why did my post get deleted addressing Ukroturk that I match my number of posts with Ecderha? Is there a set rule for number of continuous posts here, or no? Screenshot saving this just in case any moderator deletes it for safety measures to address to admins if it will be an issue.
Does the same rules apply to Ecderha or was that ignored? How many continuous posts do you recommend and what timeframes? If uses are sending reports here, I will do the same.Dear @blackjack
Our team is not a specific fan and is equidistant from all sides. Your posts have been deleted because they are intended to mislead and abuse the thread. You can be sure that we 'll publish the point of view of the Russian or Ukrainian side in an impartial manner. Your messages 'll be published unless you send flood posts.
Does the same rules apply to Ecderha or was that ignored? How many continuous posts do you recommend and what timeframes? If uses are sending reports here, I will do the same.
So there is no set rule about making 9 continuous posts? is there a set number for link sequence on this to that would be considered flooding? I don't want to screw up again which is why I am asking these questions, not to upset your or anyone else.No link sequence was detected in Ecderha's posts. You said that you were playing a game and it 'll not be allowed. It is not open to discussion.
There has long been an opinion in open spaces that one must allow any content, as long as it's not against the rules, to adhere to freedom of speech. Moderators should not be in the position of deciding who is truthful and who is not. As the famous saying goes, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
I thought this was an unbias forum and not an echo chamber? How am I lying if Ecderha is also lying showing posts from Ukraine showing war footage from months ago as something new? Again, I am hoping the admin tells me how many links for each continous posts i can make because I can't match another users posts. Its best to avoid accusations that I am showing too much footage that is not favorable to people's opinion of the war here. If Ecderha can make 9 posts with one link each than i will do the same instead of 5 that is all. A line needs to be set in order for me to know if I am crossing it or not.There has long been an opinion in open spaces that one must allow any content, as long as it's not against the rules, to adhere to freedom of speech. Moderators should not be in the position of deciding who is truthful and who is not. As the famous saying goes, "I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your right to say it."
While people living in free societies consider this a virtue, many Russians consider this a weakness. A weakness that they abuse. In the age of mass online media, it is easy to spam a huge amount of content to dilute and make it harder to see the opposing viewpoint. There is too much to check, too much to disprove. And even if you do disprove it, arguing against it forces you to repeat the lie and ensure more people see it over other content. Furthermore even if you disprove it, the stink remains. This is a technique commonly used by politicians; throw a wild accusation and force your opponent to either ignore it (why is he ignoring it?) or spend time defending against it (in which case everyone sees the accusation).
This becomes particularly effective when one side has a higher standard for adhering to truth than the other. Some people would not lower themselves to post content that they believe could be false, no matter how flattering that content is to their views. Others, as I previously mentioned, abuse this.
Let me draw a parallel. A physics forum where a member rejects the notion of a round earth. No matter how many times other members disprove his theories, he continues to make multiple posts per day with images, videos and "proofs". I chose the quote above for a reason. Sometimes there can be arguments about what is true. This is not one of those cases; the text in Ukrainian says nothing of the kind, you and your source are simply lying. But, since most people here don't speak Ukrainian, your post will remain and be looked at with the same degree of truthfulness as all others.
You will no doubt respond with something about the ghost of Kyiv and other whataboutism. Yet I think the entirety of our community active in this topic have arrived at the conclusion that you post more lies than any other user. You're simply taking advantage of the openness of this forum, polluting it in the process to serve your own motives.
putins one of main propagandists. 20 absolutely mental minutes of Solovyov.
russians believe to such person when he start talking/lying
I thought this was an unbias forum and not an echo chamber? How am I lying if Ecderha is also lying showing posts from Ukraine showing war footage from months ago as something new? Again, I am hoping the admin tells me how many links for each continous posts i can make because I can't match another users posts. Its best to avoid accusations that I am showing too much footage that is not favorable to people's opinion of the war here. If Ecderha can make 9 posts with one link each than i will do the same instead of 5 that is all. A line needs to be set in order for me to know if I am crossing it or not.
Man there is a huge difference in what Ecderha does, IMO is to summarize what the thinks it's worth to mention here, and we can find easily sources or context on them.
What you are doing is just flooding the topic with RU posts/thoughts/propaganda without context, locations, sources in many of the cases and mentioning the same twitter account filling your messages in consecutive posts, some times even as screenshots...
If you find interesting for people on this forum to follow some twitter accounts, just post here what it could be useful to follow given the topic of the forum, paste the links of twitter accounts like Sprintero, Zoka or Geroman. If forum members find interesting to follow them they'll do.
And there is no such "artificial balance" of opinions of forum members, ppl here should be mature enough to create a free opinion not based on controversial material or misleading sources. That should be out of the topic.
I already DMd the admins I am done discussing this.Man there is a huge difference in what Ecderha does, IMO is to summarize what the thinks it's worth to mention here, and we can find easily sources or context on them.
What you are doing is just flooding the topic with RU posts/thoughts/propaganda without context, locations, sources in many of the cases and mentioning the same twitter account filling your messages in consecutive posts, some times even as screenshots...
If you find interesting for people on this forum to follow some twitter accounts, just post here what it could be useful to follow given the topic of the forum, paste the links of twitter accounts like Sprintero, Zoka or Geroman. If forum members find interesting to follow them they'll do.
And there is no such "artificial balance" of opinions of forum members, ppl here should be mature enough to create a free opinion not based on controversial material or misleading sources. That should be out of the topic.