Can't figure out if you are trolling or asking legitimate questions, but I'll bite on your questions regarding the West's military ramp up. Here are just SOME examples of the more than $1.5 Trillion usd worth of new weapons platforms that the West has ordered recently.
USA
- 2 Gerald Ford Class ACCs
- 2 America Class ASSs
- 10 Arleigh Burke Class Destroyers
- 3 Zumwalt Class Destroyers
- 10 Virginia Class Attack Submarines
- 104 F-15EX Eagle II Fighter Jets
- 63 F-35A Fighter Jets
- 204 F-35C Fighter Jets
- 76 F-18 Super Hornet Fighter Jets
- 200 M109A7 155mm Howitzers
- 504 M10 Booker LBTs
- 300 DVHA1 Stryker APCs
- 300 Bradley A4 IFVs
- 240 ACV IFVs
- 16,901 JLTVs
Canada
Purchases
- 88 F-35s Fighter Jets
- 15 River Class Frigates
- 360 LAV 6.0 IFVs
Poland
Purchases
- 96 AH-64E Apache Helicopters
- 32 AW149 Helicopters
- 138 Narew Air Defense Launchers
- 48 Patriot Air Defense Launchers
- 824 K9 Thunder 155mm Howitzers
- 152 Krab 155mm Howitzers
- 290 K239 Chunmoo 239mm MLRS
- 506 M142 HIMARS
- 122 M120 RAK 120mm Mortars
- 1000 K2 Black Panther MBTs
- 250 M1A2 Abrams MBTs
- 1000 BWP Borsuk IFVs
- 302 KTO Rosomak IFVs
Britain
Purchases
- 8 Type 26 Frigates
- 4 Trident Missile Submarines
- 138 F-35B Fighter Aircraft
- 148 Challenger 3 MBTs
- 589 Ajax IFVs
- 623 Boxer IFVs
- 61 M270 MLRS
- 200 RCH-155 155mm Howitzers
Germany
Purchases
- 3 Patriot Air Defense Batteries
- 20 Eurofighter Fighter Jets
- 77 Airbus H145M Attack Helicopters
- 105 Leopard 2A7A1 MBTs
- 50 SPZ Puma IFVs
- 122 Boxer IFVs
- 100 Boxer 155mm Howitzers
France
Purchases
- 8 SAMP/T Air Defense Systems
- 42 Rafale Fighter Jets
- 200 Leclerc XLR MBTs
- 300 EBRC Jaguar LBTs
- 627 VBCI IFVs
- 1872 VMBR Griffon APCs
- 109 CAESAR NG 155mm Howitzers
Italy
Purchases
- 10 SAMP/T NG Air Defense Systems
- 15 F-35A Fighter Jets
- 10 F-35B Fighter Jets
- 24 Eurofighter Fighter Jets
- 200 KF-51 Panther MBTs
- 150 Centauro II Tank Destroyers
- 630 VBM Freccia IFVs
- 350 Lynx IFVs
Czech Republic
Purchases
- 24 F-35A Fighter Jets
- 77 Leopard 2A8 MBTs
- 239 CV90 Mark IV IFvs
- 126 Pandur II IFVs
Again, these are just SOME examples. Almost every NATO country has announced substantial spending increases and nost have made equipment purchases. This doesn't even address all of the munitions and technology that the West is investing in.
Before you go accuse another person that they are trolling try to directly answer their questions or arguements which you have failed repeatedly to do. You gave me contracts, but there is an issue with that. When were those contracts signed and when are the full deliveries of those contracts suppose to take place?
Example: Poland signs a contract for 250 M1a2s on April 5, 2022 the full delivery is somewhere in 2025-2026 with assumptions there are no delays. Do you know how many tanks Russia gets a month to get to 32-44 months? I will do some math here with all the equipment than we can make comparisons. If I am wrong than please prove it to me that I am wrong.
Your contract numbers for land force, I will get to the sea and airforce stuff a little later after this.
Howitzers: 1,585
MBTs: 2,430(I added the centauro tanks here)
APCs: 2,112
IFVs: 6,007(added the booker LBTs here)
MLRS: 567(I am sure the US made additional orders of HIMARS for themselves care to add that later here?)
Since the information you provided to me was inadequate you have homework or maybe a school project with other users here that can assist you for sharing the same ideals.
-When were these contracts made?
-are they 1 year, 2 year, 5 year, 10 year or 20 year contracts?
-Are there any delays in production like increase in energy cost issues?
-When these orders were made, were any of them sent to ukraine or this came from their existing stockpile?(Example: US gets 300 strykers and they sent some of those to ukraine where lancets on lostarmour.ru record their destruction)
-Are these actual written contracts or what they want to get?
The Russians keep it simple and stupid for their audience like this.
