Indonesia Indonesian Navy, Tentara Nasional Indonesia-Angkatan Laut (TNI-AL)

Madokafc

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
5,903
Reactions
4 10,020
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
If we are talking about offensive ops on a very big land masses, our marines will only stick close to the shore lines and let the army to push deeper inland? Or will they work together with the army units.

Btw do we need facility to build ship indoor somewhere in the future? With/without dry dock.

images
images


Current PAL submarine facility also can be used to build something around KCR60 size, do we need bigger facility?
If the "imaginary" assault ops let our Marines units goes deep into enemy hinterland all the way from the shore, that's only mean their Air Force is no more a threat
 

Madokafc

Experienced member
Think Tank Analyst
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
5,903
Reactions
4 10,020
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
If we are talking about offensive ops on a very big land masses, our marines will only stick close to the shore lines and let the army to push deeper inland? Or will they work together with the army units.

Btw do we need facility to build ship indoor somewhere in the future? With/without dry dock.

images
images


Current PAL submarine facility also can be used to build something around KCR60 size, do we need bigger facility?

Don't know with our Indhan future planning, but China usually build and assembly their Frigates or Destroyer outdoor
 

Chestnut

Active member
Professional
Messages
109
Reactions
166
Can't speak for biho but korkut has it


ACV-30 hull made by FNSS so pindad can be contracted to produce it like kaplan mt. Choice is easy no need to look further...
I feel like they could just save a lot more money by putting a Rheinmetall Skyranger on a Kaplan MT or Pandur II chassis.


A Rheinmetall Skyranger 35 would legit just be easier to procure and maintain for the Navy since it uses the same parts and ammo as the CIWS on their ships.
 
Last edited:

this is crunch

Contributor
Messages
657
Reactions
4 633
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
I feel like they could just save a lot more money by putting a Rheinmetall Skyranger on a Kaplan MT or Pandur II chassis.


A Rheinmetall Skyranger 35 would legit just be easier to procure and maintain for the Navy since it uses the same parts and ammo as the CIWS on their ships.
EEEY GOOD TO SEE YOU BACK HERE SIR @Chestnut, its been a long time..

yup only if other matra want to use the same equipment, but i think Turkish Korkut is also a good option, since Korkut and Rheinmetall Skyshield share the same calibre
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,189
Solutions
2
Reactions
100 23,174
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
EEEY GOOD TO SEE YOU BACK HERE SIR @Chestnut, its been a long time..

yup only if other matra want to use the same equipment, but i think Turkish Korkut is also a good option, since Korkut and Rheinmetall Skyshield share the same calibre
Korkut can be built using the existing GDF cannons, also one-one to replaceable spare parts makes it easy to maintain :). I really doubt if the skyranger can, also it seems Indonesia is not big fan of the GDF thus makes skyranger more attractable.
Plus there has been hints of a newer Korkut with single barrel, 40mm and longer range but it hasn't been unveiled yet maybe they have chosen to streamline the turret using the feedbacks from Gökdeniz.
I feel like they could just save a lot more money by putting a Rheinmetall Skyranger on a Kaplan MT or Pandur II chassis.


A Rheinmetall Skyranger 35 would legit just be easier to procure and maintain for the Navy since it uses the same parts and ammo as the CIWS on their ships.
Navy operates only two millenium gun if i am not mistaken. Could be wise only for the training, but for maintenance it doesn't make sense to fit it onto two.
What matters most is the CIWS on FREMM / Arrowhead / Mogami, if they are common; better if they choose their manufacturer as the supplier of the project.
+ Kaplan MT is an expensive hull, plus it has got the engine on back thus Kaplan NG is needed here.
 

Chestnut

Active member
Professional
Messages
109
Reactions
166
Korkut can be built using the existing GDF cannons, also one-one to replaceable spare parts makes it easy to maintain :). I really doubt if the skyranger can, also it seems Indonesia is not big fan of the GDF thus makes skyranger more attractable.
Plus there has been hints of a newer Korkut with single barrel, 40mm and longer range but it hasn't been unveiled yet maybe they have chosen to streamline the turret using the feedbacks from Gökdeniz.

Navy operates only two millenium gun if i am not mistaken. Could be wise only for the training, but for maintenance it doesn't make sense to fit it onto two.
What matters most is the CIWS on FREMM / Arrowhead / Mogami, if they are common; better if they choose their manufacturer as the supplier of the project.
+ Kaplan MT is an expensive hull, plus it has got the engine on back thus Kaplan NG is needed here.
No but the Air Force also operates the millennium gun as point defense guns as well. It would make a lot more sense to have something like the Skyranger 35 and mate it onto an existing platform that Pindad can already produce itself. Much like Gepard or the Type 009 SPAAG.
 

kooppyyy

Active member
Messages
95
Reactions
118
Nation of residence
Indonesia
Nation of origin
Indonesia
the F with using GFP as reference? stupid as stupid goes
IMO the way I see it this could represent a deeper organizational problem, which I hope not. Why are we using GFP as a metric? Do we not have our own dimension to measure our capability? It looks as if the policymakers are so keen to get into the dick-measuring contest tbh
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom