TR Military Operations in Northern Iraq

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
3,902
Reactions
5 4,104
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I think yes. A mild start that will most probably escalate. In a similar manner MIT UCAVs are working in Kobani, Syria. Artillery units are also working on Tal Rifat, Syria.
If this is a response, it means we are making PKK responsible for the attack in Ankara.
 

Huelague

Experienced member
Messages
3,902
Reactions
5 4,104
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Now, can we expect the we are going to take Ayn al Arab, Hassekeh, Tel Rifat etc…
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,206
Reactions
106 19,320
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
3 terrorists were neutralized in result of a failed infiltration attempt.


Additionally it is reported that MIT neutralized the PKK's Hakkari so-called leader and one of the commanders in Hakurk, code name "Sefkan Amed", Serkan Nazlier in an operation in Hakurk.

There was also a more advanced Igla-1
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
2,315
Reactions
79 10,545
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

boredaf

Contributor
Messages
1,388
Solutions
1
Reactions
16 3,836
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
454
Reactions
9 1,268
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
I can't wait until MIT gets their hands on some Anka 3s, I know it would be overkill but the idea is just so fucking sweet.
Well, yes, it would be interesting to watch. But Anka3 is not a frontline attack aircraft. It is presented as a strike drone in strategic depth, and, one must assume, in strategically significant objects.
You know, since the conversation turned to this, I decided not to hide it any longer and share my dream with the forum members. Here's what I'm thinking about. Will Turkey have, say, Anka4, or 5, a drone (!) of such gigantic dimensions?

B - 2 Spirit
1731304261103.png


??? ;)
1731339588137.png
 
Last edited:

Strong AI

Contributor
Messages
1,014
Reactions
35 4,054
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Well, yes, it would be interesting to watch. But Anka3 is not a frontline attack aircraft. It is presented as a strike drone in strategic depth, and, one must assume, in strategically significant objects.
You know, since the conversation turned to this, I decided not to hide it any longer and share my dream with the forum members. Here's what I'm thinking about. Will Turkey have, say, Anka4, or 5, a drone (!) of such gigantic dimensions?

View attachment 71964
We need to ask the Economy.
 

UkroTurk

Experienced member
Land Warfare Specialist
Professional
Messages
2,663
Reactions
54 4,748
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
So what is the policy of Turkish government about Syrian Kürdistan?

Are we totally against any foundation of Kurdish autonomy in Syria? If Kurdish autonomy in Syria is a big threat for our national security, Then why did we allow Kurdish autonomy in Iraq?

Or are we against just YPG governed autonomy in Syria? So mild Kurdish autonomy in Syria will be okay?

To be honest, in northern Syria Kurdish population and density are very low, lower than Türkiye.


1731450489714.jpeg



Look at the so called map, Even mofos don't claim territory from Syria, how come northern Syria became Kurdish territory?


1731448669180.jpeg


1731448900584.jpeg

There are a lot of so called Kürdistan maps, but they took tiny land from Syria.

Sorry for disturbing images but the maps shows there is no Kürdistan in Syria. Unbelievable, currently how those mofos rule the northern?
1731450326903.jpeg
 
Last edited:

BalkanTurk90

Contributor
Messages
655
Reactions
5 1,025
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
So what is the policy of Turkish government about Syrian Kürdistan?

Are we totally against any foundation of Kurdish autonomy in Syria? If Kurdish autonomy in Syria is a big threat for our national security, Then why did we allow Kurdish autonomy in Iraq?

Or are we against just YPG governed autonomy in Syria? So mild Kurdish autonomy in Syria will be okay?

To be honest, in northern Syria Kurdish population and density are very low, lower than Türkiye.


Look at the so called map, Even mofos don't claim territory from Syria, how come northern Syria became Kurdish territory?


View attachment 71995

View attachment 71996
There are a lot of so called Kürdistan maps, but they took tiny land from Syria.

Sorry for disturbing images but the maps shows there is no Kürdistan in Syria. Unbelievable, currently how those mofos rule the northern?
bro US & A Rule there not kurds , And western use kurds and others as tool
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,206
Reactions
106 19,320
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
So what is the policy of Turkish government about Syrian Kürdistan?

Are we totally against any foundation of Kurdish autonomy in Syria? If Kurdish autonomy in Syria is a big threat for our national security, Then why did we allow Kurdish autonomy in Iraq?

Or are we against just YPG governed autonomy in Syria? So mild Kurdish autonomy in Syria will be okay?

To be honest, in northern Syria Kurdish population and density are very low, lower than Türkiye.


View attachment 71998


Look at the so called map, Even mofos don't claim territory from Syria, how come northern Syria became Kurdish territory?


View attachment 71995

View attachment 71996
There are a lot of so called Kürdistan maps, but they took tiny land from Syria.

Sorry for disturbing images but the maps shows there is no Kürdistan in Syria. Unbelievable, currently how those mofos rule the northern?
View attachment 71997
We should look from the perspective of Kurdish politics in Iraq and Syria based on mutual interest, realities and Turkiye's relationship with the big Kurdish powers.

There are basically two camps

Iraq Talabani---PYD/YPG Syria

Iraq Barzani---ENKS Syria

The first couple is heavily anti-Turkish. Bafel Talabani just like his father manages to play with all sides according to his plans, but he is too dumb to cross Turkiye's red lines.

The second couple is currently heavily pro-Turkiye, not because they love us, but because they realized after the failed independence referendum how heavily they depend on us and that they don't have any future without Turkiye. Basically we got them by the balls.

Talabani cooperates with all branches of the PKK both in Iraq and Syria while Barzani refuses cooperation and works in a tight coordination with Turkiye in order to support Turkiye's counter-terrorism efforts.

When we take in account these dynamics the next thing we should look is to see who is representing the Turkish supported Syrian Opposition that is supposed to negotiate with Assad on a constitution, actively play role in a possible election process and possibly rule the country. A part of the Syrian Opposition representation is the ENKS.

So when it comes to the Kurdish affairs in Iraq and Syria we support the Barzani-ENKS duo.

I personally don't think that we would support a Kurdish autonomy in Syria no matter with the ENKS or PYD on the lead. The protection of Syria's integrity is the main point according to which we shape our politics there. We support the greatest Kurdish power in the region (KDP) and they enable our policies within the Kurds, increasing our influence and this cooperation is based on mutual interests and the best thing is that they don't have any other choice.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom