Azerbaijan Azerbaijan Defence Forum

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
956
Reactions
18 2,514
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
This is what they cite:


I have no idea what this website is (or I do, you can guess the origin when you read the sentence below), but:

“Azerbaijan reported that its recently purchased JF-17 temu jet persisted KLJ-7A radar and engine failure.“

JF-17 "temu jet"? Really? Not only is it an entirely fabricated claim, but what serious site would use words like that?

Do "aze.media" not possess even a little bit of critical thinking to understand that this is not a serious source?

Besides, even if there were no political obstacles for Azerbaijan to purchase Western fighter jets, why would it be Gripen at all? Fighter jet procurements are as much political as they are technical, and I can’t think of how Sweden would be even a consideration for Azerbaijan. It’s not a particularly friendly country to Azerbaijan to begin with.
Discussions about purchasing JF-17 Thunder fighters from Pakistan began 20 years ago (!). Baku was in no rush, rejecting the purchase of Block 1 and skipping Block 2. Despite purchasing 16 MiG-29s from Ukraine in 2007, abandoning the Pakistani fighters was never even discussed. We carefully and thoroughly considered the matter, and when Block 3 was ready, we chose it.

There were reasons for this.

First, purchasing military aircraft is a military-political step of strategic significance;

2. We are still under US and EU sanctions;

3. Sweden is not a country with which we can establish strategic relations;

4. Having the JF-17 Thunder, purchasing fighters of the same class is an extremely unwise decision;

5. We are part of the KAAN project and are not looking for alternatives.

Yes, the report is probably fake.
 
Last edited:

Okaber

Active member
Messages
71
Reactions
3 279
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
Discussions about purchasing JF-17 Thunder fighters from Pakistan began 20 years ago (!). Baku was in no rush, rejecting the purchase of Block 1 and skipping Block 2. Despite purchasing 16 MiG-29s from Ukraine in 2007, abandoning the Pakistani fighters was never even discussed. We carefully and thoroughly considered the matter, and when Block 3 was ready, we chose it.

There were reasons for this.

First, purchasing military aircraft is a military-political step of strategic significance;

2. We are still under US and EU sanctions;

3. Sweden is not a country with which we can establish strategic relations;

4. Having the JF-17 Thunder, purchasing fighters of the same class is an extremely unwise decision;

5. We are part of the KAAN project and are not looking for alternatives.

Yes, the report is probably fake.

Indeed, Azerbaijani pilots did test earlier blocks of JF-17 but did not found them to be an upgrade over Mig-29. That changed with Block III.

Azerbaijan also negotiated with Russia for new fighter jets and airforce commanders even visited Russian aircraft manufacturing plants, with Azerbaijani pilots undergoing training in Russia but as you know Ukraine war happened.

IMG_4696.jpeg
 
Last edited:

Okaber

Active member
Messages
71
Reactions
3 279
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
We are still under US and EU sanctions;

It’s up to individual states, there isn’t really EU sanctions as a block. Azerbaijan has bought howitzers and many other things from Czechia and Slovakia (there is also joint defence industry cooperation with Slovakia), transport aircrafts and some other things from Italy, radars from Spain.

UK recently lifted the ban.


Minister of defence industry and deputy minister of MOD (head of military-technical department) visited UK last week.


Lanza LTR-25 (Spain).

IMG_4663.jpeg


As for US, that’s a bit more complicated. For US to start selling serious hardware to Azerbaijan, the first step would be to remove section 907 completely, which can only happen via congress.
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom