Fighter_35
Contributor
Wow, still trying to find a good thing in a deal with BMC??1. if it is BMC that is going to do the modernisation, then it is under new ownership. Give them a chance to correct all the wrongs made in the past.
2. Somebody has to start this modernisation. My understanding is Aselsan and Roketsan are in charge of this modernisation.
3. Current administration may be trying to clean BMC’s badly tarnished name by giving the actual work to Aselsan and Roketsan. (Good try!!)
4. There is nothing to mess up! These tanks are like metal coffins as they are. We saw how many of them were knocked out in quick succession in Al Bab Syria. They should not be in front line as they are.
5. As long as it is Aselsan and Roketsan doing this modernisation we should have full confidence in their work.
- it does not matter who is in charge of BMC!! It is the capability of the company first!! A good management can not make something out of nothing!!
-if Aselsan and roketsan are in charge , why the hell is BMC is prime contractor but not subcontractor?? To give easy money to BMC instead of state companies?? Or BMC will make more money instead of state companies??
-additionally, Leo tanks are our most modern tanks , with only roketsan add on armor and Aselsan self defense system, they will be top notch. No need to give more money to BMC!!!