So why don't you tell us? How many Russians are involved according to your sources?
in the operation zone 80k
https://militaryland.net/maps/deployment-map/
There is a difference between social media lowest category rumors and a site that actually goes through documenting images of lost equipment.
I am assuming you believe they are creating reserve units and all the videos of the AFU forcing civilians at gun point to mobilize constitutes no significant losses on their side. At that point the casualties have to be way bad than what Oryx states. Hell, I just posted a video about 20 minutes ago of actual soldiers telling different things than what Oryx claims I trust them than being hurt later that no fairy tales in real life exist.
I don't believe AFU is being pushed back by a smaller force. What makes you think that is the case? Typically you need a 3:1 advantage to be successful at counter-attacks. If this war has shown anything, it's that the number of soldiers on the ground matters. AFU was having success in late summer when Russia had not mobilized and now after Russia's 300K plus covert mobilization Russia is the one making progress. Guess why? Because they likely have more troops now or at minimum the same numbers as Ukraine.
you dont? lets do some math or math that is better than Ukrainian math lol.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NATO_Joint_Military_Symbology X means 2,000-20,000, 3 lines 500 to 3,000, 2 lines 300 to 1000, one line 60 to 250, At most Russian troops in this area is 7,700 at the lowest, 67,000 at the highest. To be fair the blue boxes closest to pink line at highest counting 14 X lines(yes there is more but behind the other blue boxes), 1 3 bar and 2 2 bars would be at lowest 15,100 at hghest 285,000 but that can be debated as way higher because i did not count the blue boxes with Xs behind them, so pretty much this is one region and the other regions are the same and as you know it the Russians are pushing them back, so explain to me how the fuck do the russians have higher casualties?
in case you did not see my earlier post look at 17:07 and see the response at 17:30, Ukrainian troops being interviewed by western journalists are even bigger doomers.
Some geographical knowledge might help you. Ukraine is a country that had 43 million population. After Russia's 2014 annexations it was more like 37 million and after losing some more territory in 2022 and probably a few million at minimum fleeing, you are looking at maybe slightly over 30 million, which would be the pool to get fighting age men from. What makes it more challenging is that Ukraine has a bad demographic situation with the highest number of men being in their 40's. With this background, how can it be a surprise to you that Ukraine would have to more aggressively mobilize than 140 million Russia?
its a surprise because only 80K russians are in the operation zone and they have done nothing yet with the 300k reserves because I see 4 Xs in 3 different places and excluding NATO stating the 4 X is 100,000 to US it means 80k to 320k. Ukrainian civilians are already being forced at gunpoint to mobilize, while this is still considered a small scale mobilization by Russia which we have not seen the reserves yet take the offensive and that is excluding their huge growing active duty pool, so yes i see this as a big deal.
They are being pushed back locally. Do you know the exact number of troops that are involved in the fights for every village? Wagner may draw more troops than Ukraine locally to certain areas without having more troops globally.
they are geting pushed back to soon reach Seversk, Bakhmut, Ugledar, kharkiv, kherson Soledar is already taken, I already provided an early source how many are involved by looking at unit sites.
Why don't you tell us the numbers then instead of making rhetorical questions.
see 3rd response.