where reported that many foreigners died and even a general from Poland?
Conspiracy. No Polish general was killed. Anyway, this is going off topic now.
where reported that many foreigners died and even a general from Poland?
you saying that there were no air defense near those air bases are also a conspiracy. When we know that Ukraine use air deffence these days close to the border. Russia shared the name of the general that has not been seen after that at least, but nothing about destroyed targets?Conspiracy. No Polish general was killed. Anyway, this is going off topic now.
When we know that Ukraine use air deffence these days close to the border. Russia shared the name of the general that has not been seen after that at least, but nothing about destroyed targets?
you saying that there were no air defense near those air bases are also a conspiracy.
i clearly said the KKB building in Kiev, why it was not protected? you just keep changing the topic..You are making wild claims without any proof or evidence. If someone dies and Russia share his name, doesn't mean Russians actually killed him. Poland officially confirmed the death of an army general due to natural cause. Believe it or not, people dies for normal reasons. And Frankly, Poles are lot more trustworthy than Russians.
Nope, Ukraine operates four MIM-104 batteries as of now and it is well known that those are deployed at Kiev and Kharkiv. Sometimes one is utilized for SAM ambushes.
Three Iskander SRBM strike happened in two Ukrainian air bases destroying several aircrafts in July and August. Those bases are Myrhorod and Dolgintsevo. Neither is remotely close to Kiev or Kharkiv.
I wonder if Mete can be turned into a small guided missile against drones with proximity or timed fuse. It's pretty much a 40 mm grenade with a rocket behind it and a guidance system in front of it, it would have a greater range and might be more accurate.SARP with 40 mm ATOM
With AI-powered algorithms and open system architecture, the SARP Remote Controlled Weapon Systems become indispensable in the field by enabling early detection and neutralization of drone threats.
So is a 40 mm grenade, only thing different in ATOM is its electronic fuse so it can explode while still in the air instead of wherever it might it. I can't see why they would need to change "a lot of parts" in Mete on top of a proximity fuse or timed fuse instead of its semi-active laser so that it could fly towards the target and, well, explode.METE is designed to be used against stationary targets. So IMHO you would need to change a lot parts of METE.
It shoulde be 40mm atom ammunution
So finally, ASELSAN has delivered C-UAS capability to SARP RCWS (Yes, including 12.7 mm ones)
By my understanding, this is not just about adding Mk19 with Atom on a SARP but a software addition to Sarp consoles, maybe a separate C-UAS mode the operator can activate and use easily.So finally, ASELSAN has delivered C-UAS capability to SARP RCWS (Yes, including 12.7 mm ones)
Well, Mete is 50 cm long so lunchbox might be a bit too small but we can definitely fit a launcher with 6 Mete in a school bag for you mateAre we still taking into consideration small and compact RCWS solutions when we think of counter measures against drones and such ?
Or we just tossing idea around hoping it'll fit inside kids lunchbox at the same time ? I'd be onboard on that...![]()
Şahin still uses MK19 as far as I know, just with a shortened barrel and autoloader and its range (again iirc) is half of what MK19 itself is. Sarp system can use MK19 but as you said I can't remember seeing it on video either.I would very like to see a Mk19 on Sarp in video though. I wonder how it is different than Şahin directly.
I know that it can operate it, there are photos of it, and even Pars SOV vehicles have them. I meant video of it using ATOM in C-UAS role. Aselsan have been working on this for years. Below images should be at least 5 years old.0:30 min
0:25 min
Welp I missed that.Are you saying that this is not SARP, but SAHIN?
View attachment 70331
You can see it in the video below. Or what do you mean?
Well, ŞAHİN actually uses SARP RCWS, but it has some changes to fire control and most importantly Mk19 fitted with the programmers and stuff for ATOM munitions. You still need the latter to have Mk19 work in C-UAS role.By my understanding, this is not just about adding Mk19 with Atom on a SARP but a software addition to Sarp consoles, maybe a separate C-UAS mode the operator can activate and use easily.
I would very like to see a Mk19 on Sarp in video though. I wonder how it is different than Şahin directly.
I'm 90% sure Şahin is just one of the fruits of Aselsan's 40mm Atom project for base defense based on Sarp, so that tracks.Well, ŞAHİN actually uses SARP RCWS, but it has some changes to fire control and most importantly Mk19 fitted with the programmers and stuff for ATOM munitions. You still need the latter to have Mk19 work in C-UAS role.
But yes, it is more like a software upgrade and easily dispensable throughout platforms using the RCWS. Our 4x4s can act as non-dedicated C-UAS systems now including with machine guns.
and yes Strong AI, I really want to see a 7.62 mm gatling SARP-L shredding some drones like a micro Phalanx CIWS.
Actually hell, our UGVs can join this train too as the majority uses SARP RCWS. Just think of an TUNGA UGV protecting our infantry with a 7.62 mm gatling/12.7 mm HMG/40 mm ATOM