However, there is also domestic engine work for this.
Few months ago he said that there was no need to develop an engine for Hurjet, and now he says that they are working on it … Hmm

Latest Thread
However, there is also domestic engine work for this.
I think, Navalized Hürjet will most likely be a learning process for Navalized MMU. Perhaps even a carrier-based trainer aircraft may be the real goal for Navalize Hurjet. I think there is definitely an full-size aircraft carrier target now. There are many indications that we are on that path now. Although we do not have a STOVL aircraft and it is difficult to obtain such a platform in the current situation, there is an idea to navalize almost all existing fixed-wing aircraft projects in house. With the current Anadolu, it is unlikely to achieve the sortie capacity for an effective air force, for fixed wings, because of the limitations created by the technical infrastructure/design of the ship, but it can ease the learning curve for the operation of the joint force so that operation of whole task force before we have a real aircraft carrier.
The latest situation in the HÜRJET jet trainer
Ismail Demir;
"There is an export potential. If we had HURJET 5-6 years ago, we would have exported it now. We will also make a model that can take off and land on the TCG ANADOLU Ship. We will also perform the weapon integration."
Looking at all these projects now... after so many years of hard work... the build quality (even of the prototypes), craftsmanship, aesthetics... words can't express the joy, the pride
Bullshit!! Especially when you consider engine and other stuff.
SSB President İsmail Demir:
We have a goal of producing HURJET with 90 percent local.
![]()
Can we not turn this project to a F-16 tier jet? We might need them one day seeing how the US acts in recent years, maybe the F-16 are our last western jets so it wouldnt be too bad if we could build a replacement.Some higher quality images of Hürjet
View attachment 55520
View attachment 55521
View attachment 55522
View attachment 55523
View attachment 55524
View attachment 55525
what other stuff?Bullshit!! Especially when you consider engine and other stuff.
what would be the point when there is the TF-X on its way?Can we not turn this project to a F-16 tier jet? We might need them one day seeing how the US acts in recent years, maybe the F-16 are our last western jets so it wouldnt be too bad if we could build a replacement.
Will you sent a TF-X for jobs like popping a balloon?what would be the point when there is the TF-X on its way?
You do know what "goal" means, right? In case you don't know, here, let me google that for you.Bullshit!! Especially when you consider engine and other stuff.
We'd probably need a stronger engine for that as F-16 has 3 or 4 tones more payload than Hürjet at the moment.Can we not turn this project to a F-16 tier jet?
In a few years, I think that's going to be possible. We have too much in our plate right now, but as we master components and subsystems, an "F-16 lite" can be produced with little problems. If it happens, it's going to be a design issue.Can we not turn this project to a F-16 tier jet? We might need them one day seeing how the US acts in recent years, maybe the F-16 are our last western jets so it wouldnt be too bad if we could build a replacement.
Well, I think this can be solved with a more 'holistic' approach. F-16's require more payload because they need to do everything. Consider Akıncı + F-16 combo and this payload requirement becomes much less of an issue. Then what we built would not be a true multi-role fighter but who cares? It's still going to cost less than an F-16, with dispersed risks and mainatainance. I might be wrong though, I'm not an expert.We'd probably need a stronger engine for that as F-16 has 3 or 4 tones more payload than Hürjet at the moment.