There is making observations and then disregarding the work of experts as "mistakes" based on a comparison between mock-ups/cgi models and this prototype based on 2 photos that look like they were taken with a potato from terrible angles.
Pretty much what is the issue is about. The angle, the lens, fov and quality of the image. It looks much better to naked eye and will look much better from a farther position with a proper lens.
I'll be making a general comment. I've seen a lot of "they did this, they did that" nonsense on the internet today. There is no right or wrong in this sense. There are advantages and disadvantages related to every design. TAI, with the consulting they got from BAE Systems, has come up with a DESIGN. I guarantee every TAI employee who is currently reading our "design debates" are laughing their asses off. Here is the thing, you can't question a complex aircraft's aerodynamics without proper CFD analysis. You can't question its LO characteristics either. You don't have the same tools as they do. So let's all be done with it. I would also like to remind our fellow forum members that we are still looking at the same aircraft we saw on the final assembly line a couple of months ago. This went on for wayyy too long.
Without a proper CFD analysis unless you are into supersonic fluid dynamics for a certain term as mininum.
Asked a friend, out of curiosity after seeing people's rage, whom i trust with and who has had 15+ years experience with fluid dynamics in academis this was his response;
"Bro i have not studied supersonic or compressible flows and i may not answer this question."
Meanwhile others;
"I don't know conversation of momentum but anyway the shape looks off and intrinstictively i am telling it is a bad design."
We are living in an era which everyone knows everything better than anyone aka; trump syndrome.