-DDR tabloid Berliner Kurier meanwhile leads with Seymour Hersh’s investigative reporting credentials, and Sahra Wagenknecht’s essential endorsement of his reporting.The Russian propaganda outlet Russia Today was one of the first to pick up the literally and politically explosive story. On Twitter, the Kremlin loyalists claimed: “American investigative journalist and former NYT writer Seymour Hersh has published an explosive article on who is behind the mysterious explosion that destroyed the Russian Nord Stream gas pipeline.”
It's possible that it was the US. However, I do have some issues with the article:Seymour Hersh claims the US Navy blew up the Nord Stream pipelines. Not too surprisingly but there are some interesting details. The NYT and others have articles on it but the best one IMO is by Eugyppius:
The Pulitzer Prize-winning investigative journalist has the story from a single high-level anonymous source, and it's not without problems.
For months, the Nord Stream story has lain dormant; investigations have yielded no news, except to confirm the obvious sabotage. Only the occasional delighted remarks by American officials have made headlines in the meantime. All of that changed seven hours ago, when Seymour Hersh posted a lengthy Substack article on How America Took Out The Nord Stream Pipeline.
Hersh has a high-level anonymous source, who alleges that the attack was conceived by the Biden administration in late 2021, and carried out by U.S. Navy divers from their Diving and Salvage Center in Panama City in collaboration with Norway. Explosive charges were allegedly attached to the pipelines during the June BALTOPS 22 naval exercises in the region. The plan was originally to use timed explosives, but the administration opted at the last minute instead for a trigger mechanism that could be set off with a sonar buoy. This buoy, according to Hersh, was dropped by a Norwegian navy plane on 26 September 2022, triggering the explosions.
The story appears poised to make it into major media; as I type this, it’s already been picked up by the Times and Reuters.
As always, you should read Hersh’s piece and make up your own mind. I confess to some substantial reservations. As written, the account is broadly plausible, particularly in light of the open and blunt statements of American officials, but it also seems, at the very least, incomplete.
I’m having particular problems with this part of Hersh’s reporting:
Remember that there were actually two distinct explosions – the first one to the south, on Pipe A of Nord Stream 2 alone, at 2:03 in the morning; and the second on both Nord Stream 1 pipes and again on Pipe A of Nord Stream 2, at a separate location miles to the north and exactly seventeen hours later, at 19:03:
Hersh’s article, describing explosives laid at a location where both Nord Stream pipes ran parallel, seems to be only about the second, more northerly attack. This is a fairly glaring omission in a piece full of very precise details on other matters, including other operational specifics.
I also wonder about the source’s claim that Biden and Nuland, via early statements that the US would block Nord Stream 2 in the event of a Russian invasion, effectively “downgraded” the action from a covert operation requiring Congressional oversight to a lower-level merely classified action that dispensed planners of having to seek such approval. Perhaps that’s totally believable, but I need more persuading here. The avoidance of Congressional oversight is a recurrent theme in the piece; it’s also allegedly why US Navy divers, rather than special forces, were chosen to carry out the operation. One could argue that, with these claims, Hersh’s source is simply trying to make his story robust to falsification by the House and Senate leadership.
UPDATE: The story is now making its way into the German press. This t-online article gives a hint of how they’ll try to downplay it:
The ex-DDR tabloid Berliner Kurier meanwhile leads with Seymour Hersh’s investigative reporting credentials, and Sahra Wagenknecht’s essential endorsement of his reporting.
(Link to article)
russian facists russian facists russian facists, say it 100 more times.Here is the work of modern Russian fascists. They changed the propaganda poster of the Reds during the Civil War.
Russian fascists are abandoning the Soviet legacy. Tsar Nicholas II is considered the true ruler. A conspiracy of Jews is considered the culprit of the defeat in the First World War and the beginning of the Civil War. That is, internationalism, the struggle against the colonialists, waged by the Soviet Union, is considered wrong wars. The last time the USSR waged such a war was in 1989 in Angola against South Africa, as well as the invasion of Afghanistan.
Therefore, some countries that are grateful to the Soviet Union for help from liberation from European colonialists may have warm feelings for Russia. These are India, China, Cuba. They should thank the Jews, not the Russians, who have always been and remain xenophobes.
"Have you signed up to volunteer?"
View attachment 53846
The text was altered by Russian fascists. The figure shows a distinctly Jewish man.
Inferno Imp. Ghoul Jew. "Have you signed up for the oprichnina division of the NKVD?"
NKVD - translated as the People's Commissariat of Internal Affairs, Stalin's elite police and border troops.
View attachment 53845