TR Attack & Utility Helicopter Programs

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,236
Reactions
48 20,879
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
In that case cancelling the T629 makes even less sense because the weight was much closer to T129 and that in itself would mean that we would have been able to deliver our own engine to a combat helicopter much sooner than a drawing on a paper.

with drones and loitering ammo in the air, and with Ukraine shooting down a fighterjet with a drone we've entered a new era, and all we got is Gökbey with CTS-800.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,445
Reactions
176 17,643
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
In that case cancelling the T629 makes even less sense because the weight was much closer to T129 and that in itself would mean that we would have been able to deliver our own engine to a combat helicopter much sooner than a drawing on a paper.

with drones and loitering ammo in the air, and with Ukraine shooting down a fighterjet with a drone we've entered a new era, and all we got is Gökbey with CTS-800.
Apart from Attack helicopters becoming natural and easy targets for drones and many air defence systems, T-129 has certain deficiencies that were subject for complaints. Being light and weak armoured were some of them. It had balancing issues. The force really had it’s hearts set in a heavy Atak-2.
But currently, the Atak helicopter fills in the need for our attack helicopter needs. It performs really well in the terrain it is operated.
We have to prioritise where we need to invest carefully in the short term. A T-925 is more urgent than a heavier attack helicopter at the moment. Armed forces etc have nearly 80+ of T-129 delivered or about to be delivered. There is no immediate need for more.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom