Why not against both?Torpedo with 100km rangecool.
On the other hand sonars can't detect submarines over 50km. So could we say it is anti-ship torpedo?
Latest Thread
Why not against both?Torpedo with 100km rangecool.
On the other hand sonars can't detect submarines over 50km. So could we say it is anti-ship torpedo?
Nah we don't. There is only HWT project so far and it is Akya - TN also participates in this project. MSB is trying to steal some scene - and fund some people here.So we also have 2 heavyweight torpedo programs as well.(after two ramjet long range missile program)
I don't know what to say other than " ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ "
You can't easily track and identify surface or underwater threats beyond a range (not dropping it here). Take this 100 km (even though the project has no concrete foundation) as part of reattempt - wake trailing and so on kind of a 'total distance traveled'. Thus not the interception range, shall i iterate again that this project, more or less, is a joke to entire defence industry?Why not against both?
MSB R&D is ,more or less, a joke. Nothing further (insert a big period here).