I don’t know why, but number and playing a long game always be the main talking points. There’s no one made time table that shown, “at this year, Muslims as a largest human groups will massacre the Jews”, there’s no one guarantee what you say gonna happen or make sure that’s gonna happen.
Because it's a long game, a long game imply that the situations and conditions will be there for a very LOOOOONG time, independent of what a particular individual wants.
Of course there's no guarantee of what will happen, during the peak of the
Belle Epoch no one can even imagine, let alone guarantee that Europe will stay a colonial power for how many long. But for the eagle eyed, they will notice that as the standard of living rises, the more access to education common Europeans and their colonial subject could get the more likely the idea of anti-colonialism spread among the population. Add that to the relative success of the "Yellow monkeys" against the Russians in 1905 and you get the situations and conditions where colonialism is increasingly unpopular among Europeans themselves and eventually their subjects.
The situation is, the Americans are actually at their last cycle, that's a condition that will stay for until they eventually end, like all empires before.
We don't know for how long the Americans will stay powerful enough to babysit their dogs in the Middle East, but if it happens that they lose (they'll lose it anyway) the capability to do such. I must say, their pet project in the Middle East is in big trouble.
And Muslims is not single entity answer to one authority. It is not a Catholics let say, that Pope Urban II had the calling to took the Holy Land then all including Kings with armies gonna answer the call. Muslims maybe sharing emotional bond, but does that mean their actions would also same?
Correct, but then again it's not something we can't correct. That's why there's the Da'wa/preaching to begin with. And with a common enemy to point our fingers into, it's going to be easier (in the long run) to turn our general division into something that could unite us.
One of the biggest blessing in disguise of Muslims in the 21st century is we don't actually have a single people to look up into and listen. If there's an Islamic equivalent to the Pope, then it'll be easier for our enemies to use him for the enemy's interests to silence us.
In fact, Muslims are in general very dissatisfied with their ruler (as seen in the Middle East). So for example, the West can't use Bin Salman as a voice to muffle the anger of Muslims worldwide.
Btw, thing above was the reason why back then Catholics was seen as not fit to be government officials, especially in Protestants (Christian whose free from Vatican authority) dominated society. They seen as having dual or double allegiance. I’m kind of think Muslims kind of like that too tho, no offense
No offense as well, but I don't trust the Christians as well especially in Indonesia. It's not like I'm not aware that they have significant bond with the West and in your case, it's not like I haven't notice your fondness with American foreign agent working on political meddling in our country.
