Search results

It is Azerbaycan's land even the corridor. Which is why border gate is necessary for surveillance, and even the cities that Armenians are going to hold will be on Azerbaycan soil. So armed forces would be a violation of the signed treaty.

They may as well move those posts further in to what will be autonomous areas.

I wonder how they've solved the battery issue during winter.

Cavusoglu explaining the outcome.

I was thinking Azerbaycan needs to build proper border gate with high tech gear to have an eye on what passes through. I don't think it would violate the agreement.

Video in Turkish about agriculture, support etc. Technology is going to increase efficiency, reduce manpower need etc. But are electric vehicles really good for heavy duty ? no charging station needed because it's built-in... eh... charging time kind of depends on ampere.

https://www.dailysabah.com/world/africa/icc-haftars-forces-booby-trapped-homes-harmed-civilians-constituting-war-crime

We're already building supply vessels for companies like Esvagt. Would these vessels have similar capabilities or would they have more research facilities ? Also would TN be present on these ships for security ?

I asked for clarification on Lacin as I understood from the text it's Azerbaycan's land. Seems like a good video. Pros/cons according to video: Pro 1. corridor to Nakcivan 2. kelbecer, Lacin, Agdam, won on the table (was ours to begin with anyway) 3. we didn't lose any more troops 4...

I think economic difficulties are what makes it hard for Russia to develop capable systems. It's proof of what restriction on economy means for arms industry.

https://www.hurriyetdailynews.com/ankaras-city-council-changes-name-of-avenue-after-residents-complaints-159911 I hope you guys are OK with this :D

TC lands in the south are hopefully talked about and discussed. But the twitter says TC lands in south aren’t being discussed.

I wrote a message to Cavusoglu on twitter and asked that Azerbaycan construct high tech bordergate with surveillance systems and such. Even if Russia is going to patrol the corridor I want Azerbaycan to keep track of what goes in and out.

Well, considering how the country has evolved I would say it's a big meatgrinder that can't seem to restructure it's armed forces, and society. Massive potential, but I don't see Egypt escaping from their situation. Secularism is good, but there are too many rogue factors that insists pulling...

In worst case Nakcivan stays as it is. Nothing lost, nothing gained. I find it more important to implement security and surveillance systems in Karabag after the way this campaign has ended. Call it trust issues.

https://www.dailysabah.com/politics/diplomacy/turkey-kyrgyzstan-sign-deal-for-maarif-foundation-schools I hope this is going to be good for Kyrgyzistan.

I don't think we can rule out some impact of it. But I don't see why it should have such a big impact on Turkey, unless BionTech has decided vaccine production in Turkey is a must and the second one by Pzifer (in US).

Selcuk Bayrakter declared hero

That is why I am saying Azerbaycan needs to establish bordergates for transport and fully equip it. Someone with government contact should tell them. Russians may patrol, but the infrastructure should be of our choosing. Russia can't say no to that. Massive China/Israel style surveillance...

214'u unuttum ama :(