F16 Block 30/40/50 aircraft will have common configuration
- Murad AESA
- FEWS AESA EW Self Protection Suit
- Gokdoğan BVR
For helicopters?
I wonder hows BEOS, DAS (NAR) and IRST is going
F16 Block 30/40/50 aircraft will have common configuration
View attachment 50976
- Murad AESA
- FEWS AESA EW Self Protection Suit
- Gokdoğan BVR
I think in order to keep negotiation doors open and also to be able to recoupe some of the 1.4 billion dollars we paid for the F35s we never received, we are keeping the F16V70 project alive.if the upgrading of Block 40 and 50 are possible then the whole F-16 deal should be cancelled.
if we can upgrade those planes ourselves it makes no sense to pay the Americans for the same upgrade. Also it would be a nice middle finger to those who slobbered around that they wouldn’t allow the deal to go through.
Buying new F16 Block 70 never made sense to me as we would get the first aircraft in like 5 years after signing the contract unless they are able to get production rights and we can manufacture the planes in Turkey.
instead we should try to order 48 EF T4 and cement partnerships with the Brits.
I think in order to keep negotiation doors open and also to be able to recoupe some of the 1.4 billion dollars we paid for the F35s we never received, we are keeping the F16V70 project alive.
Also we need to make up the numbers missing and/or will be missing in our f16 fleet for the interim period. But as you rightfully pointed out this could be compensated with EF2000 planes, provided we don’t run in to problems with the German side..
There is also the time issue. Fitting out couple of hundred f16s with Ozgur avionics and Murad Aesa radar is going to take a fair bit of time and money. F16V70 project can shorten this time as workload and financing the project will have been shared between us and the US. (I am thinking that we are looking for some form of credit scheme between governments to finance the f16V70 project)
But at the end of it we are not without options and could go for it on our own.
Yes the biggest issues are recouping the money from the JSF program and time.
But I think the money could be recouped in a smarter way. Why not order AAM(AIM-120-D, AIM-9X Block II-II+) and various pods (Sniper, Legion IRST) for the existing fleet.
Time is a sensitive topic. We don’t know how fast LM would be able to modernize our planes as other countries will have priority due to having put in their orders earlier and due to foreign policy reasons for the US. We already saw Taiwan being pushed to the head of the line by the Pentagon. Who is to say they won’t push us down the ladder and delay the production and modernization of our planes because “reasons”.
maybe sharing the work between TAI and LM would circumvent this.
Then again one of the cons of having the Block 70 upgrade will be not being able to integrate Gökhan Ramjet AAM.
On another topic.
Could we offer this upgrade package to countries with older F-16? Pakistan as an example?
I think people don't really get TuAF's future planning. What I get from open sources as an amateur is this:Özgür project will be a long one TAF is planning to upgrade all block 30-40-50 fighters before the FOC of the first MMU squadron(2030). The project will gain pace starting from 2024 after Murad AESA, FEWS, and national AA missiles are integrated into F-16.
Why canibalize? TAI can manufacture almost all parts and certain parts that are not produced is because it is cheaper to import themI agree, but we use them like 93 Renault Toros already. These planes will start to cause excessive reliability and maintainance problems in about five years (that's my uneducated guess, btw). We need to be ready to cannibalize some to keep others airworthy, so they can fulfill the role I described.
We would have more firepower with less F-16's that way and it would be temporary anyway, because TF-X comes after a few years of what I described.
I haven't thought about it that way, I think you're right. Question, if we replace and modernize every single part of the plane over a period of time, is it technically the same plane?Why canibalize? TAI can manufacture almost all parts and certain parts that are not produced is because it is cheaper to import them
Well, with the blk30 we practically do this already.I haven't thought about it that way, I think you're right. Question, if we replace and modernize every single part of the plane over a period of time, is it technically the same plane?
Edit: With regards to law and treaties and such.
If the car salesman is an obnoxious bully brimming with hubris who refuses to sell the newer car...Well, with the blk30 we practically do this already.
But replacing all single parts does not make sense, buying a brand new more modern fighter over time makes more sense. Do you want to use a 2000 model Mercedes of which you replace all parts or do you want to have a 2022 model?
Exactly, with Blk 30 we do it out of embargoes not because it is financially the best solutionIf the car salesman is an obnoxious bully brimming with hubris who refuses to sell the newer car...
There is no old aircraft, there is under maintenance. Sometimes you just want to keep the old model with modification, just like the USA keeps the B-52 fleet instead of changing them with a brand new B-2.Well, with the blk30 we practically do this already.
But replacing all single parts does not make sense, buying a brand new more modern fighter over time makes more sense. Do you want to use a 2000 model Mercedes of which you replace all parts or do you want to have a 2022 model?