Anka-3
There will be many innovations on the data communication side of the next generation fighter jets. This is already a major headache for the US Air Force. Here is very good article about it:
Click here for the full article
just a foot note; As a part of stealth concept they use low probability of intercept (LPI) datalinks on the F-22 and the F-35 series, funy thing is until recently F35 and F 22 could not share data with each other but only with their kind. İt was a huge handicap. They are working on it. Now they can share data with each other via a third plane, in one experiment with an U 2S with communications gateway payload guess it was last year.
But you have a point they can and they are using Link 16 in some cases, when They use link 16 you have higher chances to spot and track the aircraft via those emissions. in Full stealth mode they only use The MADL and IFDL systems which are both designed to be low probability of intercept/low probability of detection (LPI/LPD) systems that enable F-35 and the F-22 to communicate with their kind while still remaining as stealthy as possible
As DARPA puts it Millimeter wave links provide physical security, but pose networking challenges!
Does this illustration (Anka-3) just look so ugly to only me?
+Does this illustration (Anka-3) just look so ugly to only me?
it looks beautiful to me? Am I ok?Does this illustration (Anka-3) just look so ugly to only me?
Probably you are drunk.it looks beautiful to me? Am I ok?
I was giving these "leaks" the benefit of the doubt but now I am sure this is just an amateur fan render. There's an "Unreal Productions" watermark. One of the weapon pylons is floating in mid air. The bomb bay doors are square instead of serrated. Actually, all the panels are non-serrated. The whole rear section makes no sense in terms of stealth.
"Unreal Productions" edits/enhances photos on Twitter. He didn't create the photos. The photos originated from a newspaper, but we have confirmation from members that the rendering of the Anka 3 is very similar to the real thing.I was giving these "leaks" the benefit of the doubt but now I am sure this is just an amateur fan render. There's an "Unreal Productions" watermark. One of the weapon pylons is floating in mid air. The bomb bay doors are square instead of serrated. Actually, all the panels are non-serrated. The whole rear section makes no sense in terms of stealth.
I know, which is why I was suspending judgement until more info came out, but IMO there's no chance what is seen in those pics is the actual TISU design. It may be generally similar to the real TISU, i.e., stealthy flying wing, but that's it."Unreal Productions" edits/enhances photos on Twitter. He didn't create the photos. The photos originated from a newspaper, but we have confirmation from members that the rendering of the Anka 3 is very similar to the real thing.
I guess everyone will agree here that it will be the legit next gen proper stealth flying wing or form UAV. It was highly expected, anticipated by defense circles anyways. Accordingly it is only normal to have some common features of the class, mainly flying wing form."Unreal Productions" edits/enhances photos on Twitter. He didn't create the photos. The photos originated from a newspaper, but we have confirmation from members that the rendering of the Anka 3 is very similar to the real thing.
Exactly. General features are almost agreed upon but I wouldn‘t wanna - unless TAI or MoD or SSM say otherwise - comment on this so called “ANKA 3 rendering“ eitherI know, which is why I was suspending judgement until more info came out, but IMO there's no chance what is seen in those pics is the actual TISU design. It may be generally similar to the real TISU, i.e., stealthy flying wing, but that's it.
KizilElma <> J-20 View attachment 51910
do you think they will reduce the number of actuators under the wing? The current 10 are compromising stealth and their cover design isn’t optimal
Baykar probably doesn't have any actuators with enough performance for Kızılelma. So they split up the ailerons. They would replace them with better ones.do you think they will reduce the number of actuators under the wing? The current 10 are compromising stealth and their cover design isn’t optimal