TR Land Vehicle Programs

Reviewbrah

Contributor
Messages
535
Reactions
2,349
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
Aselsan Korhan

EmoDrlQXIAA9f3s


Not the meant for the same purpose but some similar features
 
Last edited:

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,781
Reactions
37 20,066
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey

Video telling that some of our export markets Uzbekistan, Georgia chose to make copy products and not JV.
 

CAN_TR

Contributor
Messages
1,482
Reactions
17 5,225
Nation of residence
Austria
Nation of origin
Turkey

what

Experienced member
Moderator
Messages
2,198
Reactions
10 6,497
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Both are probably bidding for the project.
 
A

adenl

Guest


Rumors that BMC will get the bigger chunk of the 8x8/6x6 contract for what at first sight appears to resemble a licenced South African design.

Would be a shame, considering FNSS has tested it's vehicle family for so long, kept improving it and even went ahead to create different versions. Especially the izci type vehicles just look phenominal. I also feel like the whole ordeal drags the process of putting a fleet of 8x8/6x6 into the inventory way longer on that it has to.

I know BMC bashing has become a meme by now, but it's hard to ignore what's going on. I'm personally actually a fan of the Kirpi vehicles, they really are a work horse for TSK's needs.
What variant will the 236 units be? Just regular APC or also specialized variants like the first 100 that went to FNSS?
 
A

adenl

Guest
The Turkish army should wait for an APC in the class of the boxer, technologically and modularity wise. The current Turkish APC designs are not groundbreaking and with upgrade plans for the ACV-15's and the Kirpi's replacing the M113 in infantry brigades, there should be no rush for a new non-groundbreaking APC, expect of course for the specialized roles.

And for the fact that BMC gets favored over other, more established companies, that has to do with the politco-cultural background of Turkey. Turkey is a hierarchical society and working together in Turkish politics is almost not done. The political leaders all have too large ego's and that is reflective in the way the Turkish politics under-functioned from 1938-2002, hence with the army needing to take control behind the scenes in order not to let Turkey get torn apart by both internal and external forces. There is very little if any horizontal power stratification in Turkish politics and upper-level bureaucratic and thus in order for orders to be effectively carried out, Turkish politics requires a more intimate and closer contact between the President, ministers and with upper-level bureaucratic managers, business leaders and the media than in more egalistic societies such as western-European ones. Combine this with a geo-politically rising Turkey in the 'ghetto' neighborhood of the world, the power structures need to be more vertically solidified in order for the power-structure to keep functioning with enough clout. Hence a presidential system and nepotistic style of rule is more effective than an idealistically (and naive) parliamentarian system and a egalistic but very cumbersome political descisionmaking.

Such is the political reality of Turkey.
 
Last edited by a moderator:

AzeriTank

Contributor
Messages
711
Reactions
3 1,795
Nation of residence
Azerbaijan
Nation of origin
Azerbaijan
The Turkish army should wait for an APC in the class of the boxer, technologically and modularity wise. The current Turkish APC designs are not groundbreaking and with upgrade plans for the ACV-15's and the Kirpi's replacing the M113 in infantry brigades, there should be no rush for a new non-groundbreaking APC, expect of course for the specialized roles.
dont put 8x8 vehicles at the same class, 8x8 can easily use 105mm as a light tank.. they are also around 37 ton if armed, compare to others, its a lot...
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom