Russian soldier is now on Tamerlane mod.
Why did you decide that Tamerlane is more cruel than, say, Napoleon or Hitler?
This is the point of view of Western, Russian and Christian historians in general.
In their opinion, Alexander is a great and talented commander.
And Atilla is just a barbarian.
Scipio Africanus is good, but Hannibal is an aggressor, and therefore bad.
Genghis Khan is a villain, and Napoleon is kind, even to the point of indecency.
That is, comparison according to different criteria. Regarding
Napoleon is compared with his military talent, and in relation to Genghis Khan - with his imaginary cruelty. Although it is debatable which of them killed more people.
And it turns out that all the commanders of the West are good and talented, and all the Eastern ones are bloodthirsty barbarians.
After all, this is obvious and natural. In their opinion
But if we discard thеsе false statements, invented by «historians» over the centuries, we will see a completely different picture!
Genghis Khan conquered 10 times (!!!) more territory than Iskander the «great», deliberately increased by the West

That is, Alexander was not so much great, but simply a dwarf compared to the greatest commander - Genghis Khan...etc
And so in everything
If we take the same criteria for comparison, then
the entire Western construct about the imaginary moral superiority of the West over the East will instantly collapse...
You, Gary, have fallen into a trap
