Live Conflict Israel-US vs Iran War (2026)

4MikeEcho

New member
Messages
4
Reactions
10
Nation of residence
Argentina
Nation of origin
Tahiti
One thing this President is not capable of predictibility. The GCC arabs promised to invest several $Trillion in the US, and whole set of projects on top of it with his family to accrue benefits . In all respects, i thought this was inducement that Trump and family will capitalize on and not cause any further violence. That plan really fell apart, even to Trump's own detriment for his sons to line up their pockets.

That unpredictibility also applies here to Isreal not knowing how Trump will act. While they pulled him into the conflict, given after all this expenditure of munitions, Pentagon now says only 50% of launchers destroyed, then Trump can go any direction. Its probably an usual place for Israel to be to not count on US next set of actions. Its an unfamiliar area for them
 

4MikeEcho

New member
Messages
4
Reactions
10
Nation of residence
Argentina
Nation of origin
Tahiti
A few pondering points. There is no article or even theories I have surfaced, so I ask here to see what people's ideas are.

There were at least 150+ USAF fighter bombers that need regional air bases. They could not all be operating from Mawaffiq Saiti in Jordan. There must be some dispersion to these to other GCC countries.

1. Were the GCC countries lying when they said they would not allow overflights by US attack aircraft?
2. Was this the reason that each country was being targeted. Not only was there airspace not being used, but also some of their installations. At least in initial stages before the Iranian response
3. Saudi Arabia obviously lied as it had tankers and AWACS: if thats the case, why didn't Iran make it known that these bases were being used?
4. There is NO WAY that GCC was telling the truth in the first few days of the war that it would not allow its airspace. Not using its airspace would mean that attacking aircraft would have a very narrow corridor to come from, making their entry into Iran known across a few locations.
Even aircraft flying from the Abraham Lincoln would have to enter GCC airspace to maintian a level of surprise over Iran (and unpredictable trajectory) for their ingress and egress
5. Why did Iran not make a bigger PR awareness out of it?
6. And given that Iran's attacks penetrated every major installation in GCC countries, then why did they not attack Israeli air bases? Those Israeli air bases would not have more protection than what a THAAD woudl provide .

The only Iran claim of attacking Israeli air installations is from the Oct 24 war I think
 

4MikeEcho

New member
Messages
4
Reactions
10
Nation of residence
Argentina
Nation of origin
Tahiti
Yes,and its dirt poor relying on handouts from the rich GCC countries,US,UK,EU.
GCC without oil and gas revenues= Jordan.
I agree but that does not answer why it has not been the subject of sustained attacks by Iran. It would seem at least as important for Iran to attack that as it was to go after Prince Sultan.
 

Passenger

Well-known member
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
335
Reactions
8 622
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
A few pondering points. There is no article or even theories I have surfaced, so I ask here to see what people's ideas are.

There were at least 150+ USAF fighter bombers that need regional air bases. They could not all be operating from Mawaffiq Saiti in Jordan. There must be some dispersion to these to other GCC countries.

1. Were the GCC countries lying when they said they would not allow overflights by US attack aircraft?
2. Was this the reason that each country was being targeted. Not only was there airspace not being used, but also some of their installations. At least in initial stages before the Iranian response
3. Saudi Arabia obviously lied as it had tankers and AWACS: if thats the case, why didn't Iran make it known that these bases were being used?
4. There is NO WAY that GCC was telling the truth in the first few days of the war that it would not allow its airspace. Not using its airspace would mean that attacking aircraft would have a very narrow corridor to come from, making their entry into Iran known across a few locations.
Even aircraft flying from the Abraham Lincoln would have to enter GCC airspace to maintian a level of surprise over Iran (and unpredictable trajectory) for their ingress and egress
5. Why did Iran not make a bigger PR awareness out of it?
6. And given that Iran's attacks penetrated every major installation in GCC countries, then why did they not attack Israeli air bases? Those Israeli air bases would not have more protection than what a THAAD woudl provide .

The only Iran claim of attacking Israeli air installations is from the Oct 24 war I think
Q1: Yes, In fact, the GCC Airzone is belong to US/Isreal(Under CENTCOM control).
Q2: Yes.
Q3: I think the US military base in GCC is not controled by those GCC none care what they say, including Iran.
Q5: The global media is not owned by Iran, there is such Iran PR in Chinese media, but of course it is impossible to find it in english media.
Q6: Iran is keeping attack Israeli air bases and there were huge damaged, that also the reason US banned satellite photo company for their middle east photo sell.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,527
Reactions
59 21,477
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
The mainstream media and news are still under western control, and as long as people do not vary the source of their information they'll still be painted by the opinion (Selective news) of the governments of the country they are located in.

