Latest Thread
Here is a step by step to be a "Normal" person discussing AD Loss.Looks like total failure of Russia's S-300 / S-400 battery at Belbek airfield. The battery itself was the target and the ATACMS missiles look to have ripped right through it.
This is all about Western political will power. If the desire exists to provide Ukraine with enough ATACMS, JASSMS, Stormshadow and SCALP-EG, Ukraine will have the capacity to seriously damage Russian air defense capability and hammer Crimea and Russia's air force bases.
ATACMS: 200
JASSM: 200
Stormshadow: 100
SCALP-EG: 100
600 long range strikes missiles in 2024 is all it would really take to destroy tens of billions of dollars of Russian hardware and smash various Russian air fields, radar sites and ammunition depots.
1. I didn't state that tens of billions in damages has been caused. I'm stating that if you saturate Russian Air Force bases and RADAR installations with ballistic and cruise missiles, tens of billions of dollars worth of damage could be done over the course of the year. That includes destroyed air defense, aircraft on the ground and airport infrastructure including runways, fuel depots, ammunition storage, RADARs, etc.Here is a step by step to be a "Normal" person discussing AD Loss.
1.Is the system on ?
2.If it's on what is the coverage and limitations ?
3.If the target is in the coverage and envelope, how many the targets are ?
4.Does the system got saturated?
Correct me if I'm wrong but as I understand it there were ten ATACM in the assault with one successfully hitting a military target. Assuming that the other nine didn't fall out of the sky of their own accord it means that they were shot down. What we don't know but a 90% system success rate against a ten volley is probably a result most AD managements would count as a win.
I dont where you are getting 10 billion dollars worth of equipment it's not like one air defense radar costs as much as one US aircraft carrier which are sinkable with hypersonic missiles as well.
View attachment 68039
600 were used in desert storm and iraqi freedom, you might need more than 600.
The draft looks reasonable enough, Ukraine could've agreed except for the 7th point, however, Russia does have a reputation not holding up to commitments or pacts.lets read what your own source says 1st.
View attachment 68018
1st sentence is correct
the word imply on the 2nd sentence means "strongly suggest", meaning there was no written agreement they were demanding from NATO that it was guaranteed, so from your own sentence they did not demand removal of western troops into regards of the agreements they wanted with Ukraine.
The only agreements they wanted before Boris Johnson told the Ukrainians not to do it was written here.
View attachment 68019
Of course, this when Ukraine for 8 years violated the Minsk agreements multiple times. Thanks to Johnson the Russians will probably be demanding more things from Ukraine once the war is over.
Gloating about a destroyed S-400 radar won't stabilize the front line and halt the progressive collapse of Ukrainian position.1. I didn't state that tens of billions in damages has been caused. I'm stating that if you saturate Russian Air Force bases and RADAR installations with ballistic and cruise missiles, tens of billions of dollars worth of damage could be done over the course of the year. That includes destroyed air defense, aircraft on the ground and airport infrastructure including runways, fuel depots, ammunition storage, RADARs, etc.
2. My suggestion of sending 600 ATACMS ballistic missiles and Stormshadow / SCALP-EG and JASSM cruise missiles was for 2024 alone. USA produces more than 500 ATACMS each year and has the capacity to produce between 500-1000 JASSMs per year. Many more would have to be committed in 2025 and beyond. 600 is just a start, if the goal is smashing the Russian Air Force facilities in Crimea and the Russian regions most adjacent to Ukraine.
But lets face it, russia is North Korea of the XXI century. The REAL battle is US vs China (and China has every chance to win it) and this is only proxy war.
The REAL battle is US vs China (and China has every chance to win it) and this is only proxy war.
You know and I know that this war will not end EVEN if Ukraine is somehow defeated.
Russia is all in and now they CANT go back so they will fight until they are defeated.
I would prefer for Ukraine to do it. If not then there is time for war russia vs Baltic countries, Poland, Finland and maybe few more Europian countries.
FINALLY Ukraine is starting to attack russia, not their own teriitory occupied by putinokios troops like Donbas and Crimea but real russia like Novorossiysk base.