India Coffee House

Ryder

Experienced member
Messages
10,857
Reactions
6 18,707
Nation of residence
Australia
Nation of origin
Turkey
Honestly its pretty saddening to see this regardless if I agree or disagree with him.

I dont get why segments of my community instead of educating themselves and becoming intelligent by debating prefer resorting to violence instead.

Seriously shitty optics.
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,761
Reactions
119 19,778
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
August 15th, our independence day is here again.

Best wishes to India, Indians and all their well-wishers.

1660591552229.png
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,761
Reactions
119 19,778
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
@Jackdaws @T-123456 et al.

You might find this interview of one Pakistani historian (I. Ahmed) response to another one's publication (A. Jalal) interesting.

It gives a (strict evidence based) counter perspective to some arguably more fanciful projections that have been developed w.r.t Jinnah...like Ayesha Jalal and others have espoused.

Turkey + Ataturk brought up around 28 minute mark as one example of this, but whole interview is worth watching for full context.

His (Ishtiaq Ahmed) books are worth reading for anyone interested in the topic (Partition) more broadly.

 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,090
Reactions
12,691
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
@Jackdaws @T-123456 et al.

You might find this interview of one Pakistani historian (I. Ahmed) response to another one's publication (A. Jalal) interesting.

It gives a (strict evidence based) counter perspective to some arguably more fanciful projections that have been developed w.r.t Jinnah...like Ayesha Jalal and others have espoused.

Turkey + Ataturk brought up around 28 minute mark as one example of this, but whole interview is worth watching for full context.

His (Ishtiaq Ahmed) books are worth reading for anyone interested in the topic (Partition) more broadly.

Yeah,i disagree.
Only after his death the ''Islamic'''was added.
So,why not call it ''Islamic Republic of Pakistan'' from the beginning?
Why was it called ''Pakistan'' only?
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,761
Reactions
119 19,778
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
Yeah,i disagree.
Only after his death the ''Islamic'''was added.
So,why not call it ''Islamic Republic of Pakistan'' from the beginning?
Why was it called ''Pakistan'' only?

Well the constitution was not drafted yet to do that kind of thing (Jinnah around for it or not).

India was a dominion for 3 years before it became a republic.....and Pakistan stayed a dominion till 1956 or so iirc.

So in Pakistan's case a great deal was determined by what Jinnah set in motion (by the process he went about eking out islamic majoritarian concept, especially by conveniently asserting that all muslims in south asia were a separate nation, not just those where they were a majority).

After all the constituent assembly (which Jinnah was president of till he died) would pass the objectives resolution that would imbue the islamic characteristics (and first involving the state in determining who is and isn't muslim) into the constitution itself.

It is not like the relevant influential people in that assembly were out of concert with Jinnah, or suddenly changed their minds from what was made up already when they consulted with Jinnah around in the many years prior (before, during and after partition).

These were all things set in motion already....becoming an Islamic republic in 1956 was crossing the t's and dotting the i's essentially.

The interview covers what is on the record from Jinnah own actions and decision making....that were plainly inconsistent if he was behind a secular approach (that he claimed/asserted a few times - to most likely improve his sides bargaining position by starting with maximalist approach).

How does secular even reconcile with the islamic-majoritarian process (for asserted and then realised nationhood) to begin with?

Shouldn't secular approach not care about religion at all from the get go?

You would have to use another identity for majoritarian nation-forming other than religion surely?

I might expand on this if there is interest on this topic.

Going to try get @Joe Shearer and @saiyan to give their 2 cents here a bit later hopefully too.
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,090
Reactions
12,691
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Well the constitution was not drafted yet to do that kind of thing (Jinnah around for it or not).

India was a dominion for 3 years before it became a republic.....and Pakistan stayed a dominion till 1956 or so iirc.

So in Pakistan's case a great deal was determined by what Jinnah set in motion (by the process he went about eking out islamic majoritarian concept, especially by conveniently asserting that all muslims in south asia were a separate nation, not just those where they were a majority).

After all the constituent assembly (which Jinnah was president of till he died) would pass the objectives resolution that would imbue the islamic characteristics (and first involving the state in determining who is and isn't muslim) into the constitution itself.

It is not like the relevant influential people in that assembly were out of concert with Jinnah, or suddenly changed their minds from what was made up already when they consulted with Jinnah around in the many years prior (before, during and after partition).

These were all things set in motion already....becoming an Islamic republic in 1956 was crossing the t's and dotting the i's essentially.

