Latest Thread
would u mind to share the linkI count for 4 media she said that
There some new her comment on yt or helmi yahya podcast for latestwould u mind to share the link
fun fact : Su 35 hasn't such PGM nor Targeting pod as eco friendly F16 block 52
So fastThey start to send pilots to French
This baffled me somehow. While I must admit that I was once caught in the hype regarding Sukhoi fighters - I mean, who wouldn't if you have feel the roar of its twin engine reverberating in your chest firsthand? - but if modern Western fighters equipped with targeting pods are capable to toss a bomb 'straight through the eye of a needle' on the ground from high altitude, figuratively speaking, Russian approach seems to prefer raw destructive power over accuracy.fun fact : Su 35 hasn't such PGM nor Targeting pod as eco friendly F16 block 52
French Fighter is completely new for us, there are much more to learn I guessSo fast
I just hope that our pilots won't have to learn French to communicate with Rafale's voice command.French Fighter is completely new for us, there are much more to learn I guess
Exocet and scalp?
A lot of reports on Russian bomb inaccuracy. Honestly, I think the Russian cannot even hope to hit a tank accurately with their fighters' bombs, as even their attempt at neutralizing airstrips was ineffective. This capability, of being able to deliver bombs accurately, is often looked over, yet massively crucial for modern air support doctrine. If Russian fighters are unable to perform even that effectively, then they cannot be used to support ground operation, hence it isn't a proper "multirole" aircraft and is nearly obsolete. This is a stark contrast to the lesson taken from US Operation Desert Storm against Iraq, as PGMs then carried the day, and US fighter-bombers have proven to have more use for accurate bombs, than a large mass of dumb bombs.This baffled me somehow. While I must admit that I was once caught in the hype regarding Sukhoi fighters - I mean, who wouldn't if you have feel the roar of its twin engine reverberating in your chest firsthand? - but if modern Western fighters equipped with targeting pods are capable to toss a bomb 'straight through the eye of a needle' on the ground from high altitude, figuratively speaking, Russian approach seems to prefer raw destructive power over accuracy.
This is by no mean I'm insinuating that Russian don't have PGMs for those Sukhoi fighters on their own. It's just that what I've seen from the results of Russian bombardment in a Ukrainian airport stand in contrast to what they've shown us when they were fighting in Syria.
Anyway, all things considered, I'm just glad that we somehow "dodged a bullet" by cancelling Su-35 acquisition.
True that, and I hope that TNI-AU is also aiming to have more PGMs and how to utilize them more effectively. In today's battlefield, we can no longer depend on "carpet bombing the hell out of the enemy" especially if said enemy possess their own air defense measures.A lot of reports on Russian bomb inaccuracy. Honestly, I think the Russian cannot even hope to hit a tank accurately with their fighters' bombs, as even their attempt at neutralizing airstrips was ineffective. This capability, of being able to deliver bombs accurately, is often looked over, yet massively crucial for modern air support doctrine. If Russian fighters are unable to perform even that effectively, then they cannot be used to support ground operation, hence it isn't a proper "multirole" aircraft and is nearly obsolete. This is a stark contrast to the lesson taken from US Operation Desert Storm against Iraq, as PGMs then carried the day, and US fighter-bombers have proven to have more use for accurate bombs, than a large mass of dumb bombs.
PGMs and other guided munitions allow for very effective neutralization of ground vehicles, hence fighters employing them are truly "multirole", and could effectively support ground operation, in contrast to what the Russian operation is showing to us now.
Meanwhile, apparently Sari Bahari bombs are literally copies of those used by RussiaTrue that, and I hope that TNI-AU is also aiming to have more PGMs and how to utilize them more effectively. In today's battlefield, we can no longer depend on "carpet bombing the hell out of the enemy" especially if said enemy possess their own air defense measures.
Bold: not only that, but also to minimize unnecessary collateral damage as much as possible. It's one thing if the enemy is out in the open, but if they're already entering one of our towns or cities, it is imperative for us to have the capability to shove a bomb directly on their throats only.
Meanwhile, apparently Sari Bahari bombs are literally copies of those used by Russia
View attachment 40556
Do they look familiar?
So these are definitely dumb bombs, and I cannot see the possibility of installing guidance kit on them. Unless we are going to do saturation bombing on cities, these bombs are of little use. Especially since our objective as an island nation is to repel invasions, meaning targeting troops, city leveling capability will have no use.
Instead we need to adopt these en masse:
View attachment 40558
We need A LOT of JDAMs and GBUs, and so we need to standardize this:
View attachment 40559
Idk the name of the bomb, anyone can name them? anyway we should use them as our main bomb and install JDAM kits on them. Having GBUs and cruise missiles will also helps a lot, but for now having JDAMs is more urgent.
As far as I know, the dumb bomb is made of 3 parts: The front (which contains fuse), the body (contains warhead), and the tail. They are detachable. So in order to make smart bomb, the front and the tail part must be swapped with ones with guidance and electronics. So it is possible that Russian-style bomb is made to be a smart bomb.
But here is a thing: Sari Bahari can also make NATO-standard bomb. Theoretically we can buy the guidance kit from foreign supplier and attach them to our bombs. This would be easier to NATO bombs because what's available is made specifically for NATO (or USA) bombs.
They're fine for a start. But you know how dumb bombs like those are being 'blown up' - pun intended - in our media like they're the best thing ever since nasi goreng, right?Meanwhile, apparently Sari Bahari bombs are literally copies of those used by Russia
Do they look familiar?
So these are definitely dumb bombs, and I cannot see the possibility of installing guidance kit on them. Unless we are going to do saturation bombing on cities, these bombs are of little use. Especially since our objective as an island nation is to repel invasions, meaning targeting troops, city leveling capability will have no use.
Oh yes, I agree. That's why I've repeatedly suggested for us to start with something small first. Like a license to produce guidance kit for 70 mm rockets, for example. Turkey's Cirit is one fine example of that.Instead we need to adopt these en masse:
Idk the name of the bomb, anyone can name them? anyway we should use them as our main bomb and install JDAM kits on them. Having GBUs and cruise missiles will also helps a lot, but for now having JDAMs is more urgent.
Yep, escpecially if we interested their Anka UAVurkey's Cirit is one fine example of that.
How do ANKA compare to Bayraktar? Also wasn't Andika interested in MQ-1C?Yep, escpecially if we interested their Anka UAV