Is this a mockup? Or a real prototype?View attachment 44738
View attachment 44739
There are changes to the shape of the wings. Canards might've gotten a little larger too, not really sure. Probably a perspective thingy.
Well Baykar develops aircraft differently... So honestly, I can't really tell. They're using it for something that's for sure.Is this a mockup? Or a real prototype?
i reckon theyll move like the canards as well.Why do the wings not align properly with the fuselage?
I don't think so. The canards look fine to me.i reckon theyll move like the canards as well.
think of the rear-wheel steering systems on the big luxury SUVs. the wings will move a little to help with the maneuverability.I don't think so. The canards look fine to me.
You misunderstood. Or perhaps I misunderstood the original comment. I know how a canard works manthink of the rear-wheel steering systems on the big luxury SUVs. the wings will move a little to help with the maneuverability.
i think you misunderstood. luckily i wrote my theory about this before. hereOr perhaps I misunderstood the original comment
it makes SO MUCH sense.
Honestly the wings doesnt even have to move that much. Rear-wheel steering racks in modern cars turn 5 degrees at most and the difference it makes is STAGGERING.
- KIZILELMA doesn't have a pilot in it, so as long as the airframe is up to the task, 20-30 G's could be achievable and beneficial.
- KIZILELMA is designed to be STOBAR compliant, that means aircraft launching on its on power, with only the ship's speed assisting take-off. having the entire wing actuated is bound to help with lift. Might also help with landing.
I hope BAYKAR patented this. its a really innovative approach to making planes and the potential makes me drool.
I got what you meant now.i think you misunderstood. luckily i wrote my theory about this before. here
But in official renderings we saw Kizilelma with a conventional configuration. Your theory is dope as heck, but I dunno. We will have to wait and see.i think you misunderstood. luckily i wrote my theory about this before. here
Baykar calls it a "Prototype production development model".Is this a mockup? Or a real prototype?
It is a real prototype. It might be used as a decoration later but it is a real prototypeIt's not the real prototype. It's for reviewing the aircrafts shape and probably will be used as a mockup for decoration.
Then why it doesn't have any structural parts? Wings are sticked there with adhesive material, you can see it in older photos.It is a real prototype. It might be used as a decoration later but it is a real prototype
The first flight of the MIUS will be done in the first half of 2023. There is less than a year left. Probably around 10 months or so. I expect the first flight to happen in March, April, or May before the elections.
where's TB3? we have heard nothing about it for a while nowIt is a real prototype. It might be used as a decoration later but it is a real prototype
The first flight of the MIUS will be done in the first half of 2023. There is less than a year left. Probably around 10 months or so. I expect the first flight to happen in March, April, or May before the elections.
Stop posting garbage on this forum.Then why it doesn't have any structural parts? Wings are sticked there with adhesive material, you can see it in older photos.
It is like the shell of a bug, the skin holds the plane together. The body is the main structural part. Landing gear is the second most important structural part and it will be integrated when it is ready, like all other parts. I think.Then why it doesn't have any structural parts? Wings are sticked there with adhesive material, you can see it in older photos.