SUNGUR appreciation
Latest Thread
Still a bad handgrip and bad mechanism of targeting system.SUNGUR appreciation
View attachment 57566
That is incorrect, first proper Soviet surface-to-air defense system was the S-75 Dvina which was first unveiled in 1957, beaten by approximately 3 years by the Nike Ajax which was first deployed in 1954. Admittedly the Ajax was ultimately a piece of crap compared to the Dvina but it was still the first.Soviet Russia IS the one who invented surface-to-air defences. They are the ones who perfected it and subsequently used it to tear the US a new one in Vietnam.
Yes, they are currently lagging behind in that field, but that's not because they lack the expertise to make good SAM systems. They're lacking in other stuff.
Would be nice if you shared the relevant study.
I guess orange circle is for effective range but red is for no escape zone. 150km for an AESA GaN X band radar is too short to believe. I think we can easily say that it has 120-150km effective range. They were using same circle arrangement on Hisar A/O.From Last Video
Missile Range : 90 KM
Track & FCS Radar (Possible X Band) : 150 KM
Long Range Search Radar (S Band) : 400 KM
Edit : İt's seen it clearly reach to same level with Samp-t Block 0 . Aster-30 range is already 120 km range but Sampt battery radar arabel range is 100 km so it's generally launch max 100 km from land.
Could be against 1m² or 4m² if I had to guesstimate, as @Anmdt (not sure) pointed out before EİRS should have something around 400km for 1m²I guess orange circle is for effective range but red is for no escape zone. 150km for an AESA GaN X band radar is too short to believe. I think we can easily say that it has 120-150km effective range. They were using same circle arrangement on Hisar A/O.
100% interception is impossible. However, network centric and layered AD concepts have much more chance. I think MKE's 20mm gatling and/or portable Nazar systems will be the standart elements for Siper components. Everything should be done to protect these vital and expensive systems.
I think those Iranian drones might have skewed those results a bit. They are ridiculously easy to intercept, there were even videos/reports of them being down with small arms fire. And Russia used a lot of them.100 targets, 100 hits
Could be against 1m² or 4m² if I had to guesstimate, as @Anmdt (not sure) pointed out before EİRS should have something around 400km for 1m²
I think those Iranian drones might have skewed those results a bit. They are ridiculously easy to intercept, there were even videos/reports of them being down with small arms fire. And Russia used a lot of them.
150km is bad, so bad for such a radar.150km is good enough for X band FCR.
For example, Çafrad's ÇFR which is GaN based AESA has 150km range with capability to track 1000 targets.
Thales's GaN based APAR block ii (which is used as part of dual band suit) is also has similar specifications.
150km against what, in which mode etc etc