TR Libya Operations & Updates

Glass🚬

Contributor
Messages
1,388
Reactions
2 3,159
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey

azaher77

Committed member
Messages
230
Reactions
1 1,688
Nation of residence
Jordan

Der Spiegel: “Turkey prevents the German army from inspecting a Turkish transport ship suspected of transporting weapons to Libya.” To clarify: The German move comes within the framework of the “Ireni mission to monitor the transfer of weapons to Libya.”

؟؟؟؟؟؟؟؟
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,276
Reactions
147 16,482
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
We should demand a formal apology from the German government for the illegal action they have taken against our civilian ship, through state channels.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,782
Reactions
37 20,075
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
That is what I was thinking as well. An apology would indicate wrongdoings.y

But if they're not going to do it, then we'll just hold it against them. They keep mentioning their EU meeting in december anyway, so the more they fuck up the less pompous they can act.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,782
Reactions
37 20,075
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey

 
Last edited:

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,155
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

One should ask it by now, do they dare to check any other vessels or fligts from UAE or KSA except some which were carrying crude oil. Or are they overlooking some vessels which is definitely known to carry arms?
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,782
Reactions
37 20,075
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
One should ask it by now, do they dare to check any other vessels or fligts from UAE or KSA except some which were carrying crude oil. Or are they overlooking some vessels which is definitely known to carry arms?


According to Ret. Adm. Kutluk says the illegal action has given Turkey the right to answer in kind, which is like opening up Pandora's box. Turkey will be able to violate UN rules about searching ships flagging German and Greek vessels in open seas.
 

Yasar_TR

Experienced member
Staff member
Administrator
Messages
3,276
Reactions
147 16,482
Nation of residence
United Kingdom
Nation of origin
Turkey
We should start searching Greek and German ships going through Bosphorus and Dardanelles until we receive a formal apology.
 

Fuzuli NL

Experienced member
Germany Correspondent
Messages
3,084
Reactions
27 8,777
Nation of residence
Germany
Nation of origin
Turkey
There will be consequences!
I can't believe how incompetent Europeans can be sometimes!
The operation was reportedly under Greek command. That probably says it all!
 

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,155
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
We should start searching Greek and German ships going through Bosphorus and Dardanelles until we receive a formal apology.
We can do that, we have all the rights in sovereign waters.
The matter is bigger, in fact Germans has realized they have violated international law under pressure of Greeks, they have got some issues to deal within themselves.
You can not simply rain a ship, open the ,locked-sealed by sovereign state's custom office, containers by force without video documentation and approval -presence of the captain. You can not make sure of those soldiers to hang out around opened containers, will not intend to slip something in those containers to be found guilty later, or to pick something to be missing later.
However in sovereign waters you don't need SOF to raid ships, you can board with your civilian inspectors and they have no reason to prevent from that, any sovereign flag state has rights to do thorough inspections on the vessels entering its waters.
You can not detain the captain of a ship unless he has refused to be cooperative out of the lawful actions, and you can not open containers without him inspecting the process.
The only valid way of stopping a vessel in international waters, if it is headed to your waters and you suspect its cargo, or validity of the verbal declaration of captain, then you can stop, search it with soldiers.
The another valid way that the vessel has been through suspicious activities, history of port visits, false declared cargo or destination, suspicious departure from unregistered ports, or not responding to the radio comms, then the vessel can be expect with flag state's approval.

declaring a mission within an union doesn't make them eligible or by-pass to violate international trading law.
 

Kartal1

Experienced member
Lead Moderator
Messages
5,291
Reactions
114 19,719
Nation of residence
Bulgaria
Nation of origin
Turkey
We can do that, we have all the rights in sovereign waters.
The matter is bigger, in fact Germans has realized they have violated international law under pressure of Greeks, they have got some issues to deal within themselves.
You can not simply rain a ship, open the ,locked-sealed by sovereign state's custom office, containers by force without video documentation and approval -presence of the captain. You can not make sure of those soldiers to hang out around opened containers, will not intend to slip something in those containers to be found guilty later, or to pick something to be missing later.
However in sovereign waters you don't need SOF to raid ships, you can board with your civilian inspectors and they have no reason to prevent from that, any sovereign flag state has rights to do thorough inspections on the vessels entering its waters.
You can not detain the captain of a ship unless he has refused to be cooperative out of the lawful actions, and you can not open containers without him inspecting the process.
The only valid way of stopping a vessel in international waters, if it is headed to your waters and you suspect its cargo, or validity of the verbal declaration of captain, then you can stop, search it with soldiers.
The another valid way that the vessel has been through suspicious activities, history of port visits, false declared cargo or destination, suspicious departure from unregistered ports, or not responding to the radio comms, then the vessel can be expect with flag state's approval.

declaring a mission within an union doesn't make them eligible or by-pass to violate international trading law.
If what you say is true then what is the point of Operation Irini in the first place? If I understand properly you can not conduct a VBSS operation on a vessel in international or internal waters of another country if the ship have its flag and the flag country don't give it's consent of the search right?
 

Bogeyman 

Experienced member
Professional
Messages
9,192
Reactions
67 31,256
Website
twitter.com
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey

Anmdt

Experienced member
Naval Specialist
Professional
Messages
5,540
Solutions
2
Reactions
119 25,155
Nation of residence
Turkey
Nation of origin
Turkey
If what you say is true then what is the point of Operation Irini in the first place? If I understand properly you can not conduct a VBSS operation on a vessel in international or internal waters of another country if the ship have its flag and the flag country don't give it's consent of the search right?
If the ship is in internal waters of a country, that countrt has right to conduct search, seize, inspect the ship without consent of the flag state of the vessel.
In international waters, there should be eithere extreme suspicion on drugs, or suspicious or shadowy history, false declaration to intercept the ship. Or the ship should be avoiding comms, hinting pirates have seized or something is not alright with the crew, otherwise there is need for approval of the flag state which ship is registered to.
I don't really understand what operation irini is meant to, but if it is lawful they could obtain rights to control and inspect any ship visiting or leaving libyan waters claiming sovereignty of libya is unclear.
 

Saithan

Experienced member
Denmark Correspondent
Messages
8,782
Reactions
37 20,075
Nation of residence
Denmark
Nation of origin
Turkey
If the ship is in internal waters of a country, that countrt has right to conduct search, seize, inspect the ship without consent of the flag state of the vessel.
In international waters, there should be eithere extreme suspicion on drugs, or suspicious or shadowy history, false declaration to intercept the ship. Or the ship should be avoiding comms, hinting pirates have seized or something is not alright with the crew, otherwise there is need for approval of the flag state which ship is registered to.
I don't really understand what operation irini is meant to, but if it is lawful they could obtain rights to control and inspect any ship visiting or leaving libyan waters claiming sovereignty of libya is unclear.
I think these moves have been made deliberate tbh.

I believe they're building up tension with several EU countries to work the public opinion and at the same time shape it for sanctions they want to put on Turkey.

Remember they're being silent and ignoring details of the incident while their "own" press is focused on Turkey not allowing the search, while ignoring that it was illegal.

The simple fact that they found nothing but humanitarian aid is just a footnote in all this.


German representative is talking about Turkey being disruptive to NATO, which speaks volumes of their real stance on Turkey.
 

Follow us on social media

Top Bottom