Latest Thread
Yesterday, the Hürjet was once again announced from the highest authority that a combat version will be developed and that this development will be a naval variant suitable for an aircraft carrier. In the light of this announcement, if we look again at the planes that were crudely compared above: The T/FA-50 system, which carries the same engine as the Hürjet and has a design philosophy very close to the Hürjet, lags behind the GE-F414 and Klimov RD-93's aircrafts in terms of climb capability and power-to-weight ratio due to engine limitations. As far as I know, Gripen E/F is the only one of these aircraft that can technically be operated as a STOBAR on the aircraft carrier, although it has not been proven yet. If I am not mistaken, the new Tejas will also have this capability in the future.
I assume that the landing gear of the Hürjet will probably be revised and the weight increase will be offset by structural lightening. It is not possible to know whether a single-seat variant of the aircraft is being considered by shrinking the canopy without changing the main fuselage, but in any case, the focus should be on increasing the total power output rather than lightening the aircraft.
45k feet I hope we’ll reach even greater heights
And it also meens we're slowly reaching the end of test proccess.AFAIK 45k feet is the service ceiling of Hürjet, that means over that altitude its sustained climb rate is only 100ft/min.
Great achievement from TAI!
Well, they better start aligning themselves with our geopolitical goals then, as @dBSPL said. No fucking way that much business should be done with someone that is opposing us in the Eastern Med.Egypt is interested in Hürjet, UAVs, OPVs/corvettes from ASFAT, modernization of armored vehicles. Egypt is also interested in Kaan.
I think we shouldn't take partners in our projects except maybe Azerbaijan. We can offer them a similar model as how US did with us in F-16 production. They get to produce some uncritical parts themselves, learn to maintain the planes, we get to have full sovereignty over our plane, don't have to negotiate with anyone on any issue.Egypt wants to participate in the production of Hürjet. I think it can be a profitable business model for both sides. However, we need to create full unity on the issues that need a political solution, especially the EEZ issue and full reconciliation in Libya, and I personally do not agree with any industrial capability transfer before that. If there is going to be stalling on strategic issues, TAI's proposal in this tender should not include any industrial cooperation model that would provide any technical advantage over KAI. There is a huge market for the Hürjet, and over the next 20 years, more than 50 air forces, large and small, will renew their training jet fleets or consider the purchase of light attack jets. The current structure in Egypt had previously come to power through a military coup and threw away billions of dollars worth of defense and energy partnerships, including the ANKA program. I have always supported good relations with Egypt. Rapprochement between the two countries limits foreign interference in the region and serves the well-being and national interests of the people of both countries. But the routes and priorities along which this must proceed are clear.
I think we shouldn't take partners in our projects except maybe Azerbaijan. We can offer them a similar model as how US did with us in F-16 production. They get to produce some uncritical parts themselves, learn to maintain the planes, we get to have full sovereignty over our plane, don't have to negotiate with anyone on any issue.