The only way to try to counter this is by truly having independent and true journalism. Unbiased. But we see what happens to that kind of journalists in Gaza.

Really sad, but True journalists are what our world lacks, and they are our unsung Heroes.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,527
Reactions
59 21,477
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey

Why, of why does this minister of trade open his mouth about this. He should keep it shut and deflect to trade talks.

Let the elephant in the room be, and let some other country remind Trump of what the f.... NATO is about.
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
6,303
Reactions
1 16,030
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey

Why, of why does this minister of trade open his mouth about this. He should keep it shut and deflect to trade talks.

Let the elephant in the room be, and let some other country remind Trump of what the f.... NATO is about.
No worries,he was the last one to say it,all other NATO countries already stated it.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,527
Reactions
59 21,477
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey

People are asking questions to the newspaper live on what NATO can do. if you are interested you could submit a question as well :)
 

MS Sandhu

Member
Messages
18
Reactions
1 36
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan
The mainstream media and news are still under western control, and as long as people do not vary the source of their information they'll still be painted by the opinion (Selective news) of the governments of the country they are located in.

The only way to try to counter this is by truly having independent and true journalism. Unbiased. But we see what happens to that kind of journalists in Gaza.

Really sad, but True journalists are what our world lacks, and they are our unsung Heroes.
Every human has his own biases influenced by patriotism/religion/ethnicity/economic interests,etc. so media houses pushing their own narratives is understandable.
 

MS Sandhu

Member
Messages
18
Reactions
1 36
Nation of residence
Pakistan
Nation of origin
Pakistan
Screenshot_2026-04-10-16-48-42-61_40deb401b9ffe8e1df2f1cc5ba480b12.jpg

11000+ munitions fired in first 16 days of war costing 26 Billion US Dollar to US/Isr/Gulfies.

If we count the combat losses + munitions fired + assets maintenance and combat/transport sorties - the 40 days war has easily costed around 100 Billion US Dollar to US and its allies.

And we are not taking into account the economic damage Iran did to global economy by blocking SoH.
 

Passenger

Well-known member
Moderator
China Moderator
Messages
335
Reactions
8 622
Nation of residence
China
Nation of origin
China
Could you post links
Iranian Embassy in China
The official blog of Iranian Embassy in China's Weibo platform
There also some commentators invited by Iran goverment had traveled to Iran in the past, they make PR for Iran.

US and Isreal do the same things in China, they can paid more. Some media outlets have long praised Jewish countries and denigrated Islamic countries, and the public has become accustomed to this PR and regards it as background noise.
 

TR_123456

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
6,303
Reactions
1 16,030
Nation of residence
Nethelands
Nation of origin
Turkey
Iranian Embassy in China
The official blog of Iranian Embassy in China's Weibo platform
There also some commentators invited by Iran goverment had traveled to Iran in the past, they make PR for Iran.

US and Isreal do the same things in China, they can paid more. Some media outlets have long praised Jewish countries and denigrated Islamic countries, and the public has become accustomed to this PR and regards it as background noise.
They should also know/see the difference between Muslim countries.
Iran is not exactly the best example of Muslim countries as a sectarian theocratic entity.
 

Spitfire9

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,064
Reactions
17 1,426
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
United Kingdom

Why, of why does this minister of trade open his mouth about this. He should keep it shut and deflect to trade talks.

Let the elephant in the room be, and let some other country remind Trump of what the f.... NATO is about.
Quite right, NATO is a defensive military alliance intended to militarily support members under attack. The US is not under attack. Along with Israel it attacked Iran. Iran did not respond by attacking the US. It is entitled to attack US bases.

Iran is not entitled to close non-Iranian waters to sea trade. The US president will have been advised that attacking Iran might provoke this reaction. Now it has, let the US sort it out. If Trump wants help getting the strait re-opened, let him ask Israel, the other aggressor against Iran for help.

The US and Israel's actions have had a very negative effect on the world economy. Let them take responsibility and do something to fix the problem they created.

The days of NATO members attacking countries that the US has chosen to attack are possibly over for good.
 
Last edited:

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
DefenceHub Diplomat
Messages
9,527
Reactions
59 21,477
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
Quite right, NATO is a defensive military alliance intended to militarily support members under attack. The US is not under attack. Along with Israel it attacked Iran. Iran did not respond by attacking the US. It is entitled to attack US bases.

Iran is not entitled to close non-Iranian waters to sea trade. The US president will have been advised that attacking Iran might provoke this reaction. Now it has, let the US sort it out. If Trump wants help getting the strait re-opened, let him ask Israel for help.