-https://pikabu.ru/story/popyitka_rasschitat_skolko_v_rossii_proizvoditsya_voennoy_tekhnikitankov__vyivodyi_9756245?ysclid=m3q0hy48qv738997079
997 tanks got produced in 9 months(they are supposedly opening 2 more tank plants later) So basically 2 in a half years Russia would already have all the MBT contracts of NATO and I am very sure some of those MBT deliveries would take more than 2 in a half years. This one is more up to date in 2024 than the 2023 graph below.
-APCs Russia can meet the NATO requirement in 22 months
-IFVs I dont see on the list
https://en.defence-ua.com/industrie...2025_and_scale_up_bmp_3_production-11054.html
-3000 IFVs a year for production means Russia can meet NATO's requirement in 2 years.
-Dont see tornado MLRS systems on list and only thing mentioned was several times its production.
There are multiple disadvantages NATO has to deal with.
1. the painfully obvious of where are the western equivalent deliveries of Ka-52s Mi-35s and M-28s? Russians upload a fuck load of LMUR strike footages of the war on ukrainian armored vehicles.
2.Missile advantage is on Russia's side with short- and long-range kamikaze drones.
3. Based on experience Russians have taken countermeasures with cages, ERA layouts that make it difficult for drones to strike, EW systems. NATO has not shown AFAIK to give Ukraine a helping hand on countermeasures which I would assume they would do as bad as Ukraine entering this conflict. Only improvement I saw was future upgrades for Strykers to have EW systems and 20 kilowatt lasers.
4.Claims of Russia having longer range strike howitzers and MLRS systems.
5. Russia has alot of ongoing projects of newer and better tanks, MLRS systems, Howitzers, and specialized armoured vehicles like the Derivatsya 57mm.
Elaborate more on the technology part since I do know Russia has alot of projects. Russia has enough missiles and drones to deal with ships and aircraft bases which is why NATO will be forced into a ground war with Russia anyways and I have not even added China into the equation yet.
It has taken Russia 3 friggen years and the destruction of a significant portion of their Soviet stockpile, to take 20% of Ukraine, supplied with mostly obsolete western army equipment pulled out of storage, no relavent air force assets until recently and no naval assets...
Just 2 in half years, ohh come on I know some wars that took the U.S. a little bit far longer lol. And I assure you what Russia destroyed is far greater than what the US has destroyed in the middle east that its not even comparable. Naval assets? They do have quite a lot of submarines that carry quite a lot of missiles that are more on the advanced sophisticated side where 1 missile can do the trick for 1 Naval target.
In a non-nuclear environment, NATO would absolutely abuse Russia. In a world in which NATO stepped in to push Russia out of Ukraine, Putin would come to the negotiating table within hours with his tail between his legs looking for a deal. Otherwise, NATO would rain absolute he'll down on his army. Russia can't even establish air supremacy over Ukraine.
Russia alone has more manpower, artillery fire and equipment than Europe does. The US has a shitload of active duty troops and firepower they can bring along, but the major problem to that is they have to cross a large body of sea which is time consuming with whatever available manpower that offers which will get targetted by coastal and aerial BMS, or cruise missiles/ scramjet missiles.
Let's just for arguments sake say somehow Europe does beat the Russians back with less manpower, equipment and firepower. Do you think the Chinese would want NATO completely surrounding them since they know they are as hated as the Russians are by the west?
If 500 (just a fraction) 4th and 5th Generation F-35s, F-22s, F-18s, F-15s, Eurofighters, Rafales, etc showed in support of Ukraine, the war would virtually be over. The West would establish air supremacy within a week. Russia's Air Force would retreat back into the Russian interior and the war would come to a quick conclusion.
I think everyone in this forum saw how invincible those F-35s were when they blew up in Israel. The Russians have enough missiles and drones with better precision and countermeasures to blow up air bases as far as those aircrafts combat ranges can take them from Russia. The Russians have started photonic integrated circuits production 2 weeks ago meaning in some coming years the Russians will be utilizing photonic radars with miniature airbreathing engines that would make 4th gen aircrafts blow up 5th gens depending how much missiles they can carry for each 5th gen aircraft targeted and this can get combined with modernized S-400, S-350, modernized S-300s S-500, S-550 or A-235 missiles systems assuming photonic radars are being developed for these systems as well. Su-75s and Su-70s can serve as cheap stealth air to air missile UAV carriers for the Su-57 since radars like photonic radars in the millimeter wave can track 100s of targets. And if worse comes to worse Russia can share all their technology with China in a major war and based on their electronics and missile production I say good luck facing something that has better production, enough manpower, alot of satellites and received a technological leap from the Russians.
You can further elaborate with me if you want?
. 
has committed $2.3 Billion usd worth if military support for Ukraine in 2025. The aid will consist of armor, small arms, technology and training for the Ukrainian military. 
