Indonesia Indonesian Air Force, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Udara (TNI-AU)

Lordimperator

Experienced member
Moderator
Indonesia Correspondent
Indonesia Moderator
Messages
4,997
Reactions
3 2,852
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Rafale and Mirage are basically the same class from French. So they could search for heavy fighter from the same country which is Eagle too.
F15 reduced to 8/12, add more F16?
 

Gary

Experienced member
Messages
8,361
Reactions
22 12,853
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
1. Preparing IAF to get Rafale, might be this is somenkind of deal with French too.
1.Preparing Mirage for Rafale ? I can' see the correlation on prepping on two very different platform
2. Deal with the French buy buying Middle Eastern bird ? again I fail to see the point

Maybe lobbies from French and MEA nations, which they are trying to get rid off their mirage fleet.
 

Umigami

Experienced member
Moderator
Indonesia Moderator
Messages
6,419
Reactions
5 5,232
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Let's put this Mirage where the adversary aren't that serious. Biak maybe?
 

NEKO

Experienced member
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
3,168
Reactions
3 2,795
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Is there a plan to get more than 14 unit in the future?
 

FPXAllen

Contributor
Indonesia Correspondent
Messages
1,126
Reactions
4 1,702
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
Let's put this Mirage where the adversary aren't that serious. Biak maybe?
As much as I wish this is true, a modern air force should not be built based upon this thinking - especially so for a nation like Indonesia.

To put it simply, with our geographical situation combined with our foreign policy, our potential threats are coming from all directions. Thus, if we base our "weaker" squadrons at some places where we think the "lesser threats" are, a capable enemy nation will always be able to find ways to exploit this, either by using carrier strike groups, long-range strategic bombing or missile strikes, exhausting our more advanced combat aircrafts and destroying their bases first, or by some other options.

If this plan goes through, I can only say that we're going to shoot our own foot in the long run. Furthermore, this will add more burden and complication to the already overcomplicated and overburdened air force's logistics for, what? A mere squadron of 20-30-year old combat jets?
 
Last edited:

RadenSudirman

Well-known member
Messages
341
Reactions
288
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
I have always said from the very beginning, Kemenkeu is too powerful and that is bad

Imagine having a wallet that can talk back against you, and control your own money, that's basically Kemenkeu

Their paradigm is purely economic-financial, not defense. If you think like hammer everything will look like a nail to you, that is basically how they think. Kemenkeu sees everything as financial problem and nothing else. Defense is not first about consideration of the economy, but national security. If one sacrifice capability for the sake of saving some money that is legit dumb.

When you are hospitalized and are on medication, you do not intentionally cut your own healthcare budget midway, which means fewer drugs and less treatment, for the sake of "saving budget". Because the whole point of you getting treated in hospital, to begin with, is to get healthy (creating robust defense capability), not to save money (whatever kemenkeu is doing), cost is just a secondary consideration to that purpose, because otherwise if you are not healthy, you will die.
 

kantokuukai

Active member
Messages
54
Reactions
15
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
I have always said from the very beginning, Kemenkeu is too powerful and that is bad

Imagine having a wallet that can talk back against you, and control your own money, that's basically Kemenkeu

Their paradigm is purely economic-financial, not defense. If you think like hammer everything will look like a nail to you, that is basically how they think. Kemenkeu sees everything as financial problem and nothing else. Defense is not first about consideration of the economy, but national security. If one sacrifice capability for the sake of saving some money that is legit dumb.

When you are hospitalized and are on medication, you do not intentionally cut your own healthcare budget midway, which means fewer drugs and less treatment, for the sake of "saving budget". Because the whole point of you getting treated in hospital, to begin with, is to get healthy (creating robust defense capability), not to save money (whatever kemenkeu is doing), cost is just a secondary consideration to that purpose, because otherwise if you are not healthy, you will die.
It makes sense that if you have a limited budget while the list of activities to be funded is very large, then the super-priority activities are selected. It's different when the state of war or other things that force it may be a super-priority choice for self-defense.
To become a priority, the role of the ministry/institution is to provide a convincing explanation regarding activities in their environment. It also includes how planning, managing the implementation of activities, and accountability must also be clear, transparent, and accountable. If it turns out that they were not chosen to receive funding, it is worth asking whether the activity is a super-priority or not?
 
Top Bottom