TR UAV/UCAV Programs | Anka - series | Kızılelma | TB - series

[Quasar]

''drone>sat>controls>human>control>sat>drone''

I guess we should not just focus on signal delays but also the fact that KIZILELMA is a fast and maneuvering object. Therefore, not just delay but satcom signal interruptions is almost inevitable.... i.e there can/will be possibly delayed intervals of communication not a constant one.

Human role is confined to pre authorizations and updating mission parameters not a constant control... Rest will be/ should be done by KIZILELMA autonomously.

in the case of manned unmanned teaming it may potenially require more data exchange

 

[Anmdt]

''drone>sat>controls>human>control>sat>drone''

I guess we should not just focus on signal delays but also the fact that KIZILELMA is a fast and maneuvering object. Therefore, not just delay but satcom signal interruptions is almost inevitable.... i.e there can/will be possibly delayed intervals of communication not a constant one.

Human role is confined to pre authorizations and updating mission parameters not a constant control... Rest will be/ should be done by KIZILELMA autonomously.

in the case of manned unmanned teaming it may potenially require more data exchange

We should also keep in mind that information doesn't just bounce off the relay points. So it is;
drone - data processing - encryption - sat - data processing - ground - decryption - data processing & visualization - operator - interface and ditto to drone.
This is as whole more than 'just few seconds' of delay. Not a big deal for BVR missions with mission data sets, imo.

 

[uçuyorum]

We should also keep in mind that information doesn't just bounce off the relay points. So it is;
drone - data processing - encryption - sat - data processing - ground - decryption - data processing & visualization - operator - interface and ditto to drone.
This is as whole more than 'just few seconds' of delay. Not a big deal for BVR missions with mission data sets, imo.

Line of sight should be more feasible

 

[Quasar]

Line of sight should be more feasible

in the case of manned unmanned teaming as you stated data links operates within the line-of-sight....therefore, in fact there is no fixed value for the range of data link.... Altitude, Terrain and Atmosphere are also effecting factors.

More importantly, if KIZILELMA and ANKA 3.... KAAN are low observable and we want to focus on it our data link should evolve accordingly as well i.e as a part of low observablty concept we may need to use low probability of intercept (LPI) datalinks eventually