TR Altay Main Battle Tank & Related Programs

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,247
Reactions
141 16,269
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
In theory yes,
How about when you need to fit it into a tank? Which would fit easier?
A hydraulic which needs a pump and hydraulic reserve + drivers or a simple electrical engine to drive the turret?
No brainier ! Electric!
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,501
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,879
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Quite:
Yaklaşık 700 milyon Euro'ya TCK'nın Leopar tankları yenilenecek.

Cumhurbaşkanlığı Savunma Sanayii Başkanlığı (SSB) tarafından açılan ihale kapsamında 81 + 250 (Opsiyon) Leopard 2A4 tankı modernize edilecek.
Unquote.


According to Sozcu newspaper, 81+250 Leopard 2a4 tanks will be modernised for a price of 700million Euros. That makes 2.11 million Euro per tank.
That is cheap! When finished we will have a tank as good as Leo2a6+
Era armour, new tarret and front add on armour, ballistic protection cage for the back, Pulat active protection System, Laser warning system, SARP remote control gun, short distance surveillance system, driver view finder, audio warning system etc etc. Aselsan, Roketsan and BMC will be cooperating in the modernisation.
250 is the option,
It is very lesslikely to include options in the price so the given contract value is for 81 units.
Which means ~$9 million per vehicle could be sign of installing the Altay turret as shown by BMC
 
Last edited:

500

Contributor
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
Israel Moderator
Messages
808
Solutions
1
Reactions
11 2,974
Nation of residence
Israel
Nation of origin
Israel
I’m wishing electric suspension as with the Merkava 4. @500 Do you have comment on this?
First turret drives were actually electric. But they were slow. Then hydraulic turret drives appeared which were much faster but very flammable (Sherman, Patton). Modern hydraulics are much less flammable but still better to have pure electric (which are now fast enough).
 

Hexciter

Experienced member
Messages
2,575
Reactions
4 11,451
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
First turret drives were actually electric. But they were slow. Then hydraulic turret drives appeared which were much faster but very flammable (Sherman, Patton). Modern hydraulics are much less flammable but still better to have pure electric (which are now fast enough).
Thks
Do Merkava’s have electric suspension also?
 

CAN_TR

Contributor
Messages
1,474
Reactions
17 5,211
Nation of residence
Austria
Nation of origin
Turkey
WOW $700 million for 81 Tanks, i feel so sorry for ROKETSAN and the engineers, coming with such a good solution but "losing" to the most hilarious option.

1615481080707.png
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,247
Reactions
141 16,269
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
250 is the option,
It is very lesslikely to include options in the price so the given contract value is for 81 units.
Which means ~$9 million per vehicle could be sign of installing the Altay turret as shown by BMC
If this is the case then it is outrageously expensive! Even with an Altay turret!
 
T

Turko

Guest
We could produce 81 medium weight new tanks with the latest technology and could upgrade Leo's with roketsans ERA.
What's wrong with Leo's current turret which is neat and tide? Why especially do they need ALTAY turret?


Are there sanctions on Caterpillar engines of KAPLAN MMWT? Why don't they go for MMWT until they are able to produce tank engine?

Crazy questions roaming in my head:)
 

Hexciter

Experienced member
Messages
2,575
Reactions
4 11,451
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
We could produce 81 medium weight new tanks with the latest technology and could upgrade Leo's with roketsans ERA.
What's wrong with Leo's current turret which is neat and tide? Why especially do they need ALTAY turret?


Are there sanctions on Caterpillar engines of KAPLAN MMWT? Why don't they go for MMWT until they are able to produce tank engine?

Crazy questions roaming in my head:)
I know the situation as like that:
Versions of Leopard 2 up to A4 have fixed armour which is very difficult to upgrade. Because of that Germans kept A5 versions but sold the previous versions as second hand. They’re upgrading A5’s to A6 and A7. The only A5 or newer variants outside are directly bought as first hand (i.e. Greece, Spain etc.).
I think this will clear the why of installing a new turret can be cheaper that modifiying the previous.
 
T

Turko

Guest
I know the situation as like that:
Versions of Leopard 2 up to A4 have fixed armour which is very difficult to upgrade. Because of that Germans kept A5 versions but sold the previous versions as second hand. They’re upgrading A5’s to A6 and A7. The only A5 or newer variants outside are directly bought as first hand (i.e. Greece, Spain etc.).
I think this will clear the why.
Okay, if the problem were the upgrading armour, I'd say: Roketsan has already solved the armor problem then!
1615484078383.png
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,501
Solutions
2
Reactions
118 24,879
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
If this is the case then it is outrageously expensive! Even with an Altay turret!
I don't know about the source but it depends on how did they mention it.
Did they mention +250 as "optional" or "second batch".
Like "upgrade will be done in two batches of 81 and 250 units,or
"upgrade of 81 will be done, 250 are optional"
Also it is very less likely for remaining leopards not to be upgrades. It matters how did they mention it but it really seems expensive for an upgrade.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,247
Reactions
141 16,269
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
I don't know about the source but it depends on how did they mention it.
Did they mention +250 as "optional" or "second batch".
Like "upgrade will be done in two batches of 81 and 250 units,or
"upgrade of 81 will be done, 250 are optional"
Also it is very less likely for remaining leopards not to be upgrades. It matters how did they mention it but it really seems expensive for an upgrade.
The news was taken from Sozcu newspaper. It is literally copy pasted and is as is on my post. it says “81 + 250 (Opsiyon) “ .
 

Cypro

Contributor
Messages
665
Reactions
3 1,799
Nation of residence
Northern Cyprus
Nation of origin
Northern Cyprus
If it is 700 million Euros for 81 Leo UPGRADEs, this is a huge corruption. If it has not embargoed you could buy brand new 2A7s for that price! I really liked Roketsan upgrade, it looks very simple, enough and cost effective. Years ago when NG project failed or did not happen, I was thinking the same, why not create a hybrid Tank like General Dynamics MBT2000, put brand new Altay turret on Leo2, chassis is mostly have same specs, even Leo1s and M60s could get a new Turret, may be a smaller one. But no way that an upgrade cost same money with a brand new Tank.

What would BMC do? Engine is same, chassis is same, Aselsan will do electronics and electro optics, Gun is same.. what is BMC doing? Manufacturing turret with imported armor? or armor from another firm? Unbelievable if it is true.

At least I prefer them equally splitting the whole fleet into 2 and going for both Roketsan and BMC solution
 
Last edited:

Combat-Master

Baklava Consumer
Moderator
Messages
3,667
Reactions
15 25,474
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
According to reports in the Korean media, an official from Doosan Infracore said, "After the installation of the power package that combines the engine we developed and the transmission of SNT (S&T Dynamics), we signed a contract to conduct a performance test on the Altay tank." explanation came.


Foreign powerpack will be used until national powerpack 'BATU' is ready.
 
A

ATG

Guest
81+250 =331
700 ÷331 =2.110.000

roketsan armor +aselsan akkor and vs vs


 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom