TR Altay Main Battle Tank & Related Programs

[TheInsider]

Now proof your claim and don't come with videos from Ukraine.

• Altay will not operate alone
• We have several Soft-Kill and Hard-Kill systems against FPV drones

Tanks never operated alone even in WW2 tanks were accompanied by AA systems. Drones are a serious threat that can not be countered with only soft kill and hard kill systems. Soft kill systems can be bypassed by better electronics or fiber optic cables, hard kill systems can be saturated and their protection area is quite limited. Drones should be countered collectively similar to crowdfunding a project. Tanks shouldn't outsource their protection against drones depending on some nearby anti-drone systems. Every tank should have its own layered robust anti-drone warfare capability on top of independent anti-drone and airdefense systems that accompany them.

 

[Sanchez]

Why is it so expensive?

We created it out of nothing, and at the time used best stuff available on it. We didn't just make a tank, we built the ecosystem to build a tank as well.

Big delays are catastrophic.

Agreed, but Altay was expensive before all the delays as well. Otokar's bid for 250 tanks was what, 14 million apiece? Otokar also took all the stuff I mentioned above into consideration when bidding. BMC undercut them heavily, and now their costs are similar, with a 10 year delay to boot. And how do we even measure the cost of tanks and tankers we lost, and the tactical delays those losses created in theater over the years?

 

[TR_123456]

This may sound far fetched. But the change is coming. We are at the precipice of the change. And we need to act quickly. We must take measures that the transformation of battlefield tactics are implemented by us first in a controlled manner without losing ground, like the aerial drone warfare we brought in to the battlefield tactics.

Arent we doing that already?
We developed drones but also countermeasures,we changed our doctrine accordingly,no?

 

[Yasar_TR]

Arent we doing that already?
We developed drones but also countermeasures,we changed our doctrine accordingly,no?

We have changed the doctrine in a limited fashion as far as what is out there in the open. Yes, with UAVs and UCAVs and our work on unmanned sea vehicles and submarines that are going on, we are ahead of many countries. Especially in air drone warfare.
But we need to keep this momentum going in other areas as well.

Regarding tanks and armoured vehicles; We are still trying to produce 250 Altay tanks. These are going to be furnished with predominantly old school systems. First batch definitely going to be no different to original, in terms of crew and turret.
Ukraine war has shown that we can’t be complacent. Even the first batch of tanks will have to be built, with a view to what we want the tanks to evolve in to. Same has to be done for ACVs.
At the interim, we need to furnish our armoured vehicles with extensive active protection systems. Start changing the way these vehicles are used with respective protection and weaponry.
Unmanned systems rely heavily on uninterrupted communications and EW. We need to develop long distance communication systems to keep unmanned vehicles under our control, free from jamming and interference. In air warfare, we need to develop special long range relay stations to extend our LOS usage capability. Countries like USA and China have low orbit satellites for latency free communications. They are having to develop protection systems for these. We need to develop our own systems that are more in line with what we can do and afford. Seljuk Bayraktar already tapped in to this subject in his recent interviews.

 

[Ripley]

Arent we doing that already?
We developed drones but also countermeasures,we changed our doctrine accordingly,no?

Yes we are.
As a matter of fact, Turkey literally showcased what modern multi dimensional warfare doctrine can do at Karabagh. However, it was dissed by hesitant, Turkish haters as “poor man’s war”.
I think what @Yasar_TR abi means is that, we just can’t call it a day, and say we’re good now let’s wait our opponents counter act our doctrine because tactical shift paradigms developing so fast that you need to constantly develop and adapt your doctrinal approach accordingly.

 

[Saithan]

Anything wrong with having 4th gen tank even if only 250 of them before creating 5th gen tank thanks to the whole new doct ine of uav, ucav, loitering ammo etc ?

 

[Yasar_TR]

Anything wrong with having 4th gen tank even if only 250 of them before creating 5th gen tank thanks to the whole new doct ine of uav, ucav, loitering ammo etc ?

Good question!
I will try to answer with another question.
Would you like to be the person to explain to the fallen heroes’ family that for the sake of few months or a year that we couldn’t wait because the political system wanted to prove a point. Hence a better more capable version already in the drawing board couldn’t be applied.

We know that Altay with crew less turret and better protection is already being worked on. why not program production of a more recent version? Heck! We waited nearly a decade for this tank. What is another year?

 

[Strong AI]

I think many members overestimate tanks in general and expect too much from them. They were always counterable by mere infantry, dating back to WW1.
And how do you want to get a lighter tank but in the same time counter any threat?

We know that Altay with crew less turret and better protection is already being worked on.

And do we know if this actually works on the field? For example is there any success from Armata on the field? Is there any other similiar tank in serial production?

 

[Ripley]

I think many members overestimate tanks in general and expect too much from them. They were always counterable by mere infantry, dating back to WW1.
And how do you want to get a lighter tank but in the same time counter any threat?

And do we know if this actually works on the field? For example is there any success from Armata on the field? Is there any other similiar tank in serial production?

I think you good point there when you say overestimate ‘cause let’s face it, there are tank haters as much as worshippers .

Your second point though, I’m also not sure about it but Western countries already working on unmanned turret tank designs and envision fully autonomous units. We also heard that Altay’s third batch planned to be with unmanned turrets.
Despite my hesitation, I also feel that we shouldn’t stay behind as our last tank is late already in every way .

 

[uçuyorum]

Good question!
I will try to answer with another question.
Would you like to be the person to explain to the fallen heroes’ family that for the sake of few months or a year that we couldn’t wait because the political system wanted to prove a point. Hence a better more capable version already in the drawing board couldn’t be applied.

We know that Altay with crew less turret and better protection is already being worked on. why not program production of a more recent version? Heck! We waited nearly a decade for this tank. What is another year?

Well there is the possibility of doing the same for M60, M48 and unmodernized Leo

 

[Huelague]

Any kind of weapon systems can be destroyed. Its not an excuse to do not produce them.