TR Foreign Policy & Geopolitics

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,374
Reactions
103 15,238
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Bloomberg:

"According to Turkish officials familiar with the matter, the Turkish president will seek deals ranging from defence to energy worth tens of billions of dollars. Turkey plans to buy 40 F-35 jets, 40 F-16 Vipers and ammunition, including bombs and missiles, the officials said. The two sides are still negotiating the price of the F-16s, the officials said."
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,325
Reactions
41 9,280
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
It really doesn't matter what Mr Trump would say or whether he agrees to reintroduce Türkiye to the F-35 clique or not.
In the end the Zionist lobby will get what it wants and he will succumb. Like the ones before him he's under the grip of AIPAC and other Zionist "NGOs".
In addition to that, Mr Erdogan is going to hold a speech at the UN assembly and it's going to be about Gaza. As usual, as soon as there are signs of thawing in the US-Turkish relations, he chooses to say something to piss off the Zionists who run the entire United States politics.

That being said, I find it important to speak for the injustice that is happening to Palestinians in Gaza and the illegal settlements in the West Bank and Jerusalem, but the timing is just right to sabotage any deals involving the US, Especially after the latest word sparring between Mr Netenyahu and Mr Erdogan.

The Israeli news outlets are voicing concerns about Turkish military power and the naval drills of Turkish-Egyptian navies in the East Med.

In conclusion, I say no matter how warm and positive the meeting would be, there's next to no chance that anything would change but I'd like to be wrong.
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,374
Reactions
103 15,238
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Bloomberg:

"According to Turkish officials familiar with the matter, the Turkish president will seek deals ranging from defence to energy worth tens of billions of dollars. Turkey plans to buy 40 F-35 jets, 40 F-16 Vipers and ammunition, including bombs and missiles, the officials said. The two sides are still negotiating the price of the F-16s, the officials said."
"Turkey had backed away from purchasing the F-16s and relayed this to US officials. Key members of Congress pushed back, telling they saw Turkey’s acquisition as a confidence-building step, my sources on the Hill said. From Trump’s remarks, it appears he will press Ankara to proceed with the deal — and Ankara has complied."

 

Khagan1923

Contributor
Messages
1,155
Reactions
18 4,900
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
"Turkey had backed away from purchasing the F-16s and relayed this to US officials. Key members of Congress pushed back, telling they saw Turkey’s acquisition as a confidence-building step, my sources on the Hill said. From Trump’s remarks, it appears he will press Ankara to proceed with the deal — and Ankara has complied."

I expect a possible addition of the KC-46 to this list.

To sweeten the deal, there might be promises of Türkiye returning to industrial participation in the future TBD.

Contrary to others I do not think we are going to forego the purchase of the Eurofighter.

Because 1. I think it would do serious damage to the relations we have built with the Brits over the last few years especially after they put so much work into convincing Germany 2. Airbus might get slighted by this and it could have negative ripple effects on other projects also 3. I think the Air Force really wants a non-American Fighter in its inventory.
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,325
Reactions
41 9,280
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
I expect a possible addition of the KC-46 to this list.

To sweeten the deal, there might be promises of Türkiye returning to industrial participation in the future TBD.

Contrary to others I do not think we are going to forego the purchase of the Eurofighter.

Because 1. I think it would do serious damage to the relations we have built with the Brits over the last few years especially after they put so much work into convincing Germany 2. Airbus might get slighted by this and it could have negative ripple effects on other projects also 3. I think the Air Force really wants a non-American Fighter in its inventory.
The KC-46 is a very problematic aircraft, I'd rather go for the Airbus MRTT or build custom ones with Airbus as JV with TAI.
 

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
780
Reactions
14 2,044
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
It wasn't. It was designed for Harriers. It needs large modifications on its flight deck to be able to handle F-35B operations.
I came across an article in a Russian military publication that mentions the Harrier. It says Indonesia has decided to purchase the aircraft carrier Giuseppe Garibaldi from Italy, but without the Harriers. Helicopters and Turkish TB3 UAVs will be carried on deck. The article is short, and some of the comments are quite interesting. Given the difficulty accessing it due to the Russian language, I'll leave it here.



Equally interesting to me was the information in the comments about two Mistral-class landing ships being built by the Russians in Kerch, Crimea. They've been under construction for so long that I'd even forgotten about them. It's unclear which of the four navies they're building them for.
 
Last edited:

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,374
Reactions
103 15,238
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Equally interesting to me was the information in the comments about two Mistral-class landing ships being built by the Russians in Kerch, Crimea. They've been under construction for so long that I'd even forgotten about them. It's unclear which of the four navies they're building them for.
I think "being built" is a rather generous term for those two. I don't think they went more than keel laying. They aren't building anything by themselves and DCNS cooperation ended a decade ago.
 

