TR TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,232
Reactions
138 16,136
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don’t understand this fixation of a plane looking ugly or beautiful.
Who cares how ugly a plane looks?
These are machines to kill.
If it does what it is supposed to do, it doesn’t matter an iota even if it looks beautiful or not.

Besides, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Here is The picture of Russian Queen Katherine I. Peter the great and Merzifonlu Pasha may have thought quite differently of her looks!
1730982748101.jpeg
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
509
Reactions
9 666
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom
I don’t understand this fixation of a plane looking ugly or beautiful.
Who cares how ugly a plane looks?
These are machines to kill.
If it does what it is supposed to do, it doesn’t matter an iota even if it looks beautiful or not.

Besides, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Here is The picture of Russian Queen Katherine I. Peter the great and Merzifonlu Pasha may have thought quite differently of her looks!
View attachment 71896
Can't fault her lipstick!
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,073
Reactions
12,614
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Quote:
advantage of having twin vertical stabilizers is that the location of vertical tails helps in having control authority at high alpha(where the fuselage/wing can blank a single vertical stabilizer). In modern stealth aircraft, having a twin tail enables them to be canted, helping in reducing RCS.
Having twin vertical stabilizers reduces their size, resulting in reduced stress at stabilizer root and reduction in weight.
In case of twin engined aircraft with engines spaced wide apart, having twin rudders helps in getting sufficient rudder authority in case of an engine failure.

Unquote.

They are also there to mask engine exhaust.

So they are not there to please our eyes. But serve a purpose.
Thats not what he meant,he asked a good question,why are they on the engines?
Its about the placing,
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,073
Reactions
12,614
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don’t understand this fixation of a plane looking ugly or beautiful.
Who cares how ugly a plane looks?
These are machines to kill.
If it does what it is supposed to do, it doesn’t matter an iota even if it looks beautiful or not.

Besides, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Here is The picture of Russian Queen Katherine I. Peter the great and Merzifonlu Pasha may have thought quite differently of her looks!
View attachment 71896
I see,you like them big huh??? 😁 😁 😁
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,232
Reactions
138 16,136
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Thats not what he meant,he asked a good question,why are they on the engines?
Its about the placing,
Actually the answer is hidden in my post.
With planes where engines are far apart, the twin rudders give better control over the rudder in case of an engine failure. But there is an optimum place where these rudders are placed and how apart and large they need to be. To optimise RCS and rudder control characteristics , plane is subjected to various wind tunnel tests. I presume our plane’s optimum rudder placement position happened to be on the engine casings.

F 16 has a single rudder and it is right on top of the engine casing.
F18 in below picture has it’s rudders right on top of the engine casing too. (Mind you there is nowhere else to put them on the F18)
1730986953032.jpeg
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,073
Reactions
12,614
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Actually the answer is hidden in my post.
With planes where engines are far apart, the twin rudders give better control over the rudder in case of an engine failure. But there is an optimum place where these rudders are placed and how apart and large they need to be. To optimise RCS and rudder control characteristics , plane is subjected to various wind tunnel tests. I presume our plane’s optimum rudder placement position happened to be on the engine casings.

F 16 has a single rudder and it is right on top of the engine casing.
F18 in below picture has it’s rudders right on top of the engine casing too. (Mind you there is nowhere else to put them on the F18)
View attachment 71897
@Baklava Consumer here is your answer.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
3,886
Reactions
5 4,100
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don’t understand this fixation of a plane looking ugly or beautiful.
Who cares how ugly a plane looks?
These are machines to kill.
If it does what it is supposed to do, it doesn’t matter an iota even if it looks beautiful or not.

Besides, beauty is in the eye of the beholder.
Here is The picture of Russian Queen Katherine I. Peter the great and Merzifonlu Pasha may have thought quite differently of her looks!
View attachment 71896
Have you ever noticed, that „best“ weapons-/systems, are in the same way the most handsomes? From handguns over tanks, to the fighter jets. ‚Form follows Funktion‘.
 

Baklava Consumer

Active member
Messages
72
Reactions
3 196
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Of course, the function is more important, but this jet is more than a fighter jet, it's a propaganda tool and it builds the reputation of the country and its people. Whether you like it or not, it should look like it performs, the exterior does matter. Why do so many people try to tear up the F-35 or F-22? Because it's a glaring example of American power.

Look at the SU-57, they brought it to China, and everyone laughed at them.
SU-57 is a low stealth, low-quality mess, showing how backward Russian workmanship/engineering is and therefore Russia is.
1730998419649.png

1730998237357.png

1730998362161.png
1730998377782.png

1730998562447.png
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom