• Forum restore complete (see latest announcement thread)

TR Attack & Utility Helicopter Programs

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,804
Solutions
2
Reactions
148 26,907
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Well, 500kg(1100lbs) payload is very ambitious, the helicopter really has to grow and get much heavier if this payload range is targeted. Probably one of the most important requirements in naval rotary-wing drone will be flight endurance, keeping this payload in the air for a few hours, being able to prepare the system for flight in a very short time and and being small enough to fit in a vessel hangar is probably impossible with all electric engines. Open source specs for the Northop's MQ-8, which was tested on Bell-407 fuselage for a while, had 700lb payload cap and a maximum flight endurance of up to 12 hours. This was actually made possible by converting most of the helicopter cabin into a fuel tank.

It should also has a communication range 150-160 nautical miles, more likely SATCOM and TDL, advanced autopilot and redundant avionics, including the ability to autonomously return to the ship in the event of a connection failure. Some sort of lightweight radar, and kind of EO/IR system should also be in standard equipment. For the ASW mission, it will also require a dipping sonar breakout, as well as a sonobuoy pod, and integration of various launchers or hardpoint pylons for various weapon systems.

If what is mentioned as 500kg on Turdef news is the external payload capacity; I get the idea that TITRA's targeted unmanned helicopter could be almost the size of a T625, which makes me think that TITRA is considering utilizing the TS-1400 on the turboshaft side. It could be a pretty big and high-budget aviation program, we'll see. But if they can pull it off, they could export this system to a number of NATO navies. trivia: ORKUN-2053, which has maximum diving depth of around 350m, weighs around 270kg. And the estimated weight of the light torpedo ORKA will probably not be less than 230-240kg.
Titra making a unmanned helicopter within the dimensions of T625 is technically and beyond technically impossible. Alpin itself is a licensed product / conversion project and Titra has little to none, and indifferentiable amount of knowledge on mechanical know-how of an helicopter in comparison to TAI. What i would like to see here is a drone powered by PD seriee, or PG 115 to begin with altogether with Titra's experience i am not confident on this.

What could they achieve, realistically, is a 500 kg total payload (fuel, external, sensor etc.) drone with 1 tonnes MTOW, capped.
 

Shtr

Committed member
Messages
167
Reactions
6 303
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
The first 3 ones are already ready If I recall correctly. Let's see how many will be produced until end of 2025. Some optimist experts predict around 500 Gökbey will be sold but I guess it can reach up to 1000. I hope we can reach very quickly monthly 3-4 production rate.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,270
Reactions
258 22,300
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
The news is about Kirpi II,what T-70 are you talking about?
Initially that is what I thought too. But he mentions acceptance of delivery of a quantity of T-70 helicopters. Just listen carefully. 30th second: “çeşitli miktarlarda T-70 genel maksat helikopteri”
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
Initially that is what I thought too. But he mentions acceptance of delivery of a quantity of T-70 helicopters. Just listen carefully. 30th second: “çeşitli miktarlarda T-70 genel maksat helikopteri”
Shouldnt that be written first or at least noted as well since the news about Kirpi is not as important as the T-70 ?
Bad journalism,as usual.
 

Turkic

Well-known member
Messages
320
Reactions
5 629
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Shouldnt that be written first or at least noted as well since the news about Kirpi is not as important as the T-70 ?
Bad journalism,as usual.

Isn't building an indigenious vehicle with an indigenious engine more important than producing a Sikorsky heli locally ? Ig they thought the way I do.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
4,270
Reactions
258 22,300
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
Isn't building an indigenious vehicle with an indigenious engine more important than producing a Sikorsky heli locally ? Ig they thought the way I do.
Although I respect your line of thought, I don’t agree with it.

A low powered internal combustion engined fighting vehicle with very low tech input.
vs
A helicopter that is more than 70% locally produced with state of the art local tech avionics and engines where most of it , including hot parts are locally manufactured , albeit under licence.

Thanks to such under licence production, we managed to build our TS-1400 turbo shaft engine. And our TF6000 turbofan.

I am by no means, talking down what we have achieved in Kirpi . But it is no big feat of engineering. Many companies in Turkey and around the world can produce such an engine and Kirpi like fighting vehicles.

There aren’t many countries that can manufacture a T-70 helicopter though.

T-70 production is a bit of a sore point for all Turks at the moment as the time for the license is running out and the 109 number of units that we urgently need will be short delivered by around 70. So it is important that these well delayed deliveries are realised.
Any one that is privy to this info will appreciate the urgency and the importance of any news regarding T-70 Blackhawks.
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
Isn't building an indigenious vehicle with an indigenious engine more important than producing a Sikorsky heli locally ? Ig they thought the way I do.

@Yasar_TR abi post plus,you cant compare a Kirpi to a T-70.
You can take out 20(at least) Kirpi's with a single T-70(fully weaponized).
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
@Turkic ,

For a country the size of ours we need at least 300 T-70 sized helicopters,we only have around 120 isch(dont know exactly).
The Bell's are obsolete.
At least 50 more Chinook sized Helicopters,we only 11 Chinooks and 10 or so Mil 17's(old).

So,what do you think is more important the fully indigenous Kirpi or the helicopters?
You must know we lack in air platforms.
 

Turkic

Well-known member
Messages
320
Reactions
5 629
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Although I respect your line of thought, I don’t agree with it.

A low powered internal combustion engined fighting vehicle with very low tech input.
vs
A helicopter that is more than 70% locally produced with state of the art local tech avionics and engines where most of it , including hot parts are locally manufactured , albeit under licence.

Thanks to such under licence production, we managed to build our TS-1400 turbo shaft engine. And our TF6000 turbofan.

I am by no means, talking down what we have achieved in Kirpi . But it is no big feat of engineering. Many companies in Turkey and around the world can produce such an engine and Kirpi like fighting vehicles.

There aren’t many countries that can manufacture a T-70 helicopter though.

T-70 production is a bit of a sore point for all Turks at the moment as the time for the license is running out and the 109 number of units that we urgently need will be short delivered by around 70. So it is important that these well delayed deliveries are realised.
Any one that is privy to this info will appreciate the urgency and the importance of any news regarding T-70 Blackhawks.
@Turkic ,

For a country the size of ours we need at least 300 T-70 sized helicopters,we only have around 120 isch(dont know exactly).
The Bell's are obsolete.
At least 50 more Chinook sized Helicopters,we only 11 Chinooks and 10 or so Mil 17's(old).

So,what do you think is more important the fully indigenous Kirpi or the helicopters?
You must know we lack in air platforms.

All you say is right, I must have been misspoken. I'm exhausted lately so sorry about it.. My intention was to mean which one is more important in people's thoughts. Since we had troubles with military engines which are widely spoken in media, people would care about indigenious land engines more than a heli. Think this: Can Erdoğan say "hey people, we've built a heli under license" ? He can't because we already made Gökbey, right ? People wouldn't care about it because who will tell them the difference between Gökbey and T70 or who will tell them the importance of T70 program to us. But he can come out and say "hey people, they pissed us by not giving engines to us. And now we made it on our own"

That was what I meant to say.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
T

TR_123456

Guest
All you say is right, I must have been misspoken. I'm exhausted lately so sorry about it.. My intention was to mean which one is more important in people's thoughts. Since we had troubles with military engines which are widely spoken in media, people would care about indigenious land engines more than a heli. Think this: Can Erdoğan say "hey people, we've built a heli under license" ? He can't because we already made Gökbey, right ? People wouldn't care about it because who will tell them the difference between Gökbey and T70 or who will tell them the importance of T70 program to us. But he can come out and say "hey people, they pissed us by not giving engines to us. And now we made it on our own"

That was what I meant to say.
No problem,dont say sorry for asking,its your right as well as it is our obligation to inform you about the importance of air assets.
Just think this,the most important engine we need is the indigenous KAAN engine then the fuel cell engine for subs the helicopter engine(almost finished,certification) and for the land forces(MBT engine).
I would put them in that order.
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
2,265
Solutions
1
Reactions
42 6,641
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
For a country the size of ours we need at least 300 T-70 sized helicopters,we only have around 120 isch(dont know exactly).
The Bell's are obsolete.
At least 50 more Chinook sized Helicopters,we only 11 Chinooks and 10 or so Mil 17's(old).
I am really curious why aren't we trying to get into more partnerships with Agusta Westland like T129 while we wait for our own platforms to mature and get ready for production. Hell, they even have a tilt rotor we can possibly use on Anadolu and Trakya if we could get it.
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
I am really curious why aren't we trying to get into more partnerships with Agusta Westland like T129 while we wait for our own platforms to mature and get ready for production. Hell, they even have a tilt rotor we can possibly use on Anadolu and Trakya if we could get it.
What partnership would you suggest?
Which of our future projects would need a tilt rotor and did you think of the operational costs of a tilt rotor?
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
2,265
Solutions
1
Reactions
42 6,641
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
What partnership would you suggest?
Which of our future projects would need a tilt rotor and did you think of the operational costs of a tilt rotor?
Tilt rotor was just something I like, that's not main reason I said partnership. Aw101 (Merlin) or AW189 could help us with our short term needs, if a deal could be reached of course.
 
T

TR_123456

Guest
Tilt rotor was just something I like, that's not main reason I said partnership. Aw101 (Merlin) or AW189 could help us with our short term needs, if a deal could be reached of course.
We would have to buy them,finished products.
 

boredaf

Experienced member
Messages
2,265
Solutions
1
Reactions
42 6,641
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
We would have to buy them,finished products.
That could work as well, as you pointed out we need to renew our helicopters, but we could also try to get license to build it like we did with T129. Even if US made helicopters are the best, but out of our reach and ours are some time away (especially with our own engines) it might be better to think about alternatives like these instead of twiddling our thumbs until we are ready.
 
Top Bottom