Search results

He politically mentions 25 years, general or whatever. Türkiye had 1000km missiles since 25 years ago and played dead in geopolitics? Absolute nonsense.

No, he is not.

The best way to display industry outlook is to use a webpage with some JavaScript functionality, static pictures are not very accessible. I have one for several industries which I keep updating but it needs to have script access to display on this forum. Anyway, takes time.

What do you mean "glass"? If you mean optics it is part of the helmet mounted tracking device.

Like an Elvis Presley impersonator, but can he sing and dance as good as Elvis (TB2).

When making an engine like this you don't gauge the engine quality by dialing in hours, you apply certain ttechnologies and get an acceptable endurance. Probably the highest stressed components of the engine which are the bearings can only last 17 hours and this determines the engine life. So...

No it can not. But it can operate for 17 hours without breaking. An air vehicle that is powered by one of these engines can not possibly carry enough fuel to fuel it for more than a couple hours let alone 17.

They have started development earlier than Türkiye so they have already made their planes and all. Their products may not be very mature and reliable but they are there.

We need 7 years to catch up with the defense sector level of China at this rate.

A system should be developed to use a 5.56 handheld machine gun in an automated fashion. Like a helmet mounted tracking device detects a drone and directs the soldier to point the gun in the proximate direction. The gun then can be made to align itself freely in the soldiers hand for precision...

Nukes is more preferrable as evident by the fact that all powerful militaries have them. Just make them in tactical sizes to avoid excessive collatetal damage.

We still have no idea what exactly Fergâni Space will be doing but I guess they will keep looking for opporrunities to find underserved space fields of work.

I watched the video again, there is no mention of the word turbofan but the tone of the wording implies a better technology than just turbojet. The likelyhood of it being a turbofan is like 70% from these words.

To be more specific, can a ballistic missile that can go to 2500 distance towards the west go to 3000km distance towards the east? There maybe forces working for or against the missile but at the end is this a known fact that the missile goes further in one direction than the other?

Question: Does a rocket launched towards the east burn less fuel for the same distance than a rocket launched towards the west? In other words, does the rocket travel a longer distance towards the east, say 3000km while it can travel 2700km towards the west?

I would develop the technology and not borrow it.

I have a business card of Temel Kotil, many people have, I am not even in defense sector.

You can view the First Flight Countdown Timer through the link in my signature.

We need a countdown clock to 10:00 18/03/2023