The interview covers what is on the record from Jinnah own actions and decision making....that were plainly inconsistent if he was behind a secular approach (that he claimed/asserted a few times - to most likely improve his sides bargaining position by starting with maximalist approach).

How does secular even reconcile with the islamic-majoritarian process (for asserted and then realised nationhood) to begin with?

Shouldn't secular approach not care about religion at all from the get go?

You would have to use another identity for majoritarian nation-forming other than religion surely?

I might expand on this if there is interest on this topic.

Going to try get @Joe Shearer and @saiyan to give their 2 cents here a bit later hopefully too.
Well,my country started as a Muslim majority,same thing no?
 

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,761
Reactions
119 19,778
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
Well,my country started as a Muslim majority,same thing no?

It's different....but each situation is different in the end.

Turkish republic did not found itself as simply the muslim homeland for say all of ottoman empire's muslims that preceded it (and say partitioned itself along these lines - i.e are you muslim or not and are you the majority of the area ).

It just inherited a population (by Turk identity enshrined as the final republic identity) that happened to be majority muslim.

If Turks had significant other religious make up (by whatever factor of history), the Turkish republic would still have been founded (as it has now) if the other historical factors proceeded overall same way and with Ataturks (or equivalent) conclusion.

i.e Modern Turkey did not follow a religion-majoritarian formation argument.
 

Afif

Experienced member
Moderator
Bangladesh Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Bangladesh Moderator
Messages
4,746
Reactions
94 9,067
Nation of residence
Bangladesh
Nation of origin
Bangladesh
MOD NOTE: ORIGINALLY POSTED IN TR foreign policy thread: https://defencehub.live/threads/turkish-foreign-policy-geopolitics.3951/page-88#post-209244

=========

UNTERSTANDING TURKISH LONG TERM FOREIGN POLICY STRATEGY IN EAST ASIA AND SOME OTHER THOUGHTS.

The malesyian king's visit in turkey recently as well as the malesyian prime minister's visit with high level military and civilian delegation earlier this year, it can be interpreted as a primary steps for the beginning of a long term strategic relationship between two countries in term geopolitical and geoeconomic security cooperation based maximum mutual trust and benefits. Later, in coming decades it has the potential of leading to further strategic cooperation in defence and military technology. And hopefully the similer steps will be taken with Indonesia and Bangladesh soon.

However, there are two other big regional actors with whom turkish foreign policy is quite complicated and not so obvious for many, how should the future strategy look like with india and pakistan. Now, it is clear pakistan cannot offer any economic benefits in near future. While on the other hand it is possible to have relatively larger trade volume with india.

But at the same time turkish unconditional support for pakistan regime on every position may complicate the relation with india. So the best way for turkey is seems to be able follow a delicate balancing path between two countries and not get involved with every regional issues in support of pakistan ( except turkish position on kashmir and india's oppression of its muslim minority should be clear ) and have a good trade relationship with india while not compromising the strategic security relationship with pakistan ( I wrote about it in some details in TFX thread page 194 why it is important for turkey ).

And as the recent conflict between russia and ukraine shows turkey has the ability to do so ( following a balancing act. )

Now, BORCHADINHO! As i said in 'refugee problem thread page 34' I will reflect on your comment on my post here.

1. Bangladesh shouldn't be considered in the same category with india. ( the socio-cultural landscape is simply different ) My assessment is, seeking more stronger ties with india ( on a greater level then I suggested above here ) is 'probably a reactionary thinking' from being disgusted by Pakistanis. From a rational Point of view, this is simply not possible to have strategic cooperation with india on any level because of not only the cultural difference,but the tremendous civilizational different between turkey and india. However, a large trade volume is achievable like china and usa has. but they don't have any strategic cooperation becouse they are simply two different civilization. The same is true with turkey and india.

But most importantly, I don't think turkey is in need to establish a strategic economic security relationship with india. Take For example, the two most fundemental economic securities are food and energy security. ( as ukraine war showed us how crucial to gain self reliance in both or at least diversify the sources in a strategic manner. ) Now in case of food security turkey is self reliant. In case of energy security india simply doesn't have any credible energy resources to offer. Ohter than that, in term of heavy industry, automobile, electronics and defence sector turkey simply doesn't want to depend on anybody for that matter and seek to be 100 percent self-reliant ( which, every developing nation should do )

Now, it is true as you said, indians largely speaking, doesn't export their problems to other countries as most of the Indian that lives aboard are highly educated and civilized, however they may not reflect the reality of the vast mejority who are in india. I suggesting some detailed reading in the indian history for the last 70 years in order to fully understand the treatment of its minority and its political framework for the oppression and massacre.

Without going too much into detail let's take the recent example, the Gujarat massacre of nearly two thousand muslim in 2002. ( of course, they wanna protray it as it was just a riot. But in riots people don't die by thousands ) and the guy was largely behind it is mr. Norendro modi ( infamously called 'the butcher of gujarat' ) who is now the current prime minister of india, nominated by BJP party. Now, the BJP is basically the political wing of the world largest fascist organization 'RSS'.

Sorry that i can't introduce them properly here, becouse for that at least thousands more word will be needed! However, in a nutshell, they literally believe in nazi ideology of aryaan race. And their cannon book the 'bunch of thought' (sound very innocent i know ) however, it identify the 'muslim population in genarel' ( not the terrorist or radicals ) as number one internal threat to india which mast be eliminated. consistently they radicalize hindu youth against the minorities and publicaly train them with lethal weapons. There are hidue religious leaders who are openly calls for mass killing of muslims. This incidents has been reported many times now. But i guess no one has to take my word for it. The reader can research for himself. ( however, it should be clear, I am not claiming, we don't have any kind of minority opresstion in Bangladesh. Surely! we do have problems! But these are simply not comparable to india. We have ten million hindu in Bangladesh. however, no one in my country trains youth with lethal weapons openly to fight against a 'perceived enemy.' No one with authority calling for mass killing of hindues! But most importantly There hasn't been any attempted massacre against hidus in 50 years. on the contrary, there are some major massacres of muslims took place in india in multiple region since the country was born. )

If anyone do some research on the the hate speech percentage in india these days, it is not that hard to find out how the situation is there right now! Or how many muslims got killed by hindu terrorists just for eating meets every year. ( and they weren't always even sure if it was cow's meet. ) In addition to that, i would suggest, you may also check out the video of dr. gregory stanton of GENOCIDEWATCH and his research on india recently. Now, in the cultural front you already know that pakistan has serious problem of honor killing! Things like that, what makes very hard to have a people to people cultural relationship between turkey and pakistan!

However, very few people knows india has it own honor killing problems. Which of course caused by tribalism. However unlike pakistan there is a major social norm in india that has significantly serious effect on every part of the society till this day. Which is the infamous classification of the 'FOUR CASTE' in indian society! ( it is very important to note that, this is not a socio economical classification which every society has. It is very unique DEEPLY RELIGIOUS and SOCIO-CULTURAL classification )

A lot of social behaviors is determined by it. Without going too much into that 'CLASSIFICATION' let's just say, even the most racist white supremacist person in the west will be stunned if they learned about how so called 'DALIT' caste is treated in india! The word itself mean 'untouchable'. And unfortunately, this is not a metaphor! It is literally means you cannot touch them or sit with them! India has one of the highest rape problem in the world. And this is partially becouse some fraction of the indian society tend to think that, so called 'Dalit women is 'available' for evrybody.

There was a famous case in 2020 where police itself burn the rape victim's body because they thought if the incident become public the superior class boys who rape the teen and killed her will be disrespected as these boys 'touched' a 'DALIT'. OVER ALL, LARGELY SPEAKING, INDIA ISN'T't CULTURALLY TOO DEVELOPED WHEN COMPARED TO THE PAKISTAN. AND FOR MINORITIES IT IS LITERALLY WORST!

2. You wrote, it is not turkish tax payers job to educate pakistanis! I am afraid this is a short sighted comment ( don't take it personally. ) first and foremost, I didn't say that. What I said is 'the only realistic way to help that Country for other developed muslims countries is to take a 'long term combined strategy ( this is very important becouse one country like turkey can't do it along ) and stablish as many schools and colleges as possible in pakistan and try to make an educational revolution for the next generations to come!'

It seems you don't know the strategic significant of investing in other country's public insfrastructure and institutions! It is a win win business in a long run! This is not a one way aid! Why do you think china is investing hundreds of billions dollars in africa and building schools, hospitals and roads? Damm! Why do think turkey itself investing in african countries ?

3. You said 'turkey was founded in a desperate time'. Surely it was, and the same is true with bangladesh. However, It doesn't seem very logical to me, to hold on that old desperate mindset from a century ago ( I am not accusing you of that, however I sense it from some people ) as you said in your post rightfully and as I said earlier, turkish identity should be based on turkish culture and turkish way of life not on race or color of skin. (So, of course turkish (or for that matter any other) national identity should not be 'sold' for cheap purpose nor should it be given to people who don't appreciate the turkish culture and don't embrace the turkish way of life. )

4. You wrote 'our cultures ( Bangladeshi and turkish ) couldn't be more different'. I don't think this is a very accurate discritption! ( If you mean, our food and clothing then it is largely true ) I am surprised that, you don't know the history of the famous turkic-afghan conqueror Muhammad bakhteyar khalgi! He conquered the bengal in 13th century.

It was how the first islamic rule began in our region and our identity was formed. More or less He was kinda for us like what uthman was for turkic tribes ( legend says, he defeated the ruling king with only 16 companions ) and later The ruling class of muslim bengal the 'NAWAB' was also of turkic origin. Actually, I am myself of turkic origin! And There is a lot of turkish words in bangla too! The most funny one is, if you say 'turki youth' in bengla it literally means ' a brave man' like a compliment (doesn't mean an actual turkish young person).


here are few references below.

www.aa.com.tr

Turkey, Malaysia agree to improve defense industry cooperation

Malaysia our top trade partner in ASEAN region of 650M people, says Foreign Minister Cavusoglu - Anadolu Agency
www.aa.com.tr
www.aa.com.tr
www.aa.com.tr

Türkiye determined to further deepen ties with Malaysia: President Erdogan

Bilateral ties advanced from level of strategic partnership to comprehensive strategic partnership, says Turkish president - Anadolu Agency
www.aa.com.tr
www.aa.com.tr
www.dailysabah.com

Turkey, Malaysia ties raised to comprehensive strategic partnership

Ankara and Kuala Lumpur, a significant regional partner, vowed to continue cooperating to counter several challenges, including Islamophobia, the...
www.dailysabah.com
www.dailysabah.com

www.aa.com.tr

Turkey, Indonesia eye ‘$10B bilateral trade volume’

Turkish president expected to visit Indonesia in early 2020, says Indonesia’s trade minister - Anadolu Agency
www.aa.com.tr
www.aa.com.tr
www.aa.com.tr

Turkey, Indonesia to enhance trade, defense cooperation

With 350 million population in both countries, trade volume is far below true potential, says Turkish foreign minister - Anadolu Agency
www.aa.com.tr
www.aa.com.tr
https://www.dailysabah.com/business...trengthen-aerospace-cooperation-with-new-deal


www.textiletoday.com.bd

Türkiye’s vision is to double the bilateral trade volume with Bangladesh

Textile Today team visited Türkiysh embassy in Dhaka on 1 June morning and had a conversation with H.E. Mustafa Osman Turan.
www.textiletoday.com.bd
www.dailysabah.com

Turkey-Bangladesh defense co-op ensures mutual benefits: Analysts

Both Turkey and Bangladesh will benefit economically and militarily from expansion in defense cooperation, according to analysts.Turkey is becoming a...
www.dailysabah.com
www.dailysabah.com

www.aa.com.tr

Turkish-African friendship gaining strength with cooperation in education, development, culture

As ties recently increased, Turkish institutions, NGOs have been leading education, development on continent - Anadolu Agency
www.aa.com.tr
www.aa.com.tr
studies.aljazeera.net

The Rise of Turkey in Africa | Al Jazeera Centre for Studies

The face and the fate of African continent in the 21st century is changing fast and its network of foreign relations is becoming more complex as new actors are interacting with African countries.
studies.aljazeera.net

en.wikipedia.org

Muhammad Bakhtiyar Khalji - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Nawabs of Bengal and Murshidabad - Wikipedia


en.wikipedia.org
en.wikipedia.org

Last edited: 5 minutes ago
 
Last edited:

Nilgiri

Experienced member
Moderator
Aviation Specialist
Messages
9,761
Reactions
119 19,778
Nation of residence
Canada
Nation of origin
India
If one is going to give a text wall rant/spam using genocidewatch and other piecemeal ad-hoc stitching together littered with anecdotal assertions....

Maybe one can simply check if the same basis is used for say Turkey w.r.t what genocidewatch lists as status alert and analysis for them....and check with Turkish members if they agree on it (rather than simply asserting it).

Or does genocide watch apply for A and not for B? (i.e a deep inconsistency in your root basis).

If so, its time to reform your case to something actually consistent from inside out.
 
Top Bottom