Pokemonte13

Well-known member
Messages
328
Reactions
4 394
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Equally interesting to me was the information in the comments about two Mistral-class landing ships being built by the Russians in Kerch, Crimea. They've been under construction for so long that I'd even forgotten about them. It's unclear which of the four navies they're building them for.
what landing ships? France didn't export them after 2014. The russian have an domestic program ongoing since 2021 but i don't know what has come of it
 

Sanchez

Experienced member
Moderator
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
3,374
Reactions
103 15,238
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
what landing ships? France didn't export them after 2014. The russian have an domestic program ongoing since 2021 but i don't know what has come of it
Under the deal, 2 would be built in France and other 2 would be built in Russia with French support.
 

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
780
Reactions
14 2,044
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
what landing ships? France didn't export them after 2014. The russian have an domestic program ongoing since 2021 but i don't know what has come of it
After the unsuccessful five-day war in South Ossetia (Georgia), the Russians apparently decided that attacking Georgia via the Black Sea would be much easier than transporting troops through the Caucasus passes. Therefore, they ordered two Mistral-class landing ships from France for $1.2 billion. The contract allegedly included the transfer of French technology for localization. When the ships were ready (2015), due to US objections related to the annexation of Crimea, Paris was forced to refuse the Russian order, remove the Russian crew from the ships, and refund the money. The Russians decided to build these helicopter carriers themselves. They are building them in Ukrainian Crimea. After the sinking of the cruiser Moskva, the Ukrainians announced that they would sink the ships any day now, but are waiting for the Russians to complete their construction.

1758816629051.png
 

Strong AI

Experienced member
Messages
2,309
Reactions
53 7,540
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Barrack, the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, who attended the meeting between President Erdoğan and U.S. President Trump, joined CNN TÜRK live broadcast after the meeting. Barrack said, "The meeting was epic, in one word. There will be movement in the integration of the SDF. I said the F-35 issue would be resolved by the end of the year. I won't be wrong."

Tom Barrack's statements were as follows:


"There are important issues, and the whole world is trying to find its way right now. It's very important to speak with both sides on such critical matters, and we are proud of all the parties involved here."

Yunus Paksoy: "I asked the president two questions—one about the F-35s and one about Syria. Do you have any predictions you can share with us regarding potential developments in the near future? They have just emerged from a historic civil war—how long will this transformation process take?"

"Turkey is very persistent and enthusiastic about looking to the future. President Trump also mentioned this. Turkey has a very big role here. The fact that President Trump was convinced to lift sanctions on the Sara regime was a big deal. They received a lot of help here. Turkey played a major role. We will see baby steps; we want to move faster. They need a constitution, they need resources. They need to get rid of the YPG. The rights of Christians there must be protected. They're trying to do everything at once, but today, one of the most important points is the significance of Syria for both countries. We want the Assad regime to listen to its neighbors. I think everyone is on the right path."

Yunus Paksoy: "In June, you said the F-35 issue could be resolved by the end of the year. Foreign ministers had said they could make this happen. Is this the direction things are heading?"

"I’ll leave the answer to that question to others, but I wouldn’t say you're very wrong. You'll hear news from this meeting very soon."

 
Last edited:

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
5,830
Reactions
14,577
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Barrack, the U.S. Ambassador to Turkey, who attended the meeting between President Erdoğan and U.S. President Trump, joined CNN TÜRK live broadcast after the meeting. Barrack said, "The meeting was epic, in one word. There will be movement in the integration of the SDF. I said the F-35 issue would be resolved by the end of the year. I won't be wrong."

Tom Barrack's statements were as follows:


"There are important issues, and the whole world is trying to find its way right now. It's very important to speak with both sides on such critical matters, and we are proud of all the parties involved here."

Yunus Paksoy: "I asked the president two questions—one about the F-35s and one about Syria. Do you have any predictions you can share with us regarding potential developments in the near future? They have just emerged from a historic civil war—how long will this transformation process take?"

"Turkey is very persistent and enthusiastic about looking to the future. President Trump also mentioned this. Turkey has a very big role here. The fact that President Trump was convinced to lift sanctions on the Assad regime was a big deal. They received a lot of help here. Turkey played a major role. We will see baby steps; we want to move faster. They need a constitution, they need resources. They need to get rid of the YPG. The rights of Christians there must be protected. They're trying to do everything at once, but today, one of the most important points is the significance of Syria for both countries. We want the Assad regime to listen to its neighbors. I think everyone is on the right path."

Yunus Paksoy: "In June, you said the F-35 issue could be resolved by the end of the year. Foreign ministers had said they could make this happen. Is this the direction things are heading?"

"I’ll leave the answer to that question to others, but I wouldn’t say you're very wrong. You'll hear news from this meeting very soon."

So,nothing concrete.
 

Follow us on social media

Latest posts

Top Bottom