It is not all about money, but more important is capability of the human resource to do right thing with limited resource and how they perceived their threat perception against the mother country. There is several example on how countries with more limited resource compared to Indonesia or predecessor of Indonesia (Netherland Dutch Indies) but eventually emerge as a big winner and able to develop Arms and bread at the same time along with all of the infrastructure needed.
Japan post Meiji era and South Korea after Korean War is a nice example, then the rising of Vietnam lately, those countries actually had manage their high Rates economy growth but still building decent or even formidable military posture compared to the size of their economy and resource. PRC and USA is actually the same, both keep maintain rising military expenditure but actually their economy keep growing at decent Pace (especially US pre Covid19 era during early years of Trump admin, the increase in military spending is side by side with decent economy growth far outweight their peer European allies who insisted to slashing military expenditure).
Indonesia had around 2100 T spending budget, but only put around 125 to 140 T for military spending. https://setkab.go.id/address-of-the...ar-and-its-financial-note-before-the-plena-2/
And such spending is mostly spent for maintenance and operational duty of organization not much for development, research and acquisition program in which actually in dire need. When the budget pie is already small compared to the overall situation of Indonesia macro economy this is questionable how much impact of local Defense industry toward Indonesia economy. Not to mention questionable tradition on several SOE to do tempel stiker business model.
With regard to Air Force theme of this thread, just like i said before without bigger market, bigger client with bigger Air Force fighter fleets, there is almost Nil incentive for our local Defense industry to have more thorough solution toward aviation industry and market especially about fighter.
Japan post Meiji era and South Korea after Korean War is a nice example, then the rising of Vietnam lately, those countries actually had manage their high Rates economy growth but still building decent or even formidable military posture compared to the size of their economy and resource. PRC and USA is actually the same, both keep maintain rising military expenditure but actually their economy keep growing at decent Pace (especially US pre Covid19 era during early years of Trump admin, the increase in military spending is side by side with decent economy growth far outweight their peer European allies who insisted to slashing military expenditure).
Indonesia had around 2100 T spending budget, but only put around 125 to 140 T for military spending. https://setkab.go.id/address-of-the...ar-and-its-financial-note-before-the-plena-2/
And such spending is mostly spent for maintenance and operational duty of organization not much for development, research and acquisition program in which actually in dire need. When the budget pie is already small compared to the overall situation of Indonesia macro economy this is questionable how much impact of local Defense industry toward Indonesia economy. Not to mention questionable tradition on several SOE to do tempel stiker business model.
With regard to Air Force theme of this thread, just like i said before without bigger market, bigger client with bigger Air Force fighter fleets, there is almost Nil incentive for our local Defense industry to have more thorough solution toward aviation industry and market especially about fighter.