The days of US NATO members attacking countries that the US has chosen to attack are possibly over for good.
And someone needs to remind Trump that NATO and other countries has supported US 25 years since 9/11. And look at the result.
 

Perun

Active member
Messages
136
Reactions
2 144
Nation of residence
Croatia
Nation of origin
Croatia
Iranian Embassy in China
The official blog of Iranian Embassy in China's Weibo platform
There also some commentators invited by Iran goverment had traveled to Iran in the past, they make PR for Iran.

US and Isreal do the same things in China, they can paid more. Some media outlets have long praised Jewish countries and denigrated Islamic countries, and the public has become accustomed to this PR and regards it as background noise.
Thanks
 

Iskander

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
1,053
Reactions
20 2,719
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
Farid Isaev.

And the Pope is disillusioned with Trump.

The scandal surrounding a strange conversation between a Vatican representative and Pentagon leadership is taking an unpleasant turn for the White House. It appears that under the current American administration, Pope Leo XIV, Chicago-born Robert Prevost, will not return to his homeland.

On April 6, The Free Press reported that a few days after the Pope's January address, his nuncio, Cardinal Christophe Pierre, was summoned to the Pentagon and, in a closed meeting, lectured the Catholic Church on the need to side with America and stop condemning President Trump's policies. In his speech, Leo XIV condemned the spread of "war fashion" and the popularity of "coercive diplomacy," which Washington interpreted, generally correctly, as criticism of the White House.

Both the harsh criticism directed at the Vatican representative and, through him, the head of the Roman Catholic Church, and the meeting itself, which included high-ranking officials from the Department of War, were unusual. The Pentagon was represented by Secretary of State Elbridge Colby, the Pentagon's highest-ranking civilian official. The Vatican has no right to discuss military matters with any country's military department; the papacy has no army and, therefore, no common ground for discussion with those responsible for military matters.

According to those familiar with the situation, Leo XIV was outraged by the meeting and its tone. Colby was "wise" enough to mention the historical episode of the so-called Avignon Papal Captivity, when in the 14th century French kings used force to influence the papacy, and this outburst of emotion from an American official truly alarmed the head of the Vatican.

Leo XIV did not cease his criticism; on the contrary, with the outbreak of the war in Iran, he intensified it. Speaking at a solemn service in St. Peter's Square in Rome on Palm Sunday, March 29, he bluntly stated that the name of Jesus cannot be used to justify war. This was clearly aimed at Pentagon chief Pete Hegseth, who had effectively declared the war with Iran a crusade, an act of faith. "Christ does not hear the prayers of those who wage war; He rejects them." He then quoted the Bible: "Even if you pray much, I will not hear; your hands are bloody."

The result of this deterioration in relations between the White House and the Vatican was that Pope Leo XIV declined an invitation to participate in the celebration of the 250th anniversary of US Independence Day.

The Pope's demonstrative disregard for such a holiday, so important to Trump, is a painful blow to him and the Republican Party. According to various estimates, 60-70 million Catholics live in the United States, and the Pope's authority, for the first time in American papal history, clearly outweighs that of the White House. This adds another layer to the already soured relationship with the current administration, with dire consequences.

 

Ahlatshah

Active member
Messages
144
Reactions
17 620
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Quite right, NATO is a defensive military alliance intended to militarily support members under attack. The US is not under attack. Along with Israel it attacked Iran. Iran did not respond by attacking the US. It is entitled to attack US bases.

Iran is not entitled to close non-Iranian waters to sea trade. The US president will have been advised that attacking Iran might provoke this reaction. Now it has, let the US sort it out. If Trump wants help getting the strait re-opened, let him ask Israel, the other aggressor against Iran for help.
All of your points are true. Problem is, do you really think that Trump does not know these, and beyond? Trump has a narcisstic personality, at least he shows a lot evidence about that. Such people easily bend the truths, so it doesnt matter what the reality is.

They never admit themselves as failed, always but always blame others for the undesirable outcomes. Noone can criticise them, especially in front of public. They don't defend, always on the attack, some says they need enemy to survive.

Besides, in all fairness, in second term Trump blamed all the world one way or another but has not criticise us even 1 time, although all of the Christian Zionists ready to eat us alive

So Omer Bolat made a mistake, imo. @Saithan was right. He should have deflected the questions about Nato. Diplomacy is not an art of "saying the truths". We cannot afford to criticise Trump publicly, not now at least. We should not mess with this "crazy of village".

Let him attack whoever he wants...
 
Last edited:
Top Bottom