Latest Thread
If this is a response, it means we are making PKK responsible for the attack in Ankara.I think yes. A mild start that will most probably escalate. In a similar manner MIT UCAVs are working in Kobani, Syria. Artillery units are also working on Tal Rifat, Syria.
It is official.If this is a response, it means we are making PKK responsible for the attack in Ankara.
This is a pretty big score. Finally some good news.3 terrorists were neutralized in result of a failed infiltration attempt.
x.com
x.com
Additionally it is reported that MIT neutralized the PKK's Hakkari so-called leader and one of the commanders in Hakurk, code name "Sefkan Amed", Serkan Nazlier in an operation in Hakurk.
There was also a more advanced Igla-1
I can't wait until MIT gets their hands on some Anka 3s, I know it would be overkill but the idea is just so fucking sweet.MIT's UCAVs targeted a vehicle belonging to PKK terrorists in Sinjar.
In another UCAV strike another vehicle was targeted in Cemanke (Gara). Three terrorists including a leader were killed in the strike.
Well, yes, it would be interesting to watch. But Anka3 is not a frontline attack aircraft. It is presented as a strike drone in strategic depth, and, one must assume, in strategically significant objects.I can't wait until MIT gets their hands on some Anka 3s, I know it would be overkill but the idea is just so fucking sweet.
We need to ask the Economy.Well, yes, it would be interesting to watch. But Anka3 is not a frontline attack aircraft. It is presented as a strike drone in strategic depth, and, one must assume, in strategically significant objects.
You know, since the conversation turned to this, I decided not to hide it any longer and share my dream with the forum members. Here's what I'm thinking about. Will Turkey have, say, Anka4, or 5, a drone (!) of such gigantic dimensions?
View attachment 71964
bro US & A Rule there not kurds , And western use kurds and others as toolSo what is the policy of Turkish government about Syrian Kürdistan?
Are we totally against any foundation of Kurdish autonomy in Syria? If Kurdish autonomy in Syria is a big threat for our national security, Then why did we allow Kurdish autonomy in Iraq?
Or are we against just YPG governed autonomy in Syria? So mild Kurdish autonomy in Syria will be okay?
To be honest, in northern Syria Kurdish population and density are very low, lower than Türkiye.
Look at the so called map, Even mofos don't claim territory from Syria, how come northern Syria became Kurdish territory?
Kürdistan - Vikipedi
tr.m.wikipedia.org
View attachment 71995
View attachment 71996
There are a lot of so called Kürdistan maps, but they took tiny land from Syria.
Sorry for disturbing images but the maps shows there is no Kürdistan in Syria. Unbelievable, currently how those mofos rule the northern?
We should look from the perspective of Kurdish politics in Iraq and Syria based on mutual interest, realities and Turkiye's relationship with the big Kurdish powers.So what is the policy of Turkish government about Syrian Kürdistan?
Are we totally against any foundation of Kurdish autonomy in Syria? If Kurdish autonomy in Syria is a big threat for our national security, Then why did we allow Kurdish autonomy in Iraq?
Or are we against just YPG governed autonomy in Syria? So mild Kurdish autonomy in Syria will be okay?
To be honest, in northern Syria Kurdish population and density are very low, lower than Türkiye.
View attachment 71998
Look at the so called map, Even mofos don't claim territory from Syria, how come northern Syria became Kurdish territory?
Kürdistan - Vikipedi
tr.m.wikipedia.org
View attachment 71995
View attachment 71996
There are a lot of so called Kürdistan maps, but they took tiny land from Syria.
Sorry for disturbing images but the maps shows there is no Kürdistan in Syria. Unbelievable, currently how those mofos rule the northern?
View attachment 71997