Is the US or China the world’s economic superpower?
TBS Report
01 October, 2021, 02:40 pm
TBS Report
01 October, 2021, 02:40 pm
Is the US or China the world’s economic superpower?
www.tbsnews.net
Latest Thread
If only you find out how many highways, HSR, subways,bridges, ports , airports, hospitals, schools...China builds everyday, China is literally changing the face of this planet, China exports a lot , but the precentage in China's GDP is very small, and gets smaller every passing year.China's GDP is "man-made," unreliable: top leader
China's GDP figures are "man-made" and therefore unreliable, the man who is expected to be the country's next head of government said in 2007, according to U.S. diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks.www.reuters.com
It's funny when spammer uses China GDP as any kind of denominator.
It is common knowledge China economy is very export-reliant.. whatever the "%" by some GDP-inflation works out to be.
It's not a analogue. Germany was only marginally larger then Britain but despite that it would defeated Britain easily. The problem for the Germans was the British not only made a alliance with various powers in Europe in a manner that Germany was locked in. The geograpy of Germany being aas it was sandwiched inbetween Western and Eastern Europe with sealanes all running through the noose adjacent to British coast mean't Germany was locked in. In addition USA joined in placing Germany at hopeless odds.Germany’s rivalry with Britain in the late 19th and early 20th centuries
CN unemployment rate should be around 25 to 30% now when most of employee will be fired after 35.China's GDP is "man-made," unreliable: top leader
China's GDP figures are "man-made" and therefore unreliable, the man who is expected to be the country's next head of government said in 2007, according to U.S. diplomatic cables released by WikiLeaks.www.reuters.com
It's funny when spammer uses China GDP as any kind of denominator.
It is common knowledge China economy is very export-reliant.. whatever the "%" by some GDP-inflation works out to be.
We also see lots of houses built by Evergrande...and they are Ghost building nowIf only you find out how many highways, HSR, subways,bridges, ports , airports, hospitals, schools...China builds everyday, China is literally changing the face of this planet, China exports a lot , but the precentage in China's GDP is very small, and gets smaller every passing year.
It's not a analogue. Germany was only marginally larger then Britain but despite that it would defeated Britain easily.
The problem for the Germans was the British not only made a alliance with various powers in Europe in a manner that Germany was locked in. The geograpy of Germany being aas it was sandwiched inbetween Western and Eastern Europe with sealanes all running through the noose adjacent to British coast mean't Germany was locked in. In addition USA joined in placing Germany at hopeless odds.
With China it's other way around. It is actually far larger than USA and has the depth and pool to take on USA. Even if you throw in Allies China still has numbers to balance the equation.
True, so many CNese are jobless or earning merely 60 yuan (9usd ) per day. Of course many more become jobless after Evergrade collapse plus many CN thermal power plants closed due to losing profit.The US is not interested in invading mainland China, their goals is to destroy and incapacitate the PLAN , humiliate Chinese leadership and let angry Chinese populace to do the rest.
In mock war with China, US lost every single of them. their generals are so worried about conflicts with China and they even made phone calls skipping the consent from US president, China's anti ship missile system now is argubly the best in the world, if US had a sea battle with China in the waters close to China, it'll be a guaranteed defeat for US.as I mentioned before, China could grow their armies to whatever level they want, 10 million 20 million, they know they would not have enough ships to bring them to the likely frontline with the US. The US is not interested in invading mainland China, their goals is to destroy and incapacitate the PLAN , humiliate Chinese leadership and let angry Chinese populace to do the rest.
In mock war with China, US lost every single of them.
their generals are so worried about conflicts with China and they even made phone calls skipping the consent from US president,
China's anti ship missile system now is argubly the best in the world,
see this ??if US had a sea battle with China in the waters close to China, it'll be a guaranteed defeat for US.
It's very plausible that US can't win close to Chinese waters, even in mock war, they won everyone a decade ago, but now , they started to lose, see the change of balance?this sounds scary until you realized that the US intentionally rigged their own military exercise. The red team simulating China in those exercise are Americans, and Chinese are not in the same league as their American counterparts
Sentiments are not same as real military professional assessments, US public worried about nuclear war with Russia during the cold war, they didn't worry about losing a sea war. besides, if US and Russia had a land war in Europe back then, till now people still believe US wouldn't have a better chance to win.during the cold war there are real sentiments that the US military would be overtaken and defeated by the Soviet military, only in the end we knew that those are hyped up to convince congress to increase military spending.
