TR Air-Force TF-X KAAN Fighter Jet

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,723
Reactions
115 16,993
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Explain why it is good?
I had and still do have my reservations on Kaan's IWB space. Too big of a jet, but until yesterday it probably couldn't carry 4 long range AAMs. Goal should be 6; but unsure if that's planned.

1771099741377.png
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
1,990
Solutions
1
Reactions
39 5,884
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I had and still do have my reservations on Kaan's IWB space. Too big of a jet, but until yesterday it probably couldn't carry 4 long range AAMs. Goal should be 6; but unsure if that's planned.

View attachment 79346
Would 6 even fit though? It's not just the missiles, its whatever rack or pylon or hardpoints we put inside, at some distance between the missiles themselves, then between the missiles and the walls of the weapon bay all around it. We also need space for engine inlets to pass somewhere around there as well to reach the engine, don't we?
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,723
Reactions
115 16,993
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Would 6 even fit though? It's not just the missiles, its whatever rack or pylon or hardpoints we put inside, at some distance between the missiles themselves, then between the missiles and the walls of the weapon bay all around it. We also need space for engine inlets to pass somewhere around there as well to reach the engine, don't we?
All true, and it's not done by anyone else so far; but would be a huge boon. Kaan is big and has lots of fuel to go all the way to Libya and do CAP there. 6 long sticks will be needed for future.
 

Burberryswine1

New member
Messages
2
Reactions
5
Nation of residence
United States of America
Nation of origin
Turkey
Would 6 even fit though? It's not just the missiles, its whatever rack or pylon or hardpoints we put inside, at some distance between the missiles themselves, then between the missiles and the walls of the weapon bay all around it. We also need space for engine inlets to pass somewhere around there as well to reach the engine, don't we?
they could try something similar to the F35 with its internal weapons bay doors
1771102857192.png
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,905
Reactions
235 20,296
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Are you serious?
Our startups doing small stuff, not developing a hypersonic missile.
Guys, before discussing/arguing about hypersonic missiles, you need to clarify what you mean by “hypersonic” missiles.

Most ballistic missiles achieve hypersonic speeds during their midcourse flights. Are they hypersonic missiles?
Take Bora missile; during midcourse it reaches hypersonic speeds. But it hits its target just above 1 Mach.
Typhoon block 1 is not much different either. It stays at hypersonic speeds longer at higher values. But it slows down to supersonic speeds during its terminal phase.
Typhoon block 4, as per Roketsan‘s claim, will hit it’s target at hypersonic speeds. That means it will have propulsion during terminal phase. That will make it a truer hypersonic missile than the above ones.

Then of course there is the scramjet powered hypersonic missiles. These will travel at altitudes between 20km to 35km. But will have nonstop propulsion until they hit their targets.

Which is the one that is hypersonic?
 
Messages
18
Reactions
1 38
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Honestly, I don't think the US will ever provide F110 engines for serial production. It looks like we have no choice but to wait for the TF35000 engine to be ready around 2032–33.

If the US is against Saudi Arabia acquiring the KAAN, they definitely won't give us the engines. We'll have no option but to wait for the TF35000. Unlike the Altay, there isn't even an alternative engine for this project. And anyway, an 'alternative engine' would mean significant design changes.
 

Zafer

Experienced member
Messages
5,241
Reactions
14 8,105
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
If foreign engine not arrive by mid 2028 then replace foreign engine with local engine by mid 2029, end wait.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,905
Reactions
235 20,296
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Saudi Arabia could completely back out. The US saying “Let's give you the F-35s, don't buy the Kaan” is enough for them
Saudis are interested in Tempest and Kaan, not because they just need to purchase these planes. They want to learn how they are made. MBS the Crown Prince wants a sizeable indigenous content in the planes they are going to buy to kick start their aerospace industry. Of the two we are the only ones that can help them. But we insist on a minimum 50 plane order to justify us setting up a production line for them in Saudi land.

Honestly, I don't think the US will ever provide F110 engines for serial production. It looks like we have no choice but to wait for the TF35000 engine to be ready around 2032–33.
US would have two reasons not to give us the 110 engines.
1. Kaan is part of the SSB program, and SSB is sanctioned by CAATSA.
2. If they don’t want us to be stepping in, to steal their customers. For that they don’t need to stop delivery of F110s. They just block the sale of engines on specific country basis; like they did with Pakistani Atak129 order.

US knows very well that we will make our own engine in the end. So stopping deliveries of F110 engines is short term solution. Yet if they supply these engines they will be selling minimum 90, more likely 130 engines to us. That is a lot of engine business to lose.
 
Messages
18
Reactions
1 38
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Saudis are interested in Tempest and Kaan, not because they just need to purchase these planes. They want to learn how they are made. MBS the Crown Prince wants a sizeable indigenous content in the planes they are going to buy to kick start their aerospace industry. Of the two we are the only ones that can help them. But we insist on a minimum 50 plane order to justify us setting up a production line for them in Saudi land.


US would have two reasons not to give us the 110 engines.
1. Kaan is part of the SSB program, and SSB is sanctioned by CAATSA.
2. If they don’t want us to be stepping in, to steal their customers. For that they don’t need to stop delivery of F110s. They just block the sale of engines on specific country basis; like they did with Pakistani Atak129 order.

US knows very well that we will make our own engine in the end. So stopping deliveries of F110 engines is short term solution. Yet if they supply these engines they will be selling minimum 90, more likely 130 engines to us. That is a lot of engine business to lose.
The only hope is that, thanks to the quite good relationship between President Erdoğan and Trump, the CAATSA sanctions will be lifted during this period and the F110 engines will be supplied quickly. We can also expect the F-16 and F-35 issues to be resolved. As you said, sooner or later we will develop the TF35000 anyway and we won’t need the US anymore. By not giving the engines, they will lose both money and a customer. But in 6-7 years, they will completely lose that customer anyway. Delivering the F110s quickly would also be in their own interest.
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
6,098
Reactions
15,514
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Saudi Arabia could completely back out. The US saying “Let's give you the F-35s, don't buy the Kaan” is enough for them
No it wouldnt,it is deeper then the F-35.
There is no more trust in the US,not just for defence platforms.
 
Top Bottom