hmm quite dissapointed, I thought it will be brand newMaybe Pohang class
Latest Thread
hmm quite dissapointed, I thought it will be brand newMaybe Pohang class
hmm quite dissapointed, I thought it will be brand new
Please be followed by Sejong the GreatMaybe Pohang class
MBDA NCM? Tomahawk?
Did someone see or save the MoD deleted twitter?
"Japanese Director Naval Chief
Design and ATLA ...."
no but they did print a brochure for thatYes,
Did they bring suryo mokit?
How they place that paper was kind of funny. It was like they were expecting it to be leaked on internet.
They need a bigger table to, look how they placed the box preventing the brochure slides away, while not blocking the beauties mogami.How they place that paper was kind of funny. It was like they were expecting it to be leaked on internet.
Just like that one time with American UAV.How they place that paper was kind of funny. It was like they were expecting it to be leaked on internet.
automation can also lead to ship having more operation/patrol endurance, since you can have double amount of supply stock while cutting half of the crew personnel needed to manned the ship.Regarding our interest to acquire Japan-made naval combatant, I can't help but wonder whether the concept of "big ship, minimum crews" like what the Japanese took when designing and building Mogami-class frigate will also become something that we're interested in and going to follow for our own future ship projects.
Japan surely has a more compelling reason why they want their ships to have a much higher degree of automation even though it will mean that their price will be a lot more expensive. Compared to that, our ships - even the newest ones - are still much more dependant on human crews since we don't really have a shortage of people who want to serve in the Navy, and in other branches of the TNI for that matter.
So in case that we're interested to adopt Japan's approach in designing Mogami-class frigates to apply it into our own naval combatant projects, we can built and launch even more warships with the same amount of available menpower to crew those ships.
For example, while the current complement for each of our Sampari-class 60-meters FAC is about 43 personnel - or about 258 for all six of them, by halving that amount to around 21 with a comprehensive automation, there's a potential for us to build six-more of those Sampari-class without even have to worry to find nore personnel to crew those boats.
Thoughts?
Regarding our interest to acquire Japan-made naval combatant, I can't help but wonder whether the concept of "big ship, minimum crews" like what the Japanese took when designing and building Mogami-class frigate will also become something that we're interested in and going to follow for our own future ship projects.
Japan surely has a more compelling reason why they want their ships to have a much higher degree of automation even though it will mean that their price will be a lot more expensive. Compared to that, our ships - even the newest ones - are still much more dependant on human crews since we don't really have a shortage of people who want to serve in the Navy, and in other branches of the TNI for that matter.
So in case that we're interested to adopt Japan's approach in designing Mogami-class frigates to apply it into our own naval combatant projects, we can built and launch even more warships with the same amount of available menpower to crew those ships.
For example, while the current complement for each of our Sampari-class 60-meters FAC is about 43 personnel - or about 258 for all six of them, by halving that amount to around 21 with a comprehensive automation, there's a potential for us to build six-more of those Sampari-class without even have to worry to find nore personnel to crew those boats.
Thoughts?
Higher automation means there is the need of higher level of profesional technician onboard, highly computerized system prone to fail in domino compared to the mechanical one, we need to increase the capability of our human resources, not only onboard the ship, but also the other technician working on the shore.Regarding our interest to acquire Japan-made naval combatant, I can't help but wonder whether the concept of "big ship, minimum crews" like what the Japanese took when designing and building Mogami-class frigate will also become something that we're interested in and going to follow for our own future ship projects.
Japan surely has a more compelling reason why they want their ships to have a much higher degree of automation even though it will mean that their price will be a lot more expensive. Compared to that, our ships - even the newest ones - are still much more dependant on human crews since we don't really have a shortage of people who want to serve in the Navy, and in other branches of the TNI for that matter.
So in case that we're interested to adopt Japan's approach in designing Mogami-class frigates to apply it into our own naval combatant projects, we can built and launch even more warships with the same amount of available menpower to crew those ships.
For example, while the current complement for each of our Sampari-class 60-meters FAC is about 43 personnel - or about 258 for all six of them, by halving that amount to around 21 with a comprehensive automation, there's a potential for us to build six-more of those Sampari-class without even have to worry to find nore personnel to crew those boats.
Thoughts?
Higher automation means there is the need of higher level of profesional technician onboard, highly computerized system prone to fail in domino compared to the mechanical one, we need to increase the capability of our human resources, not only onboard the ship, but also the other technician working on the shore.
Higher automation means there is the need of higher level of profesional technician onboard, highly computerized system prone to fail in domino compared to the mechanical one, we need to increase the capability of our human resources, not only onboard the ship, but also the other technician working on the shore.
That's the way forward, of course. I'm glad that we already realize that eventhough we have much more human resources compared to Japan, but a highly educated, professional technician/crew can do much more if they're equipped with the right tool to do their jobs.That's why MoD created several polytechnic college, affiliate school , grant scholarship toward armed Forces member in engineering, technic and so on and giving attention toward Defense university.
Ah yes, this, of course, is another benefit of having a smaller number of crews since automation can take over the works of many others.automation can also lead to ship having more operation/patrol endurance, since you can have double amount of supply stock while cutting half of the crew personnel needed to manned the ship.
Higher automation means there is the need of higher level of profesional technician onboard, highly computerized system prone to fail in domino compared to the mechanical one, we need to increase the capability of our human resources, not only onboard the ship, but also the other technician working on the shore.