Iirc i read somewhere CFAKR will be based on STR!It is AIRS. It really looks similar to the ÇFAKR (Multi-Function Fire Control Radar) of Siper but there are subtle differences.
Iirc i read somewhere CFAKR will be based on STR!It is AIRS. It really looks similar to the ÇFAKR (Multi-Function Fire Control Radar) of Siper but there are subtle differences.
No STR is S-band, this is X band.Iirc i read somewhere CFAKR will be based on STR!
It is AIRS. It really looks similar to the ÇFAKR (Multi-Function Fire Control Radar) of Siper but there are subtle differences.
It seems the truck isnt BMC either so I got 2/2 wrong, fucking hell lool.
WTF didn't we have problems manufacturing enough KORKUT's ?Mr Görgün: "We started to export KORKUTs. It goes to different countries and the demand is very high. There is demand from many different countries."
We did not get kicked out from program because of S-400 that was just offical excuse.How comparable is S-400 to SIPER?
I understand that S-400 is an alltogether package air defence but can't KORKUT + HISAR + SIPER layered air defence be enough?
Is S-400 a stopgap until we get SIPER rolling? I feel like we got kicked out the F35 program for nothing..
S-400 is an insurance policy to protect us from Western belligerency. Western military reports show that export versions of S-400's can engage F-35's in a 35 km radius. That is sufficient to protect Ankara, for example.How comparable is S-400 to SIPER?
I understand that S-400 is an alltogether package air defence but can't KORKUT + HISAR + SIPER layered air defence be enough?
Is S-400 a stopgap until we get SIPER rolling? I feel like we got kicked out the F35 program for nothing..
And also, this.We did not get kicked out from program because of S-400 that was just official excuse.
Who would attack Turkiye and Ankara out of nowhere? Is it from NATO countries?S-400 is an insurance policy to protect us from Western belligerency. Western military reports show that export versions of S-400's can engage F-35's in a 35 km radius. That is sufficient to protect Ankara, for example.
Are you kidding?Who would attack Turkiye and Ankara out of nowhere? Is it from NATO countries?
We can learn the background of the S400 incident only when this government is gone.
It's funny when you say the S400 is insurance, what was our situation before we became the S400? Deterrence thanks to the S400?Are you kidding?
Bro 35km engagement range is trash LoL. At this point F-35 already launched its 8 SDB's to your S-400.. And also with F-35s radar electronic attack, that detection range will decrease more..S-400 is an insurance policy to protect us from Western belligerency. Western military reports show that export versions of S-400's can engage F-35's in a 35 km radius. That is sufficient to protect Ankara, for example.
And also, this.
Hey sorry... I'm new my previous post meant to reply to you. So i copy here also.Who would attack Turkiye and Ankara out of nowhere? Is it from NATO countries?
We can learn the background of the S400 incident only when this government is gone.
These are known things and this subject has been written and talked about a lot. It's pointless to discuss it here again, we can't learn the background of this government until it's gone. Either we shouldn't have bought it at all, or what's the point of getting the S-400 while the Samp-T is standing still? Is it because it's the most effective air defense system? It is also clear that there is no technology transfer, otherwise they would always shout.Hey sorry... I'm new my previous post meant to reply to you. So i copy here also.
I remember all about t- loramids programme. It was turkish long range air defense programme. First it was given directly to raytheon for patriot missile. 1 year later we wittness from wikileaks documents. If you search through this wikileaks you can find it. The amount for patriots was never mentioned from turkish government but during an interview from Obama he mention about 8 billions dollars.
Meanwhile we have a law who prohibit to make direct purchase for such amount. So per law we have to do a tender. (This part it's important, during time defense minister has to resign and an oppenent come in charge using this argument)
Raytheon denounce to enter a tender. Russians denounce a sale of a s400 to a nato country because it's a jewel and enter with s300pmu and chinese with fd2000.
Americans oppose chinese systems and after and syria crisis appears.
If you want i can continue... but seems to me long so pm me