Latest Thread
It is not Super Şimşek's primary function but it can act as Kamikaze if needed. It has an integrated 35 kg warhead option for kamikaze missions. Here is except from Roketsan's siteAre you sure süper simsek is a kamikaze drone?
Isn't more of a loitering support platform to help manned and unmanned jets in combat with ISR and ew payloads.
They've been considering that for more than a year now. Still waiting for an order.Colombia considering replacing Israeli Hermes UAVs with Turkish Baykar drones: Report
Excellent news!![]()
ASELSAN to Integrate MURAD 100-A Radar on ANKA-III UCAV | TURDEF
ASELSAN stated that MURAD 100-A AESA radar will be integrated on TUSAŞ’s ANKA-III stealth UCAV following F-16, AKINCI UCAV, and KIZILELMA unmanned fighter.turdef.com
Murad 100-A will be integrated in to Anka-3.
This is good news. Anka-3 with an Aesa radar will be deadlier than ever. It will be able to strike targets really deep in to enemy territory.
Come on TEI ! It is high time to get that TF6000 engine ready now !
View attachment 78952
Where, exactly? Not only it doesn't have the nose for it but engine intake starts right above it. They'd be far better off finding a LO solution for Fulmar 200 pod (or integrate something similar within the body) instead of trying to fit Murad in Anka-3. Trying to fit subsonic Anka-3 into A2A role is ridiculous, just focus on it as an A2G platform and let it excel in what it does. Not every platform should or even can be a jack of all trades.![]()
ASELSAN to Integrate MURAD 100-A Radar on ANKA-III UCAV | TURDEF
ASELSAN stated that MURAD 100-A AESA radar will be integrated on TUSAŞ’s ANKA-III stealth UCAV following F-16, AKINCI UCAV, and KIZILELMA unmanned fighter.turdef.com
Murad 100-A will be integrated in to Anka-3.
This is good news. Anka-3 with an Aesa radar will be deadlier than ever. It will be able to strike targets really deep in to enemy territory.
Come on TEI ! It is high time to get that TF6000 engine ready now !
View attachment 78952
I'm pretty sure AESA radars can be adapted into different shapes. So the T/R modules can be spread in a flatter shape across the nose instead of the traditional circular or square designs.Where, exactly? Not only it doesn't have the nose for it but engine intake starts right above it. They'd be far better off finding a LO solution for Fulmar 200 pod (or integrate something similar within the body) instead of trying to fit Murad in Anka-3. Trying to fit subsonic Anka-3 into A2A role is ridiculous, just focus on it as an A2G platform and let it excel in what it does. Not every platform should or even can be a jack of all trades.
I'm guessing that would require whole new set of tests on the ground and in air. As I said, I really fail to see the logic in spending time and resources on that, especially if the idea is to use it for a2a engagements.I'm pretty sure AESA radars can be adapted into different shapes. So the T/R modules can be spread in a flatter shape across the nose instead of the traditional circular or square designs.
I don't think it's necessarily a bad idea. Anka 3 due to its tailless design will be the stealthiest of our 3 current stealth platforms.I'm guessing that would require whole new set of tests on the ground and in air. As I said, I really fail to see the logic in spending time and resources on that, especially if the idea is to use it for a2a engagements.
I'm curious where on the Anka-3 they're going to integrate the Murad 100a AESA radar without changing the antenna's shape.
If you look at the below picture and the 3D model, there is a sizeable radome there to fit some form of a radar in.Where, exactly? Not only it doesn't have the nose for it but engine intake starts right above it. They'd be far better off finding a LO solution for Fulmar 200 pod (or integrate something similar within the body) instead of trying to fit Murad in Anka-3. Trying to fit subsonic Anka-3 into A2A role is ridiculous, just focus on it as an A2G platform and let it excel in what it does. Not every platform should or even can be a jack of all trades.
Not to engage a2a, B-2 has never done it and even for B-21 they were just studying the option and nothing more. And this wouldn't be the first time TAI officials talked out of their arses mate, they were going to deliver a dozen Hürkuş last year, as well as T929, remember? They keep trying to push Hürjet as a viable naval platform to be used in bloody 2030s-40s. Just because they want to or plan to do it, it doesn't mean it makes sense.B21 and B2, both have Aesa radars. I wonder why???