It's very plausible that US can't win close to Chinese waters, even in mock war, they won everyone a decade ago, but now , they started to lose, see the change of balance?
Ships are sitting ducks if they are within the range of landbase anti ship missiles, saturation attack will give them very little survival chance.see this ??
here's a military professional giving assessment about China.Sentiments are not same as real military professional assessments, US public worried about nuclear war with Russia during the cold war, they didn't worry about losing a sea war. besides, if US and Russia had a land war in Europe back then, till now people still believe US wouldn't have a better chance to win.
correct and how are you going to find those ships in the vast ocean and not mistaken them for a tanker ???Ships are sitting ducks if they are within the range of landbase anti ship missiles, saturation attack will give them very little survival chance.
They can try, when they invaded other countries, they also believed they can win, even in Korean war, they believed Chinese troops were just pushover in the beginning.You seems to accept everything the US military intentionally reveal about those exercise as gospel,
now would you accept this too ??
The US military has all the necessary capabilities to defeat China in case of a military invasion of Taiwan and if a respective political decision is made, Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley said during a congressional hearing on Thursday.
US Fully Capable Of Defeating China If Beijing Dares Invading Taiwan - Top Commander
US military has all the necessary capabilities to defeat China in case of a military invasion of Taiwan Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley saideurasiantimes.com
If they sail close to Chinese waters, now the satelite technology can pinpoint a car on the ground, let alone a ship.here's a military professional giving assessment about China.
"“My assessment, in terms of capability, I think China has a ways to go to develop the actual, no-kidding capability to conduct military operations to seize through military means the entire island of Taiwan, if they wanted to do that," Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff Gen. Mark Milley told the Senate Appropriations Committee.
Top US general: Chinese military has 'ways to go' before it can take Taiwan
The Chinese military does not currently have the capability to take Taiwan by force and is not likely to try in the near term, the U.S. military’s top general said Thursday.thehill.com
correct and how are you going to find those ships in the vast ocean and not mistaken them for a tanker ???
you don't think much aren't you ??
ahh here's comes Korea, the only military achievement you could be proud of. which is 70+ years ago. and basically a stalemate with a huge loss of lives on your side.They can try, when they invaded other countries, they also believed they can win, even in Korean war, they believed Chinese troops were just pushover in the beginning.
If they sail close to Chinese waters, now the satelite technology can pinpoint a car on the ground, let alone a ship.
Course US didn't dare to militarily challenge China ever since, China also took over Paracel islands in SCS from US treaty ally South Vietnam in 1974, and US 7th fleet was just nearby, but they rejected S. Vietnam's urgent request for help, this show how reliable US is as an ally.ahh here's comes Korea, the only military achievement you could be proud of. which is 70+ years ago. and basically a stalemate with a huge loss of lives on your side.
China has so many satelites in the space, and you don't believe your car can't be spotted and your GPS will stop working just because it is right under a satelite, right? China also has numerous under water drones operated in various depths in Chinese waters.ahh here's comes Korea, the only military achievement you could be proud of. which is 70+ years ago. and basically a stalemate with a huge loss of lives on your side.
have you ever thought about institutional memory to back those claims in Korea applicable to the warzone of today ??
Institutional memory - Wikipedia
en.wikipedia.org
yes, and do you know the exact time those satellite stays on top of the said target ?? Satellite move at extremely fast speed in LEO.
By the time you relay those positions back , the ships will be thousands of Km further from the original coordinate.
watch this:
China has so many satelites in the space,
and you don't believe your car can't be spotted and your GPS will stop working just because it is right under a satelite, right? China also has numerous under water drones operated in various depths in Chinese waters.
I said if they sail close to China and exposed themselves to China's world largest landbased anti ship missile network.the same could be said with the US, they has more satellites than yours. what makes you think PLAN ships will be safe ??