Indonesia Casual Discussion Warkop Indonesia

Mejikuhibiu

Active member
Messages
74
Reactions
52
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
From defensopedia ig say that ukraine has taking back mariupol and shchastya. n 40 ukraine soldier has been killed
 

Umigami

Experienced member
Moderator
Indonesia Moderator
Messages
5,992
Reactions
5 4,848
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Disini ada yg tahu dimana bisa lihat peta update konflik?
 

keadno

Member
Messages
10
Reactions
3
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Screenshot_20220224-182112_YouTube.jpg


Baru tau ada live stream.

Btw itu BTR putar balik, sekitar 15mnt sebelumnya ada Pantsir menuju kiev.
 

HellFireIndo

Committed member
Messages
284
Reactions
358
If done properly Ukraine could and should hold Kharkiv and many major cities for a year or two. If the rebels could hold Aleppo for almost 5 year and Isis could hold Mosul for 9 months. Ukraine, whatever discrepancy in weaponry it has should hold the city for that long I'm optimistic. Kiev and Kharkiv is quite a big city.

The keyword here is done properly.
Not a chance if we assume Russia is eager to launch an intensive saturation attack, confining themselves to Kyiv will only present a juicy target for the Russians. The Ukrainians will commit a blunder by retreating to any single point because that's literally putting themselves into a corner. What happens next is a siege, a siege is a terrible thing, even if the attacker ultimately retreats after a time, the defender would be in far worse condition by then. That's assuming they gonna win, but they cannot even resist the Russian advance, and instead break immediately.

So the idea to retreat and try to hold this or that city and expect to successfully hold it for 2 years is an unrealistic scenario. More so pulling that idea when Russia is master of artillery, where on the very first day of the war they are able to saturate multiple cities at once, confining troops only to Kyiv and Kharkiv will also allow the Russian to trap, and concentrate fire on only a few key positions. This will benefit the Russians instead, it is a blunder that will make the Russians basically checkmate Ukrainian military (the imaginary version with unlimited morale).

This is literally a repeat of the 1870 France-Prussia war, where the French were losing on the open battle and they instead retreat to Sedan and Paris with that exact same thinking. Then they lose anyway, can only hold for a few months under constant German artillery attack before surrendering. The French were pinned down, unable to get out, and the Germans practically can do anything in France. Heck, they mocked the French by coronating their Emperor at Versailles, showing that they practically beat the French even before the war ended, that's just how big the blunder was.

If a plan cannot survive idiots, cowards, tired and starving soldiers, then the plan is bad and fragile. Not all leaders and commanders are geniuses and no one should expect them to be ("done properly"). Different contexts also matter as unconventional war cannot compare to conventional one, in scale, in intensity, in tactics, in resource, in social-political factors. ME Militias fighting ISIS, is not the same as Ukraine fighting Russia, one is undisciplined soldier vs rebel group, one is military vs military in a full-scale military invasion.
 

Mejikuhibiu

Active member
Messages
74
Reactions
52
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
bisa bertahan berapa lama tu Ukraine
Mungkin 1 atau 2 hari lg.. di ig defenseview disebut konvoi militer rusia dihajar habis dfn javelin.
Dan Nato tidak akan mengirimkan pasukan tempur ke ukraina.. langkah bijak dr nato nurut gw.. stock market rusia sdh anjlok 50% perhari ini..
 

Madokafc

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
5,903
Reactions
4 10,020
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Antara
Ukrain kalah duluan atau ekonomi rusia jatuh mana dulu nih

Tergantung respon UN, NATO dan Uni Eropa. Tapi menurut gua pribadi negara negara kek Polandia, Latvia, Bulgaria, Rumania, Hungaria dkk pasti bakalan ngirim support medis, senjata dan bakalan ada "volunteer" yang dikirim ke Ukraina. Mereka bakalan bertindak duluan ketimbang negara negara NATO seperti Inggris, Perancis Jerman atau bahkan USA. Ini berkaitan dengan prospek ancaman Russia yang nyata buat mereka
 

RajaSultanKing

Active member
Messages
85
Reactions
62
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Tergantung respon UN, NATO dan Uni Eropa. Tapi menurut gua pribadi negara negara kek Polandia, Latvia, Bulgaria, Rumania, Hungaria dkk pasti bakalan ngirim support medis, senjata dan bakalan ada "volunteer" yang dikirim ke Ukraina. Mereka bakalan bertindak duluan ketimbang negara negara NATO seperti Inggris, Perancis Jerman atau bahkan USA. Ini berkaitan dengan prospek ancaman Russia yang nyata buat mereka

yang di bold sepertinya gak akan terlalu bermain di konflik ini mengingat mereka juga punya hubungan baik dengan Rusia ditambah juga beberapa warga mereka yang right-wing garis keras ada yang jadi volunteer di sisi DPR/LPR

kemungkinan besar baltic states (estii, latvia, lithuania), Poland dan Romania yang bakal mulai massive mobilization

lagipula EU terutama Jerman, Prancis, UK sama Nordic States diem2 mereka juga punya ketergantungan sama gas Rusia, kalo di cut sama Rusia mau masak dan generate electricity pake apa mereka? kembali ke batu bara? ntar diamuk SJW
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom