TR Land Vehicle Programs

Bogeyman 

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
9,192
Reactions
67 31,253
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

turkish-fnss-pars-iii-6x6-2021.jpg

The Turkish Army Is Switching To Wheeled APCs​

Since 2016 the Turkish armed forces have undergone a drastic shift in its mission and role. Fully committed to NATO in the past, it’s now acting far beyond the alliance’s purview as it shapes events in the Caucasus, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and beyond. This pursuit of an aggressive foreign policy is happening alongside a piecemeal modernization that involves world-class equipment. In the first half of 2019 the country’s leading armored vehicle manufacturer announced it won orders to supply the army with its PARS 6×6 and 8×8 APCs. According to FNSS it will supply an initial batch of 100 PARS APCs for the army and the Gendarmerie or national police force.


The army’s mechanized units are still reliant on some 3,000 M113A2 APCs supplied by the US and assembled by FNSS. The number of infantry fighting vehicles or IFVs are much smaller and these are the ACV-15, whose age and characteristics are just as outdated. The shortcomings of ACV-15’s and M113’s are apparent when up against the portable anti-armor and anti-material weaponry fielded by insurgents battling the Turkish armed forces. In recent years the army switched to a fleet of MRAPs manufactured by BMC that earned their combat records against PKK Terrorist Organization and open warfare in Syria and Libya.

The PARS 6×6 Scout is now the army’s choice to fulfill three roles in the near future: command and control; reconnaissance in hazardous or toxic environments (CBRNe); mobile electronic warfare and signals intelligence. For a single vehicle to be chosen for such diverse roles proves the sterling qualities of the PARS 6×6. Fully amphibious and heavily armored, the PARS 6×6 has a different layout compared to other wheeled APCs. The entire crew are seated in the cab with the engine compartment located behind them. This is comparable to the French-made VAB or the German-made Fuchs. The PARS 6×6, however, is better protected with its monocoque hull encased in add-on panels giving it ballistic protection as high as STANAG IV.

The larger PARS 8×8 may enter service with the Turkish military later on. Its public record as an exportable combat vehicle is decent enough with Malaysia and Oman being its primary clients. What makes the PARS 6×6 and 8×8 so impressive isn’t just their mobility but a hydro-pneumatic suspension system allowing them to navigate across varied terrain better than older wheeled APCs such as the LAV/Piranha and even the BTR-series. The PARS 8×8 is also meant to be armed based on the end user’s requirements, whether it’s a turret for a medium caliber weapon or a 120mm mortar. As a mortar carrier the PARS 8×8 has enough space to fit the complete artillery piece inside its hull along with the ammunition.

The basic armament for the PARS 6×6 Scout is a .50 caliber machine gun on a remote weapon station. But FNSS can install a 25mm, 30mm, or 35mm cannon together with grenade launchers and machine guns on an unmanned turret if needed. A particularly lethal option is a pivoting launcher with two OMTAS ATGMs that each have a range of 4 kilometers. Turkish manufacturers know how to integrate non-standard weapons (like those made in Russia) on their vehicles too. The PARS 6×6’s exports are very promising since Turkey is committed to rebuilding the militaries of its newfound friends outside Europe. The needed mechanization and mobility of armies in distant countries such as Somalia and Qatar, not to mention existing clients in Southeast Asia, may open medium-term opportunities.

The PARS 8×8 and 6×6 do face competition from local rivals. The manufacturer BMC has a new wheeled armored transport of its own and Otokar’s impressive military catalog isn’t fading away soon.
 

Stuka

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
713
Reactions
5 4,540
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
BMC Updated their Website.

Kirpi II METI

1627997486036.png
1627997597361.png


> The Usual Kirpi II has a 375HP Engine but this one weighs 24 Tons !


Kirpi II Carrier Vehicle

1627997760557.png
1627997954627.png



> More Powerful Engine as well.
> Combat Weight 23.3 Tons and Payload 2.6 Tons (Kirpi Standart 1.7 Tons)
> This one is for ATGM and Comparable Systems. Somebody tweeted that they had seen the Kirpi and Vuran with ATGMs.




BMC Vuran MLRS Carrier.

1627998508191.png


> No Info on this one. Why is it 4 Doors ? Could have had more Space with 2 Doors.


BMC Vuran Mortar

1627998584138.png


> Combat Weight 20 Tons.



Tank Carrier 8x8 with BMC POWER Engine

1627998735963.png

Attention!
Engine is AZRA GEN 2 (BMC POWER)


1627998808993.png


> Delivers 600HP and 3000NM Torque!
> 90 Kph
> 800KM Range


> Transmission Allison 4800
> Empty Weight 22 Tons, Max. 120 Tons.



BMC Tulga SUV and Pickup

1627999643788.png


> Payload of 1 Tons. Could carry

- For the Record a ZU-23 23MM Antiaircraft Gun weighs 950kgs :D
 

Attachments

  • 1627997573457.png
    1627997573457.png
    20.7 KB · Views: 126

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,209
Reactions
106 19,335
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey

turkish-fnss-pars-iii-6x6-2021.jpg

The Turkish Army Is Switching To Wheeled APCs​

Since 2016 the Turkish armed forces have undergone a drastic shift in its mission and role. Fully committed to NATO in the past, it’s now acting far beyond the alliance’s purview as it shapes events in the Caucasus, Iraq, Libya, Syria, and beyond. This pursuit of an aggressive foreign policy is happening alongside a piecemeal modernization that involves world-class equipment. In the first half of 2019 the country’s leading armored vehicle manufacturer announced it won orders to supply the army with its PARS 6×6 and 8×8 APCs. According to FNSS it will supply an initial batch of 100 PARS APCs for the army and the Gendarmerie or national police force.


The army’s mechanized units are still reliant on some 3,000 M113A2 APCs supplied by the US and assembled by FNSS. The number of infantry fighting vehicles or IFVs are much smaller and these are the ACV-15, whose age and characteristics are just as outdated. The shortcomings of ACV-15’s and M113’s are apparent when up against the portable anti-armor and anti-material weaponry fielded by insurgents battling the Turkish armed forces. In recent years the army switched to a fleet of MRAPs manufactured by BMC that earned their combat records against PKK Terrorist Organization and open warfare in Syria and Libya.

The PARS 6×6 Scout is now the army’s choice to fulfill three roles in the near future: command and control; reconnaissance in hazardous or toxic environments (CBRNe); mobile electronic warfare and signals intelligence. For a single vehicle to be chosen for such diverse roles proves the sterling qualities of the PARS 6×6. Fully amphibious and heavily armored, the PARS 6×6 has a different layout compared to other wheeled APCs. The entire crew are seated in the cab with the engine compartment located behind them. This is comparable to the French-made VAB or the German-made Fuchs. The PARS 6×6, however, is better protected with its monocoque hull encased in add-on panels giving it ballistic protection as high as STANAG IV.

The larger PARS 8×8 may enter service with the Turkish military later on. Its public record as an exportable combat vehicle is decent enough with Malaysia and Oman being its primary clients. What makes the PARS 6×6 and 8×8 so impressive isn’t just their mobility but a hydro-pneumatic suspension system allowing them to navigate across varied terrain better than older wheeled APCs such as the LAV/Piranha and even the BTR-series. The PARS 8×8 is also meant to be armed based on the end user’s requirements, whether it’s a turret for a medium caliber weapon or a 120mm mortar. As a mortar carrier the PARS 8×8 has enough space to fit the complete artillery piece inside its hull along with the ammunition.

The basic armament for the PARS 6×6 Scout is a .50 caliber machine gun on a remote weapon station. But FNSS can install a 25mm, 30mm, or 35mm cannon together with grenade launchers and machine guns on an unmanned turret if needed. A particularly lethal option is a pivoting launcher with two OMTAS ATGMs that each have a range of 4 kilometers. Turkish manufacturers know how to integrate non-standard weapons (like those made in Russia) on their vehicles too. The PARS 6×6’s exports are very promising since Turkey is committed to rebuilding the militaries of its newfound friends outside Europe. The needed mechanization and mobility of armies in distant countries such as Somalia and Qatar, not to mention existing clients in Southeast Asia, may open medium-term opportunities.

The PARS 8×8 and 6×6 do face competition from local rivals. The manufacturer BMC has a new wheeled armored transport of its own and Otokar’s impressive military catalog isn’t fading away soon.
My opinion is that among wheeled IFV/APC acquisition TSK should also acquire a good number of tracked APC/IFVs. The reason for this is that I think they will be better suited for urban warfare due to their higher maneuverability and pivoting capability. I think pivoting capability is crucial when we look at the infrastructure of smaller Turkish cities or even some neighbourhoods in big cities and cities in neighbouring countries where small and tight streets are very common.

The Turkish Land Forces should have versatility in this regard and I think some mechanized infantry units should be specialized in urban warfare by training emphasizing urban warfare tactics and also their armor and equipment to be optimized for urban warfare operations. I think the Turkish Land Forces have deficiency in modern urban warfare equipment, trained and specialized personnel. This could be solved by specializing or creating mechanized infantry units for urban warfare procuring modern tracked APC/IFVs, modern light/medium tanks, modern urban warfare equipment like advanced grappling hooks, advanced breaching equipment, higher quantity of sensors like behind the wall radars, acoustic sensors, effective IED/mine detection and demolition systems, higher quantity of small recon drones, higher quantity of small kamikaze UAVs (Kargu type), effective integration of small/medium/heavy class UGVs into the mechanized infantry structure and urban warfare tactics. I think we have the capacity to solve these issues and with our advanced defence industry capabilities we can give solution to these problems.
 

Spook

Contributor
Messages
607
Reactions
2,106
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
E79Wz4aWQAYAzhu.jpg


FNSS-IDEF-New-armoured-Vehicles-tracked-wheeled.jpg


E6keVHlWQAIX83L.jpg


Otokar and FNSS probably going to display their new designs at IDEF. Tender should start when BMC is ready :)
 

Spook

Contributor
Messages
607
Reactions
2,106
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
E79FUBmXsAQtii3.png


Pretty good for Africa, Middle East, and Latin America markets. Otokar can offer it as Panhard etc. replacement.
 

Abdelaziz

Contributor
Messages
491
Reactions
1 821
Nation of residence
England(UK)
Nation of origin
Lebanon
View attachment 27318

View attachment 27319

View attachment 27320

Otokar and FNSS probably going to display their new designs at IDEF. Tender should start when BMC is ready :)
Bmc is maturing a local engine for the first time in the country ... this is high value strategic project .... So yes ..they deserve to wait for them 🙂 in the same way .. a high strategic project is fnss 6×6 pars with tümosan engines .. it should be prioritized too ... This is SSB priority "the local subs"
 

Abdelaziz

Contributor
Messages
491
Reactions
1 821
Nation of residence
England(UK)
Nation of origin
Lebanon
A huge corp like otokar should use more systems either by its own R&D or by support local manufacturers like tumosan who has a really nearly ready power group that could replace the foreign groups
 

Spook

Contributor
Messages
607
Reactions
2,106
Nation of residence
Albania
Nation of origin
Turkey
Bmc is maturing a local engine for the first time in the country ... this is high value strategic project .... So yes ..they deserve to wait for them 🙂 in the same way .. a high strategic project is fnss 6×6 pars with tümosan engines .. it should be prioritized too ... This is SSB priority "the local subs"

Again, engine rights belong to government, paid by taxpayer money. Any company can offer it for their platform.
 

Abdelaziz

Contributor
Messages
491
Reactions
1 821
Nation of residence
England(UK)
Nation of origin
Lebanon
Again, engine rights belong to government, paid by taxpayer money. Any company can offer it for their platform.
Yes the state supported them and this is normal with the strategical proj ..but they did their job and did a great work ... And deserve to be appreciated
 

Stuka

Contributor
Think Tank Analyst
Messages
713
Reactions
5 4,540
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
SOF 6x6 variant. It is specially designed for our special forces.

- Yes. That's part of the different Order for Special Forces Command. Initial 12 Vehicles. (MKKA Project)
- The Other Commands (Land Forces Command and Gendarmerie Command) will receive initially 100 PARS IZCI. (ÖMTTZA Project)
- The Big Tender for Land Forces Command for 8x8 and 6x6 IFVs is awaiting its Trials for 2962 Vehicles. (YNHZA Project)
 

Khagan1923

Contributor
Messages
970
Reactions
14 4,147
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
Pars IV 6x6 is just a upgraded Pars III 6x6. Pars IV 8x8 is the crown jewel. The demand for 6x6 is just not there.
 
Top Bottom