No one reported this news apart from Ajai Shukla
Yeah thats why I put an "if"....but the guy does pan out correctly on some issues later.
No one reported this news apart from Ajai Shukla
There were also some reports that IA was requesting for waivers and exceptions of certain tech in the import ban list and this news came right after the list was released quoting unknown sources. None of the weapons systems in the list are of critical nature and something where DRDO or some private firms like Tata, Kalyani etc have made significant progress inYeah thats why I put an "if"....but the guy does pan out correctly on some issues later.
Ajai Shukla .... he is real hamam member , so take his words with pinch of saltYeah thats why I put an "if"....but the guy does pan out correctly on some issues later.
The reason is behind this article is :TIFWIW, he's back again:
Elbit offers to build 70% of 155 mm artillery gun in India; at about half the cost of the indigenous ATAGS
By Ajai Shukla
Business Standard, 9 December 20
After quoting far cheaper than French gunmaker Nexter in a government tender to supply the Indian Army with 1,580 artillery guns, Israeli firm Elbit Systems has written to Defence Minister Rajnath Singh, sweetening its offer by promising to build 70 per cent of the weapon in India.
That is significantly higher indigenisation than the 50 per cent required for “Make in India” projects.
The Ministry of Defence (MoD) tender requires Elbit Systems to supply the first 400 of its ATHOS 155 mm, 52-calibre towed artillery guns in fully built or knocked-down condition, with no indigenisation requirements. The remaining 1,180 guns, which the Ordnance Factory Board (OFB) has to manufacture with transfer of technology (ToT) from Elbit, must be at least 50 per cent made in India.
Elbit’s letter, which Business Standard has reviewed, far exceeds that requirement. “We would like to confirm that Elbit Systems is committed to manufacture the ATHOS towed gun system in India, strictly and in full compliance of the ‘Make in India’ policy, with 70 per cent indigenisation (Indian value) within the contract of the first 400 towed guns,” it says.
For indigenising the first 400 ATHOS guns, Elbit has partnered the Pune-based Kalyani Group and its flagship, Bharat Forge. Once production of the Indian Army’s next 1,180 guns shifts to the OFB, Elbit and the Kalyani Group intend to continue building ATHOS guns together for the global market.
“We will take the required actions to brand the ATHOS as an Indian towed gun system, fully manufactured in India. Elbit is also committed to use its Global Supply Chains for export of the fully indigenous ATHOS gun, produced, assembled and tested in India to other countries around the globe,” states the letter, signed by Elbit’s vice-president, Yehuda Vered.
In addition to full ToT to enable OFB to build 1,180 guns, Elbit writes it has taken “very decisive, firm and committed steps” to partner Indian companies to indigenise the first 400 guns. These include establishing a joint venture (JV) with Bharat Forge called BF Elbit Advanced Systems Private Ltd; and a JV with Alpha Design Technologies called Alpha ELSEC Private Ltd. “Elbit Systems is also in the process of concluding a JV with Aditya Precitech Private Ltd, Hyderabad,” writes Elbit.
In its response to the MoD’s tender, Elbit System’s ATHOS gun turned out to be priced a whopping 40 per cent cheaper than the Nexter gun. Elbit quoted €477 million for 400 guns, compared to €776 million quoted by Nexter, say sources privy to the tender process.
That means each ATHOS gun is priced at €1.2 million (~10.7 crore per piece), while Nexter’s would cost €1.94 million or ~17.3 crore per piece.
At that price, the ATHOS is barely half the cost of the indigenously designed, developed and manufactured Advanced Towed Artillery Gun System (ATAGS), which is estimated to be priced at close to ~20 crore per piece.
Perhaps for this reason, the MoD has kept the door open for importing the ATHOS, while the Defence R&D Organisation (DRDO) continues with trials of the ATAGS, which it is developing in public-private partnership with Bharat Forge and the Tata Group.
Business Standard had reported (November 30, Artillery import embargo put off, doors open for ~23,700 cr Israeli guns) that the MoD — which had earlier embargoed the import of all 155 mm, 52-calibre towed artillery guns from December 31, 2020 — reversed course on August 21 and permitted imports for another year, that is till December 31, 2021.
Buying 155 mm artillery for the army has proved extremely difficult since the controversial Bofors FH77B procurement in the late 1980s. Since these heavy guns proved to be a battle-winning weapon in the 1999 Kargil War, successive governments have tried in vain to conclude a contract for buying more. However, the reverberations of the Bofors scandal ensured that successive procurement attempts came to nought.
A breakthrough came only in March 2019, after three years of exhaustive trials, when Elbit’s ATHOS gun was declared the “preferred supplier/vendor” — the MoD’s terminology for the lowest qualified bidder (L-1).
However, a contract is still to be concluded. MoD sources say there is concern within the defence establishment that the low cost of the ATHOS might render the procurement of the indigenous ATAGS problematic later. Both of them are 155 mm, 52-calibre towed artillery guns but ATHOS’ cost is far lower.
There are also lower calibre guns under procurement, including the 155 mm, 39-calibre ultralight howitzer, of which 145 pieces are being procured from BAE Systems Inc. Besides that, the OFB is building 140 pieces of the Dhanush 155 mm, 45-calibre gun, which it has developed from the blueprints of the Bofors FH77B howitzer.
The reason is behind this article is :
Can you describe qualities of ATAGS w.r.t ATHOS?Yah I follow the banter at BR after he posts something lol.
Can you describe qualities of ATAGS w.r.t ATHOS?
Also if we're going with ATAGS is it okay to compromise price?
Pic of the day ... hope we will see Indian weapons ( from private industry ) get inducted in numbersKalyani 155mm/39.
View attachment 9964
@Nilgiri Venkatpathi Raju Pace?
It's just that I might be impatient, but lets spare a thought to a few things.Arjuna Ranatunga style...why run when you can stroll?
It's just that I might be impatient, but lets spare a thought to a few things.
OFB does not manufacture 122mm ammunition for years now, i.e all d30's and 2S1 Gzovidka have been decommissioned.
Almost half of FH44 Haubits have been cannibilized.
M46 modernization to 155mm has been bouncing from excalibur to metamorphises to Punjj Lyod to OFb to Soltam and then back to OFB sharang for an astounding 12 years.
Peacemeal 100 K9 Vajra's, M177's and Dhanush are just a drop in the bucket. The army that boasts of 3:1 superiority with it's western neighbor as it stands is heavily outgunned as of today.
not sure about the highlighted part above.1990 - 2010 were pretty much 2 complete lost decades on some basic things (in MIC) we should have squared away fairly easily....given we had such things like the bofors to use as any reliable starting basis.
So yes because of catchup pressure now, actual industrial options available now.... (and babu's being same ole same ole) there is lot of lilypad hopping. But at least this last decade and coming decade are going to be better than the last 2 on this as far as sorting out goes. We'll see if we are truly in the bus (we caught late) or just hanging off the door a bit later though.