Should be MW, also note that F-35 in this image is not going fast (no heating from friction)+ it is using just a portion of its engine power (VTOL mode)Do we know the wavelength of the FLIR camera that took this footage?
Latest Thread
Should be MW, also note that F-35 in this image is not going fast (no heating from friction)+ it is using just a portion of its engine power (VTOL mode)Do we know the wavelength of the FLIR camera that took this footage?
www.veryansintv.com
Technologies planned in the design of KAAN but not available on the F-35:
- Laser Countermeasure System (Aselsan Yıldırım DIRCM)
- Supercruise
(supersonic flying without an afterburner)
- 360° AESA Radar coverage
- IRST Infrared Passive Sensor
(DAS on the F-35 cannot mark).
First of all, do not take that account seriously. He is just trying to get more followers by spreading overly optimistic thoughts.
The part I highlighted in orange confused me, what is this "marking" exactly?
Uh uh oh like CATS is worse on paper (compared to MX-15), TOYGUN is not(actually better on paper compared to EOTS). Also DAS is a continuous zoom system, not a dedicated IRSTFirst of all, do not take that account seriously. He is just trying to get more followers by spreading overly optimistic thoughts.
Also, do not compare what F-35 is as a working platform to what we want from MMU in the 2035s. There is no guarantee that all we wanted will come to life, and F-35 will be much more updated when MMU gets into service.
Also, when one subsystem exists on both platforms does not mean they are equal; remember, ASELSAN makes one while Northrop-Grumman makes the other. We plan separate IRST, but how can we be sure that IRST will be better than F-35's EOTS combined one? Like, when we got CATS, people thought we had an equal camera, but in reality, Mx-15 is still way ahead of CATS. It will be similar when it comes to F-35 subsystems vs. MMU subsystems.
I think it means F35 can't guide laser guided bombs
The part I highlighted in orange confused me, what is this "marking" exactly?
Uh uh oh like CATS is worse on paper (compared to MX-15), TOYGUN is not(actually better on paper compared to EOTS). Also DAS is a continuous zoom system, not a dedicated IRST
I think it means F35 can't guide laser guided bombs
Well we don't know Advanced EOTS (probably better) but yeah he didn't quote Advanced EOTSResolution-wise Toygun is superior to older EOTS.
But new 'Advanced EOTS' seems to have enhanced capabilities and available for block 4 upgrade.
Apparently, according LM it can.
![]()
F-35 Electro Optical Targeting System (EOTS)
Unlock precision air-to-air and air-to-surface capabilities with our stealth technology-enhanced FLIR and IRST infrared sensor combination.www.lockheedmartin.com
Is the bulkhead 3d printedKAAN's titanium bulkheads
Such structural production activities take place at TAI's No.10 building.
View attachment 58298
View attachment 58299
-A single titanium bulkhead weighs around the 100kg mark.
More of TAI's now famous No.10 building
-A400M forward-center fuselage
View attachment 58300
-A320 series section 19 production to the right
View attachment 58301
-A220 forward fuselage canopy section production
View attachment 58302
via TAI & TVNET Savunma Hattı
Is the bulkhead 3d printed
TrMotor APU and Tf35K
View attachment 58334
There's something abnormal about this picture! If the 3 giant side-by-side bays we see here show the exact layout of the internal weapons stations, someone is going to lose sleep. If perspective is not deceiving, and we take the full wingspan as 14m along with a little over 4 meter width of under fuselage witdh: the side IWBs have a width of around 100/110 cm and the main IWB has a width of around 140/160 cm. There are also 2 side weapons bays for fire IIR missiles. In addition to all this, there are several other small bays for countermeasures. But the big news in this photo is the underfuselage stations.
It is important not to confuse access hatches with IWB's.There's something abnormal about this picture! If the 3 giant side-by-side bays we see here show the exact layout of the internal weapons stations, someone is going to lose sleep. If perspective is not deceiving, and we take the full wingspan as 14m along with a little over 4 meter width of under fuselage witdh: the side IWBs have a width of around 100/110 cm and the main IWB has a width of around 140/160 cm. There are also 2 side weapons bays for fire IIR missiles. In addition to all this, there are several other small bays for countermeasures. But the big news in this photo is the underfuselage stations.
A width of 110 centimeters can allow for 3 or maybe even 4 Gökhan placements. In other words, we may be looking at a strike/CAP specialist 5th gen fighter jet, with 3+3, maybe 4+4 BVRAAM under the fuselage and 1+1 short-to-medium range AAM side weapon stations, with a total of 8 air-to-air missiles with weapon stations 1-2-4-5, while can also carry at least 2x2.000lb bombs at main IWB. If this is an optical illusion for me, skip the post. Anyway, I find it interesting that there were no comments on this photo for so long. lol.